Unpaid Paul Bloggers Thwart Paid-For Hillary Bloggers
Most interesting article on the net today is from NewsMax and you can find it here:
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/hillary_blogger/2007/10/18/...
Sometimes a core group of people fighting in the right way for the right things can accomplish amazing things. Apparently one of the many strategies of a dynasty in-exile was to create a left-wing blogosphere to propel Ms. Hill to the presidency. All the plans were were put into place at no small expense long ago thinking the ultimate trap had been set. and, then, an upstart group of freedom-riders blew the nefarious plan to smithereens.
Do they not say we "own" the internet? And, unlike Ms. Hill, it didn't cost Ron Paul a penny! Must have surprised the *** out of the Clinton marketing team! I also noticed that Ms Hill now has quite a list of meet-up groups...mostly made up of 1-3 people. And, I won't say anything about what some of those groups call themselves.
I believe we won one for "our gipper"....all freedom lovers as well as those who want to prevent the net from being completely owned by the corporate overlords. Keep the net free and plans to enslave through manipulative media will be overcome every time by truth seeking individuals bound together by a common, passionate cause.
Oh!myGod
I have been searching the blogosphere for "hillary" and adding the comment shown below. I saved a text copy of the comment on my desktop. I have registered on Google as a blogger, and I am using the advanced Technorati and Google blog searches. When I see suitable blog I paste the text file containing the html into the comment box.
Oh my God!
ANYCITYUSA -- Hillary Rodham Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for U.S. President, may be called as a material witness in the State of California, in what may be the largest election fraud in U.S. history. All news of this case has been effectively censored in the U.S. mainstream media. Read the full story in The Wall Street Journal, "For Clinton, 2000 Fund-Raising Controversy Lingers".
Hillary may have violated the law by not reporting large contributions to her successful 2000 campaign for U.S. Senator. Mr. Peter F. Paul claims that his contributions were omitted from the public reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, and Hillary denies all knowledge of these contributions. Read the latest ruling in Case B191066, Paul v. Clinton.
Hillary even denies knowing Mr. Paul, a three time convicted felon, who made the contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign. A video, "Hillary Exposed", produced by the Equal Justice Foundation of America has been viewed more than 725,000 times. A case such as this normally ends any aspirations that a politician may have for public office, and certainly raises questions about the illicit fund-raising practices in the Clinton camp.
"Who is John Galt?"
I will assume that you have
I will assume that you have not seen this video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7007109937779036019
Tim
http://ronpaul.meetup.com/1040/
http://www.rxforliberty.com/10/
Cedar Park, Texas
5 Aug 2007
It'll go nowhere...
The corrupt judges and prosecuters will again go to work for Hillary and shield the swindler...the press will happily go along with the charade. People will vote for that kind of Oligarchary because they believe in the freebees Hillary is promising them.
Ach du lieber Himmel
What if the foreign press picked up on this?
"Who is John Galt?"
Anyone smell a Hillary in need of a bath??
Hillary is so dirty it amazes me sometimes. I just cannot believe how many people would actually support her. Oh, I know there are very good indications that some are paid and others who funnel money in to support her are coming from outside sources, but seriously! How can anyone support this woman??? Of course, both Clintons have made my skin crawl for a couple of decades now.
ICK! ICK! ICK! ICK!
Not the most eloquent expression of my distate, but the one that always comes to mind when I read anything about them!!!
-Nancy
eBay RP08 code
Don't forget to list your extra stuff for sale on eBay and use the code RP08 so that supporters can shop amongst ourselves when possible...
where are the Paul bloggers there?
David Horowitz is a neocon among neocons. A flaming, raging, neocon extraordinaire with extra pickles and jalapen~os -- and a big hard-on for the idea that America needs to fear and hate "Islamofascists"... forever. Did I miss something? I see an article on NewsMax written by a co-author of DH's. Where's the Paul?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is begun in anger, ends in shame.
My Point Was
....that the article outlined how much effort was expended by the Clinton camp to "buy" an internet base of bloggers and, therefore, "implied" support for the Hillary bid. He obviously is anti-Hillary but, of course, no friend of ours. I just found it interesting that the Clinton attempts to buy a base of bloggers when compared to the sincere efforts and amazing achievements of those blogging for Ron Paul, fall short.
I doubt the Clinton camp would ever dreamed of Ron Paul having this kind of success on the internet. .The Horowitz article made me proud our success on the internet. And, to me there is blowback for Horowitz. His article actually presents Ron Paul in a great light. Everyone knows we are grass root...not contrived.
fonta
good comparison; bad headline
Your point is quite valid. The headline was confusing though; I kept expecting some mention of Ron Paul in the article, or some way in which RP bloggers entered the picture. We unpaid Paul bloggers didn't thwart anything in that story; Hillary's misbehavior was caught by one of her (pretend?) enemies. Of course I'm always happy to see Hillary get busted.... :-)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is begun in anger, ends in shame.
Tucker
Watching Tucker and gang basically mocking Paul, disgusting. Too bad they can't have a serious discussion of the issues that RP brings up.