Why I Don't Support The Ron Paul Freedom March

0 votes

i think this will attract much more attention to dr. paul's message than a march on dc. i think we should all encourage the campaign to support this suggestion. let's all march at the gop convention, with the millions of cameras and television coverage, and show the world how powerful dr. paul's message truly is!

Why I Don't Support The Ron Paul Freedom March
By Devvy
2-29-8

http://www.rense.com/general81/prr.htm

I have been inundated with inquiries and encouragement to participate in an event being called the 'Ron Paul Freedom March.'

http://www.nolanchart.com/article2742.html

Regular readers of my columns know I am a committed supporter to Congressman Paul's run for the White House. However, this is one event I cannot support for the following reasons.

First, let me give you a little history so you can understand why I believe that while this is a feel good exercise, I don't believe it's a good use of human and financial resources.

In 1991, I " woke up" and began my journey of research and activism. In 1993, after nine months of picketing the Federal Reserve in Denver and collecting signatures from around the country, my Project '93 marched on Washington, DC. Back then the Park Police were still using grids and estimated our crowd at 4,400. We delivered 1,763,000 signed petitions to abolish the Federal Reserve and the IRS. Speeches were made. During the rally, we collected another 23,000 signatures for the petition. It was a beautiful day in Washington and every one felt good at the end of the day.

Despite massive efforts, there was NO media. They were following Hillary around the capitol as she was pitching her unconstitutional national health care scheme.

The Clerk of the House wanted to turn my truck load of boxes with those one million seven hundred sixty three thousand petitions over to the Park Police to count and shred. I said in a pig's ear. A handful of my volunteers broke them down and delivered batches to every congressional and senate office. When it was over and done, Congress went about their business of spending us into bankruptcy while the Clinton's continued their agenda. Nothing changed.

Over the years there have been many efforts for marches by patriots. They all fizzle with a couple hundred people. Perhaps it will be different for this effort, but it costs a fortune to go to DC; hotels within 20 miles (except for flea bag transients) cost big bux. One lady named Diane (forget, but was in the mid-'90s) spent a fortune on her march. Did every patriot radio show, sent out flyers for months. In the end, about 150 people showed up. Was anything accomplished by Diane and so many other groups and their 150 or 200 angry fellow Americans standing in front of the capitol? Sadly, no. The exception to these events are the Rolling Thunder vets.

Another thing is the climate in DC. After 911, access to the people's house is now virtually impossible. DC is like a police compound. I know, I've been there several times and I resent being treated like a criminal. Any rally is going to be pushed to their boundaries far away from the capitol while the criminals inside go about their business.

I ask in earnest, what do supporters of this event hope to accomplish?

1. Bush/Cheney do not care if a million people show up, just like the pro-life marches which draw a half million or more each year. Besides, neither will be in town on any date selected, you can be sure of that.

2. The powerful unseen hand that owns Washington, DC, laughs at what they consider puny efforts by 'patriots.' Rockefeller and the rest of the money lenders don't care about this event because they own Congress and the White House. It's just business as usual for them. It won't change until the personnel inside the capitol and the White House are replaced.

3. The dominant media will ignore this event. It might make the local news out of MD and No. Virginia, but that'll be about it.

4. I timed my event for September 29th because I knew Congress would be in full session. The budget has to be done by midnight, 30 Sept, so DC is at maximum activity during that week. Everyone was in town.

5. As Ron Paul is vilified by his own party, those members of Congress who might happen to be in DC that day won't care about this event because they still control the legislative process and right along with the Democrats, do not want a limited form of republican government.

6. I have read two dates for this event: July 4th and June 21st. First of all, no one is in Washington, DC on the Fourth of July except tourists. I know, because I've been there on 4 July and seen a half million people converge on the Washington Memorial. I could hardly wait to get to the airport, the congestion was so bad. Everyone is there for fireworks, corn dogs and beer. Demonstrations in DC are as common as birds singing in the trees. They go on every day from every group you can imagine. "Free Tibet" people sit in front of the barrier lines at the White House. "Let's Dance Naked" folks have their 25 person demonstration and on and on and on. That's Washington, DC. Ho, hum.

Congress is gone, out of town for July 4th. So are the major media because there's nothing to cover for their agenda. As for June 21st, this is the beginning of summer. Families plan for their vacations during June. Yes, they are freedom fighters, but let me give you one example. A friend in Sacramento wanted to go to some patriot event in DC many years ago. It was in June and his wife said, no way. We are taking the kids to Disneyland and that's that. The mouse won out.

Why have a freedom march in a location where the only people there are tourists? The king pins and law breakers (Congress) won't be around and neither will the media.

But, the GOP convention is a whole different situation.
<>

The world media WILL be there.

