Nader announces run for president
By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Ralph Nader on Sunday announced a fresh bid for the White House, criticizing the top contenders as too close to big business and dismissing the possibility that his third-party candidacy could tip the election to Republicans.
ADVERTISEMENT
The longtime consumer advocate is still loathed by many Democrats who accuse him of costing Al Gore the 2000 election.
Nader said most people are disenchanted with the Democratic and Republican parties due to a prolonged Iraq war and a shaky economy. He also blamed tax and other corporate-friendly policies under the Bush administration that he said have left many lower- and middle-class people in debt.
"You take that framework of people feeling locked out, shut out, marginalized, disrespected," he said. "You go from Iraq, to Palestine/Israel, from Enron to Wall Street, from Katrina to the bungling of the Bush administration, to the complicity of the Democrats in not stopping him on the war, stopping him on the tax cuts."
Nader, who turns 74 later this week, announced his candidacy on NBC's "Meet the Press."
In a later interview with The Associated Press, he rejected the notion of himself as a spoiler candidate, saying the electorate will not vote for a "pro-war John McCain." He also predicted his campaign would do better than in 2004, when he won just 0.3 percent of the vote as an independent.
"This time we're ready for them," said Nader of the Democratic Party lawsuits that kept him off the ballot in some states.
Democratic candidates Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton quickly sought to portray Nader's announcement as having little impact.
"Obviously, it's not helpful to whomever our Democratic nominee is. But it's a free country," said Clinton, who called Nader's announcement a "passing fancy."
Obama dismissed Nader as a perennial presidential campaigner. "He thought that there was no difference between Al Gore and George Bush and eight years later I think people realize that Ralph did not know what he was talking about," Obama added.
Republican Mike Huckabee welcomed Nader into the race.
"I think it always would probably pull votes away from the Democrats, not the Republicans," the former Arkansas governor said on CNN.
Nader said Obama's and Clinton's lukewarm response was not surprising given that both political parties typically treat third-party candidates as "second-class citizens." Nader said he will decide in the coming days whether to run as an independent, Green Party candidate or in some other third party.
Pointing a finger at Republicans, he described McCain as a candidate for "perpetual war" and said he welcomed the support of Republican conservatives "who don't like the war in Iraq, who don't like taxpayer dollars wasted, and who don't like the Patriot Act and who treasure their rights of privacy."
"If the Democrats can't landslide the Republicans this year, they ought to just wrap up," Nader added.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080224/ap_on_el_pr/nader
theres a video also.





















Same old play book
Just trying to draw votes from the Dems to dilute for McStain. Two party system is dead and stinkin!
"This will all end with show trials and piano wire!"
Yes and they somehow got my e-mail
address and spammed me today with their announcement and a link to his website.
brown.fred@gmail.com
Just in case you want to spam someone...ha !
The question is for MSM.
WIll they give him debate time to speak? Last time in 2000 the democrats and MSM said Nader did not get over 10% in the polls and THEREFORE, WAS NOT A FACTOR in the Presidential Race and MSM ignored him. But low and behold he WAS a FACTOR.
So, will he be in our not? I hope so. The MORE THE BETTER I say.
I would love to see a grand debate between these 7 condentors....
Hillary, Obama, McCain, Hucklabee, Paul, Nader, Bloomberg. In such a field, the Get out of Iraq position will be the NORMAL position, McCain would be seen as extreme. Also with this field, with Nader and Paul hammering on Civil Rights, taking an Anti-Patriot Act/Military Commissions Act position, both Obama and Hillary would move to that position. Hucklabee and Bloomberg would try as best they could to strike a middle cord between Paul/Nader on the one side attacking "soft corporate fascism militarism" and Hillary/Huckabee/McCain standing for the Military Industrial Complex.
It would be a Great debate. Love it! The more debates with these 7 the better.
Ron Paul over time will win out the arguments.....
Treg
Why doesn't this knucklehead just vote for Ron Paul
and save himself a lot of expense?
I bet he thinks he's going to get a lot of Paul supporters.
And I bet he's right. Because it appears that a lot of Paul supporters have a left wing perspective on capitalism, like Nader, and unlike Paul.
I am not voting nader.
Don't come here and tell me what my intentions are for posting. This is relevant news to the presidential race. Plus it will help RP get more publicity in the end. Stop putting words into my mouth and get lost if you can't be open minded in factual readings.
Touche'
Don't tell me what my intentions are. My intentions were not to interpret or impugn your intentions. My assumption was that you were a Paul supporters whose intention was just to post intersting news that could affect the Paul campaign. Don't be so suspicious. I wasn't suspicious of your intentions in the slighest. You've read into something that wasn't there.
Knucklehead: Knader
Same guy. Sorry for the confusion and thank you for the post. Ron Paul for President. Ralph can be Raul Castro's running mate next time around.