CNN American Morning

Hey, what did I write a few hours back about McCain going South? The news is that he had a fling with a certain "Vicki Iseman" -- she is not only a good, er, "fling", but also a LOBBYIST! Given the omnipresent immorality in D.C. his adultery seems of little concern... but she is a LOBBYIST -- this dog was sending our tax money to her clients! He should really go to jail. In any case, the campaign of Ron Paul has just been given a shot in the arm... after all, his relationships to lobbyists could never be called a "fling" --

The wobbly voice CNN audio feed bullshit is back! Can't you guys hear that, its subtler this time but his voice is being distorted again by CNN to sound "wobbly" and unattractive. What's this five times this "technicality" has followed RP around when he's on CNN? The Wolf Blitzer appearances are great and I've never noticed this crap when RP is on with him, but every other time pretty much his audio is being messed with. I do not believe for one second anymore that these things are all mistakes and "technical problems", I think some establishment crook in the media has said to his bosses "we can make his voice sound unattractive" and that's what they’re doing here, it seems only limited to almost every other CNN appearance apart from Wolf Blitzer’s Situation Room.

Here's the original post on this from a while back:

CNN DISTORTING RON PAUL’S VOICE!!

Listen to these three consecutive times where Ron Paul has appeared on CNN and had “wobbly voice” sound problems. The first video I noticed this on I thought it was probably coincidental, being some kind of technical problem. What stood out about it though was that this only occurred when Ron Paul was speaking, it wasn’t present in the interview with Joe Biden or with the CNN presenter’s segments, both before and after Ron Paul’s parts. Here’s the first video, Paul comes in after the interview with Joe Biden:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ86O1ou91o

After I saw this “wobbly voice” sound problem reoccur twice then I became suspicious that CNN may have been deliberately trying to make Ron Paul sound strange and unattractive to the audience. Here’s the second video with an interview between Ron Paul and a woman in the CNN studio, notice that the female presenter’s audio feed is normal while only Ron Paul’s is suffering from exactly the same “wobbly voice technicality” as in the first video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SRyNxdQSdw

Here in the third video we can hear exactly same sound problem again, with the interviewer and Ron Paul both sharing the same audio feed and so both having their voices distorted:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-mQQ6rJA7I

WHY does this “sound problem” seem to follow Ron Paul around when he’s on CNN? I am not condemning CNN as a whole here as the Wolf Blitzer appearances have been fantastic and very fair. But this does seem to be a legitimate concern regardless considering the mainstream media’s (and the establishment who it represents) clear bias against Ron Paul and desperation to sideline him.

Here is the address: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/20/paul-vows-to...

He was.

Did you ever wonder what would happen, if either before or after the National RP Convention, that both the economy and the war and McCain went South? Might be quite a "Real" Change. Hillary and Obama will be taking on McCain and tossing a lot of dung in his direction. He deserves all of it. Obama has already brought up McCain's "100-year" war. It is just the start. Suppose McCain begins to alienate folks the way he has so many Republican conservatives (recall the "boos" he received during the recent conservative gathering, the same one in which Paul was cheered). There are other Republicans who cannot endorse him -- such as ex-Sen. Santorum of Pennsylvania. The financial community has its own doubts, not about his instability, but about his financial ability. The army will become close to revolt.. they are, as recently reported, "stretched dangerously thin" (see Huffingtonpost.com). A military setback of major proportions would put an end to the war policy of "The Bombsy Twins" -- McCain and his slippery friend Lieberman. There is also the question of his heath -- which has been put out of sight (but not out of mind). Who could become the Republican Candidate if not McCain? -- Romney is too flip-floppy as it is and would lose even more credibility were he to "re-enter" the race. Huckabee? No way... better than McCain, but might have to quit (finances), and hasn't been even able to fully gain the evangelical vote. As to whatever Democrat comes into place, their party is torn in half, sex and race... the two candidates will fight it out in ever-growing negative manner until neither is seen as acceptable. Paul, by some law of unintended consequences, has been, by being neglected by the MSM, saved from most of the mud-slinging.

What would happen if McCain is dumped? With 8-12% of the vote, and it is growing, the RP folk have at least a fair chance of seeing their man nominated, or if not nominated, then elected...

Yes, an optimistic but not entirely unrealistic scenario.

CNN's included it under the Political Ticker section. I've already left my comment, let's deluge them with comments to show how strong in numbers we are!! Don't wait, they are sometimes very quick in closing comments.