All the delegates WILL be there.

If vote fraud affected the outcome of the primaries, which I believe is the case, then those delegates cannot be committed to McCain.

I believe we can bring McCain down. All of us should be working to expose this corrupt, evil man and drive him out of the race.

Swift Boating of McCain Long Over Due

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd341.htm

Moral Obligations to Stop McCain

http://www.newswithviews.com/Briley/Patrick47.htm

If we are successful, and I believe we can be, then that puts the GOP power brokers in a tough spot. They will have to draft another neo-con, i.e., Newt, and see if they can sell that stink. It will put their plans in chaos with little time to recover.

You should find out who the GOP delegates are from your state. For California see link below. Call your Secretary of State's office and get their names or go on-line.
http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_delegates08.htm

This is a fluid situation and, as I said, we should work to get a few hundred thousand Ron Paul supporters to that convention. Can you imagine a quarter million Ron Paul supporters surrounding the EXCEL center with 100' long banners: Ron Paul or good-bye GOP! I guarantee you that would be a huge message to the party and more importantly those delegates.

THAT would shake things up and show the power brokers who run that convention that we're not going to take one of their globalists as the nominee. The EXCEL Center sits down town. St. Paul-Minneapolis in September is beautiful AND it's far less expensive than DC. That convention IS the heart beat of the whole race for the White House.

Instead of broke Americans trying to scrape together some money to ride a bus or whatever to go stand in DC to a non audience, why not organize to make the biggest demonstration in the history of this country at that GOP convention? Where the world's media and those delegates will be - who will hear and see you.

This is just my personal opinion. I have budgeted my limited funds for the convention. I will be there because that's where everything will be decided regarding the GOP nomination. It's the big kahuna. As for the position of the City of St. Paul, precedent has already been set; a good legal team needs to be in place when application is made for permits:

City relents, will allow protests during DNC

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=5...

With all due respect, I sincerely hope Congressman Ron Paul changes his mind and decides it would be a far, far better use of human and financial resources to target the convention and not go through with an event in DC this summer. As he has only taken the steps for an 'exploratory committee,' not a lot will be lost. I hope to see you at that convention.

Cordially,

Devvy Kidd
www.devvy.com
devvyk@earthlink.net

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The cameras

The cameras will be inside the convention, not outside..and you won't get anywhere near the site itself..Look up the disasterous 1968 democratic convention

This should be on the front page for further discussion.

I have been to DC many times. It is actually the worst place to hold a protest march--everybody and their grandma is there protesting something. Secret Service is also thick and plenty. I had an encounter with one for simply sitting on the grass to change my camera lens. You can bet the news agencies will ignore us and the time and resources of hundreds (thousands?) of Ron Paul supporters will have been for nothing.

After reading this post, I would have to agree. All eyes will be on the convention and not on DC. The police in St. Paul haven't stocked up with extra tasers for nothing--they're expecting us!

________________

Good luck to us all,

Lisa C.

www.women4ronpaul.com

Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!

Total Agreement

More than 20 million people protested the war before we invaded. There were marches in major cities throughout the world. I marched that day in Santa Cruz. It was the largest anti-war protest in the history of the world. And yes, is was reported in the San Jose Mercury news the following day, one small paragraph, section A, page 26.
It was as if the event never happened. Even we marched on DC with 1/2 million people, the press will not report it. Devvy's idea of marching at the convention is far better, and I for one support it. I hope you do too.

David Cameron

yeah i never even knew

about all that. at the time i was blinded and believed faux news and thought the whole country was on the same page for once (strangely enough) we all thought EVERYONE wanted to KILL THEM ALL. all of us who had the wool pulled over our eyes. no longer. if anything marching at the convention will get the attention of the only people who are going to matter anyway....the delegates.

This movement is bigger than the GOP convention

Tying this young and massive movement to an old and tired GOP is a mistake. I think a strong showing at the convention is newsworthy, but we need to show we are a new and independent force within the GOP. Challenging this diminishes our momentum.

Devvy Kidd Rocks!

She makes a compelling argument, I believe. In my life, I have seen many marches on Washington that ended up accomplishing nothing. I think we should forward Devvy's post here to the HQ and see if we can't convince Dr. Paul to make an announcement to the effect that this is a great idea that goes WAY beyond anything we could accomplish in Washington. All eyes will be on the convention, but just in case any of you have noticed, the Old Media has been putting all of their energy into completely IGNORING Ron Paul and his supporters, and I believe that they would have a fine time doing just that at a Washington march. The Republican Convention, however, will have to be covered. Oh, make no mistake; they will do their damnedest to ignore us there as well, but I think I will follow Devvy on this one.
www.paulforronpaul.com