Help on Counter-terrorism Committee info
Submitted by Devon_Saunders on Wed, 02/13/2008 - 11:07
Need some help if anyone knows.. recently a gentleman that works with my wife joined the Counter-Terrorism Committee as a gun-toting member. I'll try to get more information from him as I go, but the CTC is a UN matter.. does that meant that we are now going to have UN sanctioned deputized people watching all that we do locally as well? And what is thier jurisdicion? If I'm reading this right, this gentleman will be one of the ones holding the gun between me and the grocery store if the economy tanks and we go under the 6900 protocols, so I'd really appreciate any input from someone who knows more.
My starting point is here... http://www.un.org/sc/ctc/
»
The short answer to your question as I see it is...
Yes.
Here's their mandate...
--> http://www.un.org/sc/ctc/mandate.shtml
And if you read thru it and the various Security Council resolutions it lists (and those that are nested within those resolutions) it seems pretty clear that the UN Security Council and it's CTC place itself at the top of the chain of command, with the UN member states being subserviant. Simply stated. all member states MUST report & do everything they can to control terrorism.
Now if you consider that in light of the definition of 'terrorism' in HR.1955...well, we'd run the risk of being labeled terrorists for simply having this conversation.
True
Because in speaking against our current government, we are using force, or a forcible arguement... blah.
I'm more concerned about the use of UN-delegated Americans with guns and why they are being placed in relation to the 6900 protocols.
And this is how the U.S. Treasury would handle an economic collapse. It’s called the 6900 series of protocols. It would start with declaring a force majeure, which would immediately be interpreted by the marketplaces as a de facto repudiation of debt. Then the SEC and the various regulatory exchanges would anticipate the market’s decline, hour by hour -- when Japan’s markets opened the next day, what would happen when the European markets, and all the inter-linkages of the global markets. On the second day, US Special Forces would be dropped in by parachute in the cities where the twelve Federal Reserve district banks are located.
The origin of these protocols comes from the Department of Defense. This is contingency planning for a variety of post-collapse scenarios. Those scenarios would include, obviously, military collapse, World War III, in other words, and its aftermath. What we’re talking about now is aftermath -- how the aftermath would be handled.
I'll keep digging, but it's not starting to look too good....
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~
Ahh...I see
I found the same article you quote from, but no more. It would stand to reason that any controlling interest would use whatever assets they could spare to assist in achieving their objective. And from the impression I get with the UN's CTC placing themselves at the head of the chain of command would be that a CTC deputy would certainly be 'in the know'.
Just my .02 on this, based on 20min of research.
Yep
I think I'll be nice to the local guy here and attempt an infiltrate and see what's going on... too much conjecture online about it so far. I want reality facts now... lol
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~
Bump
Unify
Unify
Single shameless bump
I'm trying to connect some dots here that may effect us all... help anyone?
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~
I'm game...
Give me a bit to read up on it and do some research...
Bump for help and more opinions/input?
Thanks Jeff
looks like this will take some digging.. info is sparse. However, the less I can find about a subject the more it piques my interest.. especially in this area.
~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~