Prediction The United States Supreme Court Will Astonish, all of us and WILL BAN GUNS

0 votes

I'm Making a Prediction, if arguments are correct and if indeed this administration or the next will impose martial law, and based on the firearms confiscation of legal firearms holders during Katrina.

And as the effects of the unconstitutional Un-Patriot Act Lingers Unchallenged

As stated today we will have military police riding trains. Starting to feel like we are undergoing a Nazi occupation yet?

Remember in May 2008, all of the states are supposed to convert all of the Sheeple with REAL ID Cards.

As the JACK BOOTED THUGS as we have heard them referred to, stops by a person on the train with his GERMAN SHEPARD, and ask of an unsuspecting passenger, may I see your "REAL ID CARD Please"?

Well everyone on the train will now be frightened by both you and him. What if dogs make you nervous? will you look like a suspicious person?

Despite what everyone believes, and that is, The United States Supreme Court will finally confirm the second amendments Right of The PEOPLE to BARE ARMS as an individual right.

I Predict they will act in full conspiracy with the other two branches of government.

They will rule against the people, and limit further or outright Ban the peoples right to keep and bare arms!

Has anyone but myself been puzzled, that not only Bush, but also, now McCain has stated that they both will only appoint strict constructionist judges. You know ones that won't legislate from the bench!

Hmmmmm,? Lets see, Bush while committing Treason, convinces a majority of the house and senate to also Commit Treason in a majority attempt to overthrow the constitution, by passing an unconstitutional law, falsely called the patriot Act, and then they both want to appoint Supreme Court Justices to stop them from doing that?

If the Supreme court does join them, then we need to dissolve our union, one state at a time or all at once.

We are indeed Ripe for a R3Volutionary March on Washington.

But don't forget your birth certificate, your real id card, and your TASER PROOF Armor WEAR. DO THEY MAKE SUCH A THING? What makes you think we have the right to protest?

Perhaps Bush can issue a one page booklet outlining what if any, of the rights or right, he as United States Dictator in Chief has decided to leave to the people. Sorry I meant sheeple?

Please give my Hmmmmm,? comment some thought!

Next Prediction, McCain will name Putin, sorry I did not mean to insult Putin. I meant to say McCain will choose Bush as his running mate

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Bump

to save this site

As of right now the Supreme

Court rulings have upheld the right of governments to ban guns. The Parker case, in which the Court is ruling on a the total ban of handguns in D.C., will consider the right of governments to ban guns. My guess is that they will rule against the D.C. and restore the right of citizens to own a handgun (with conditions) in D.C.

h-daddy

H-daddy

Your analysis is dead on target.

Good pun!

I hope I am right about the Parker case. Although only a few US cities have these blanket laws, overturning this irrational law will probably lead to a thorough examination of all gun laws and, more importantly, give some encouragement to those thinking of challenging other gun laws. I am not a believer in an absolute right to own a gun, but, I feel the right of the government to restrict gun ownership should be very very limited in scope. Of course, a constitutionalist such as Dr.Paul, would be clever enough to word this properly and frame the situation in terms of individual rights and freedoms. I'm not that clever.

h-daddy

Will Happen

To all the naysayers here, what makes you think that a Supreme Court that now allows government to take your house by eminent domain (for almost any use, including a superhighway), or just this week refuses to hear a case on illegal government wiretapping of US citizens would have any objection to promoting national security by preventing insurrections or removing tools of terrorism by these same citizens? That's how it could be framed in a broader case, and that's how it's going to ultimately be decided.

The events in New Orleans can and will be repeated elsewhere. The government has no interest in your independence or self-sufficiency.

Said the judge in the previous decision in favor of the ban:
To sum up, there is no dispute that the Constitution, case law and applicable statutes all establish that the District is not a State within the meaning of the Second Amendment. Under United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. at 178, the Second Amendment's declaration and guarantee that "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" relates to the Militia of the States only. That the Second Amendment does not apply to the District, then, is, to me, an unavoidable conclusion.

Unfortunately

Fortune Favors the Bold

Emminent domain is constitutional. The question is what is "just compensation." It's a vaguely defined term. Personally, I would like to see that part of the constitution changed.

