Paul/Nader Ticket??

I remember Nadar to be a good guy. btw, if you haven't seen the clip, look for it on youtube, Nadar was DENIED access to the debates in his presidential run.....even when invited. Croonies met him outside in the parking lot (COPS) and made him leave the convention center.

Remember, the media has lied to us about everything for a long, long time. Google, "Operation Mockingbird".....explains everything.

More fitting

And it's still a bad idea...

Ralph Nader is a socialist. Ron Paul would NEVER ever ever ever ever, join with a socialist because he believes in personal property and economic freedom, socialists including Ralph Nader do not. Paul's ideas run COUNTER to what Nader proposes.

Nader proposed in his speech announcing his run that the problems in America are due to "social injustice" and that he intends to use government to mandate social equality. Ron Paul would balk at such an anti-freedom statement.

How could you possibly not understand?

Vote RON PAUL 2008
_____________
Why play games like this (suggesting Nader -- or anyone)? Doesn't matter who we might think(?) would be the right choice -- that choice simply comes down to who it is RON PAUL would have it be. Are you speaking (doing research) for RON PAUL?

No offense intended. But I see this nothing more than something I personally do each week during the lottery draw -- I daydream. Hasn't changed a damn thing in that regard for me yet. Reality dictates it to be otherwise ;-(

He would never play second fiddle

Nothing personal but I'd suggest a refresher on Ron Paul.

....of creating federal government agencies for every perceived problem is a large part of why things are so bad. Liberals are so sadly mistaken when they do this, because the power that these bureaucratic agencies wield is always seized by the corporations which they in turn use to control their markets. Why Nader and others like him don't seem to get it is beyond me.

Breath some life into this corpse of a campaign. Actually I'd have done that before Super Tuesday.

Buchanan sounds good to me.

The battle isn't with the American people, who would vote for freedom if they knew it were an option, the battle--as you all know--is with the mainstream media doing everything in their power to hide the message.

The U.S. is dead last by our own CIA's estimation of the world's balance sheet comparisons:
h ttps://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2187rank.html
Calls for sound, extreme measures, only one guy offering that, our Dr. Paul.

I don't see it as being strong enough to overcome the media. Nader has been turning into a boon for a while and can't see him really bringing anything to the table that we can actually stand up against the powers that be.

I'm a firm believer that RP's VP needs be nearly ideologicly indentical. So they can't take him out and expect something different.

Right now though if i had to reach across the table and grasp a speculative running mate that i also though could potentially be a winning ticket. I'd say Naomi Wolf. I think it would really take the wind out of HRC sails. The libertyminded brainwashed partyline democrats would be absolutely beside themselves. Anybody snowed over by the idea that Obummer will restore liberty would have to take a listen to what Naomi has to say and that would be our way in.

A pro freedom, small government advocate like Ron Paul is just about the opposite of Ralph Nader who is best described as a fascist/socialist.

"Victory for liberty! That is our goal, and nothing less. -- Ron Paul, December 17, 2007"

Are you for real?

www.ronpaul2008.com

There is life at the end of the tunnel my friends!

and it is a great car!!!!! Nader is an idiot! He also tried to say the vw was unsafe because of it rear engine design but yet it went on to be the #1 selling car of all time! What a faggot. I could just imagine if he was running the country.....