Terrorized by the "War on Terror"

There is always ulterior motives...underlying goals. Recently read this Mike Whitney article which, for me, put a new light on all the sabre rattling
over Iran plus those in the House who, unlike Ron Paul, were so hot on pleasing the Bushnics by sending a little scare message to Iran: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17912.htm

I remember when Bill Moyer noted that once on a plane with David Rockefeller he asked him how long the major factions had ruled the world. He said, as long as he could remember because he had grown up with it and, to him, it is just the way things are. I personally believe there are two factions although the differences in opinion within them make it difficult to trace who's who. Many books give clues or even try to lay it out. I used to try like crazy to group them into the good guys and the bad guys....couldn't. I now group them into the bad guys and the worse guys. I feel one is out to destroy the US and one is not. Destroy it as we know it (taking into consideration that what we believe we know is only partially true ) or destroy it completely.

When you read about Quigley and his writings (guru to Hill and Bill), he obviously is not against the elitist except for in one area, ie, he did not believe they should cloak themselves in secrecy. I believe that the education revolution of which many of us are a part may well lead to all of this being in the open. And we aren't alone. A lot of this understanding is
more accessible and discussed in the open in other countries than here where it is all lumped under an equally vile heading...this one one word, i.e. conspiracy.

I don't think for a minute that Dr. Paul is not aware of all of this. He will only have so much wiggle room as the global situation is going to remain that great chessboard, like it or not. But, aligned somewhat (not their pawn) with the faction that does not want the US destroyed, he can go a long way in putting us back together after the dollar and a lot of other things collapse. At such a time we will REALLY need to hear truth, listen to a calm voice and have hope. In my not forgotten " people are basically good" world (notwithstanding that consciously or unconsciously very Luciferian evil thihgs are being done), I believe that when Ron Paul recently said that he could work with the neocons, if they were working for good...there may have been volumes behind that statement. I want to believe that there are some powerful forces (who really could care less if a General Electric or Motorola succeed or fail in the big picture)...some powerful forces that believe Ron Paul is the man for the hour. And, I am going to hang on to that thought . I have to.

"Where is the U.S. leader ready to say, "Enough of this hysteria, stop this paranoia"? Even in the face of future terrorist attacks, the likelihood of which cannot be denied, let us show some sense. Let us be true to our traditions."

That sounds to me more like an endorsement of Ron Paul than Hillary. But maybe thats just my personal bias.

ZB is a globalist elitist, and a collectivist. What everyone needs to know about these guys is whenever they speak publicly, it is to further their agenda, even though he might be appearing to tell the truth. These guys will say anything and do anything to make their dreams of power and glory come true. When they argue in public, it is for a reason. Republican and Democratic parties are simply 2 retail establishments owned by the same company. They foment political division, polarize the electorate and drive them further into their "liberal" or "conservative" strongholds. Either way they win.
---------------------------------
Jim Clark <><
Ron Paul for President!
www.jimclark.net