Fortune Favors the Bold

Ain't Never Ever Gonna Happen

No Bloody F'N Way! This Country has way way to many Good Old Boys - RedNecks - Crackers - Ex Military - Hunters - Outdoors men - ETC ETC!
If you never been to a gun show - Go to one & you will see all of these fine folk in person, hell if you come to Ohio you'll run into me.

Also everyone of these individuals are crack shots & in fact most have also spent many an hour with their kids - target shooting. This is one of the prime reason that our country has never been invaded. There are arsenals of weapons thru out this country - every country hollar - small town - big town - middle of nowhere -

They fear an Armed Populace & Rightly So

"If you don't stand behind our troops, PLEASE feel free to stand in front of them!"

PREDICTIONS

Predictions are a dime a dozen and all yours are really way out there....You also have virtually nothing to base them on.....Simply not going to happen.....relax before you have a stroke or something

Sadly, I have to agree with you.

They took away guns from the people in Austrialia, we're next... the handwriting on the wall...

I dunno bout that...

The MSM has been surprising me lately. They actually have been the GUN PEOPLE to have their say on this issue. Their point is that if the pilots and professors had guns much of this stuff would not happen.

Either way, we need more recruits and we have to keep getting RPs name out there... here is my two cents...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gg2jh04cclY

Does my burka make my butt look fatwa?

One word. Bull.

One word. Bull.

..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore

I'd put all my money on this happening.

Last chance= RP2008

Last chance= RP2008

The SCOTUS does not have the

The SCOTUS does not have the power or authority to ban anything. They can only determine what the government's power is...

----
Registered Republican
Federalist Society Member
REAL Conservative for Ron Paul

Right

Exactly, I predict the Supreme Court will agree with the Federal Government that the government has the power to BAN GUNS!!!

Mark my words, this has become the United States Supreme Kangaroo Court!

Daryl

it would be nice if the rest of my comment

could post along with the first line.

Once our man is in office

we will ask for the "dismemberment" (

Once our man is in office

we will ask for the "dismemberment" (

What would happen if...

everyone that owned guns all decided to trade guns with each other, at the same time, right out in public, at an organized function like a nation-wide rally or something of that nature?
Would it render any government gun registration system useless?

In my state, person to person gun sales require no paperwork

It is just sales from gun dealers to people which go through the background check, but there is even then no waiting period unless the system is down.

I have personally bought guns (both rifles and pistols) at gun shows from other individuals as simply as agreeing on the price and turning over the cash for the gun, neither of us knowing who the other was. I have also bought guns from individuals known to me only through a mutual friend. All this is completely legal in Missouri.

It is just when transactions between individuals cross state lines that paperwork is required.

"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence." Thomas H. Huxley

In Oklahoma

you can buy them at garage sales.... :)

~Live life to its fullest, with an open heart, open arms and most important... an open mind~

ATF

Only an ATF agent would float that kind of question. Hmmm?

Daryl

That goes to show ...

Goes to show how much you know about the people that float such questions. Or me. I happen to think it would go along way to disrupt the unconstitutional registration of guns in this country. Don't you? And God knows, I'm no ATF agent.

Double Reply

Just Kidding Mike!

We can't be serious all the time!

Daryl

It's cool...

I posted my response before seeing your Dbl.
Ya gotta admit, it's an interesting concept if enough people would do it.

Hmmm?

How about just locking them up and hiding them.

Mike did you or anyone else ever hear of a story that was out several years ago, it was called Coffin Rock?

I don't have a ready copy, however, it was rather powerful!

I can elaborate if needed.

Daryl

Coffin Rock ?

Coffin Rock... Never did hear it. Is it a story, article, video?

Gee

Gee,

I only asked a little while ago if anyone made anti-taser wear. I love this group, you folks, for a rag tag group, you are really turning into good debate pros and product specialist.

Thanks

Daryl

Hmmmm

It almost sounds like you have realized that five (a majority) unelected, unaccountable, judges dispense "freedom", rather than the illusion that government exists by the consent of the governed.
Welcome.

Bush would need five guys to agree to let him run as a VP-its "illegal" you know.

By the way, I only bare arm in the summer, its just too cold otherwise.

Mike Stahl

Mike Stahl