Federal Reserve: IMPORTANT INFORMATION

0 votes

I do not like the Federal Reserve System we have and I’m against Central Banking.

At the same time, if you are going to discuss this issue with people and convince them, you should know the truth about it because there is a lot of “Conspiracy Theory Nonsense” that is promoted on the internet and if you talk to someone who is educated using this “Conspiracy Theory Nonsense” you will be laughed at like a joke and further embarrass Ron Paul and his movement like the 9/11 Truthers have.

Before you discuss the Federal Reserve, Educate Yourself and Understand both sides.

Check out the following link which I found to be very useful that explains “10 Myths About the Federal Reserve:”

http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/flaherty/Federal_Reserve.html

By: Edward Flaherty, Ph.D. Department of Economics College of Charleston, S.C.

Facts: Yes, the Federal Reserve banks are privately owned, but they are controlled by the publically-appointed Board of Governors. The Federal Reserve banks merely execute the monetary policy choices made by the Board. In addition, nearly all the interest the Federal Reserve collects on government bonds is rebated to the Treasury each year, so the government does not pay any net interest to the Fed.

Facts: No foreigners own any part of the Fed. Each Federal Reserve bank is owned exclusively by the participating commercial banks and S&Ls operating within the Federal Reserve bank's district. Individuals and non-bank firms, be they foreign or domestic, are not permitted by law to own any shares of a Federal Reserve bank. Moreover, monetary policy is controlled by the publically-appointed Board of Governors, not by the Federal Reserve banks.

Fact: Independent accounting firms conduct full financial audits of the Federal Reserve banks and the Board of Governors every year. The Fed is also subject to certain types of audits from the Government Accounting Office.

Facts: The Federal Reserve rebates its net earnings to the Treasury every year. Consequently, the interest the Treasury pays to the Fed is returned, so the money borrowed from the Fed has no net interest obligation for the Treasury. The government could print its own currency independent of the Fed, but there would be no effective safeguards against abuse of this power for political gain.

Facts: The Federal Reserve banks have only a small share of the total national debt (about 7%). Therefore, only a small share of the interest on the debt goes to the Fed. Regardless, the Fed rebates that interest to the Treasury every year, so the debt held by the Fed carries no net interest obligation for the government. In addition, it is Congress, not the Federal Reserve, who is responsible for the federal budget and the national debt.

Facts: Kennedy wrote E.O. 11,110 to phase out silver certificate currency, not to issue more of it. Records show Kennedy and the Federal Reserve were almost always in agreement on policy matters. He even signed legislation to give the Fed more authority to issue currency.

Facts: McFadden was incorrect regarding the Fed costing the government money. However, later economic analysis agrees with him that Federal Reserve policy blunders had a substantial role in causing the Depression. However, his implication that this was done deliberately has no basis in fact. Moreover, for a dozen years prior to his rant, McFadden had been the chairman of the House subcommittee that oversaw the Federal Reserve. Why didn't he do anything to reform or abolish the Fed while he had the chance?

Facts: The banking system is indeed able to create money with a mere computer keystroke. However, a bank's ability to create money is tied directly to the amount of reserves customers have deposited there. A bank must pay a competitive interest rate on those deposits to keep them from leaving to other banks. This interest expense alone is a substantial portion of a bank's operating costs and is de facto proof a bank cannot costlessly create money.

Fact: The term 'lawful money' does not refer to gold or silver coin, but to types of money which the government would permit banks to use when tabulating their reserves. These types of money included, but were not limited to, gold and silver coin.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

More "Facts"

"Facts: Kennedy wrote E.O. 11,110 to phase out silver certificate currency, not to issue more of it. Records show Kennedy and the Federal Reserve were almost always in agreement on policy matters. He even signed legislation to give the Fed more authority to issue currency."

Here is the actual text of the EO:

Executive Order 11110

AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): '(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,' and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

JOHN F. KENNEDY
THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 4, 1963

Also has a good article written apparently after much research into this EO by the The Christian Law Fellowship.

http://www.fdrs.org/executive_order_11110.html
--------------------------
"I killed the banks"

You mean The FRACTIONAL Reserve, right?

The Frac (for short).

"a bank's ability to create

"a bank's ability to create money is tied directly to the amount of reserves customers have deposited there. A bank must pay a competitive interest rate on those deposits to keep them from leaving to other banks. This interest expense alone is a substantial portion of a bank's operating costs and is de facto proof a bank cannot costlessly create money."

Why no mention whatsoever of fractional reserve banking? So what if the ability to create money is "tied" to reserves. When a bank can lend out 10 times its reserves and charge interest on this "money", we have a problem. 8% interest is really 80% when banks can pretend they have 10 times as much as they really do. Do you really think "operating costs" are an issue under this scheme? Bank buildings are some of the most elaborate and expensive buildings in the country, and bankers certainly aren't hurting any. Your source conveniently makes no mention of one of the most glaring issues with the current banking system.

Sorry but

Most of this is probably BS. The fact you accept everything someone says because they have "FACT:" in front of it is ridiculous. SHOW ME why this is an indisputable FACT.

"Fact: The term 'lawful money' does not refer to gold or silver coin, but to types of money which the government would permit banks to use when tabulating their reserves. These types of money included, but were not limited to, gold and silver coin."

Fiat currencies always fail and the citizens always take the brunt of that failure. It is a dishonest monetary system by nature and everyone knows it.

--------------------------
"I killed the banks"

--------------------------
"I killed the banks"

publiceye.org is dedicated to bashing anything that comes from

the right. Far from an unbiased organization.

Minneapolis Mike

I agree

there are far too many links to unreliable sources here to prove points..You can find a source for almost any stance on any issue you want on the Internet..folks use Youtube, where anyone can make up any video for any reason slanted in any direction