Ron Paul on Kudlow & Co.

Hi everyone I have a Ron Paul Channel on JTV tell everyone to come visit it at www.justin.tv/critic

Thanks,

Critic

Monetary policy, history and the economy can never be covered in a 30 second interview, and public education guarantees most people won't understand. Everyone has to have a bases of knowledge to even know what he's talking about and most don't. It's not his fault most Americans are idiots. Hopefully their common sense kicks in after hearing him speak and they dig a little deeper. That's why Dr Paul talks about high prices at the grocery store or gas pump. He uses common behavior references so even idiots have to agree. Remember he's talking to mindless drones who have been programmed. His effort is missionary. Hopefully some glimmer of intelligence will walk away and look further.

we can help " http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ "...

If we don't help them, RP can be cheated this November.

The following is an e-mail I got today from BBV:

The video below provides bits of the backstory for our discovery of a potentially devastating method of rigging MAIL IN VOTES, AUDITS and RECOUNTS. Black Box Voting is currently doing proof of concept testing on our "Theory of a crime" and will release details next week on how it's done, so that preventive measures can be put in before November. We'll see how the ballots and the special "optical scan marking pens" being sold by vendors actually perform in our tests. Any information you can provide on the specific paper stock and especially, the paper coatings used by ballot printers will be much appreciated right now.

Information leading up to this discovery came from a frame-by-frame analysis of video, including these:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txoLlfrBENk (pay close attention to the last segment)
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOESAfrPSKI

We believe it is possible to undetectably alter thousands -- possibly tens of thousands -- of paper ballots, using a technique known as "check washing." This would require applicator bottles (for ballot alteration in a vehicle during transport), paper towels, and in central ballot storage locations, for large quantities, cans of odorless paint thinner, denatured alcohol, or acetone. Our upcoming tests will show if our theory is correct, whether it can be done in a van, how many ballots can be done per hour, whether the special "AccuVote marking pens" sold by LHS Associates and Diebold (Premier) are easier to "wash" for remarking.

These two "ELECTION REALITY TV" videos above are prequels; video of our demo will be released next week. Maybe our theory of a crime won't work. We'll see.

The new video, linked above, shows top-level New Hampshire state officials lying about chain of custody matters. In one particularly bizarre incident, they attempt to hide the fact that ballots are sitting right there in an area of the warehouse (at 5:20 pm) that they have emphasized is "closed" at 4:30 pm. When a citizen catches them on video in the "closed" area, they simply deny that the ballot boxes are ballot boxes!

Earlier, they had staged a bit of public theatre in which they made it a point that "Hoppy" of the Butch and Hoppy ballot transport team, will have trouble going back to get his bag because the area is "closed" at 4:30. But after dark at 5:20, a Connecticut citizen named Walter Reddy caught top state officials and Hoppy on film in the very area that was supposed to be "closed", and the next night at 6:54 pm, a Florida citizen named Jeannie Dean caught them again.

Apparently the state officials did not realize the ballot boxes (empty and otherwise) had been caught on video, and after saying "those are not ballots" they hurriedly turned out the lights! Imagining state-level public officials standing there in the dark would be comical if it didn't represent the rape of our democratic republic.

The same boxes identified as "NOT ballots" are later identified, on camera, as Rockingham County ballot boxes, by the same state official who claimed they weren't ballots the night before. Of course, we knew they were ballot boxes, because we followed the ballot pickup van during Rockingham County pickups!

So what did they do? Open it up and deal with ballot intake and chain of custody in a properly public and transparent fashion?

Nope. The next night, New Hampshire state officials engaged the services of a police dog to obstruct citizens from looking in the window -- aROOH-ROOH-ROOH! (Nice doggy.)

Sarasota citizen Jeannie Dean, teeth chattering in the frigid New Hampshire night, zoomed in with a camera and boosted the sound on her video and once again, caught 'em in the act of secretive ballot delivery in the dark, wandering around in areas already proclaimed "closed after 4:30 pm."

"They" included New Hampshire Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan, New Hampshire Archives Director Frank Mevers, Archives Records Manager Brian Burford, and of course, "Butch and Hoppy" -- Armand "Butch" Dubois and Peter "Hoppy" Falzone.

A public records request by Black Box Voting for documents pertaining to the assignment of the K-9 unit has elicited "There are no records." We asked for phone bills, New Hampshire officials have said it will take 90 days to find them. We have asked for checks, credit card receipts, etc. for cleaning supplies, paint thinner, smocks, latex gloves, etc. They say it will take 90 days to find them. (Or find which ones to purge? Guys: We have your stuff on video.)

Much of what I've just told you relates to next week's proof of concept testing. What you will see in THESE videos is the backstory that helped us figure out the mechanics of how a massive ballot-tampering operation could be accomplished with just a few key people.

This project, funded and produced by BLACK BOX VOTING, used the concept of a rolling calvary of experienced citizen voting rights leaders. We collaborated on video targets and shared our videotape. Using combined evidence captured by several different citizens were we able to piece together how the New Hampshire primary could have been stolen.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY AND VOTE SUBSTITUTION: Along with voter eligibility fraud tactics and computer tampering, these will be "all the marbles" this November for mail-in votes (Oregon, Washington: nearly 100 percent; California, Arizona: approx 50 percent; Ohio, New Mexico, approx 30 percent.) Chain of custody and vote substitution can defeat any manual spot-check and, as we saw in New Hampshire, can nuke the validity of any recount.

IS THERE ANY WAY TO SECURE ELECTIONS?

YES. Citizen controls! "Get it right on Election Night." This is not about "bipartisan" observers who are political party operatives and hacks. This is about CITIZEN CONTROLS. Because the instruments of government that we have created, and our votes -- our method of exercising control over the government that we have created -- belong to US, not "them" -- not the government, not political parties. US. U.S. We the People.

AND NOW, ABOUT THOSE COMPUTERS...

Following another investigation, requiring months of diligence and plenty of computer and public records experience, JIM MARCH, JOHN BRAKEY, MICHAEL SHELBY: Maricopa County Arizona have produced an in-depth citizen evaluation: http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/73271.html

The article above provides the overview for a number of issues discovered in the largest location in Arizona, the most systemic -- national in scope -- being their discovery of an illicit component in the Sequoia voting system. Pay special attention to Appendix A in the full report: http://www.bbvdocs.org/sequoia/Maricopa-County-Elections-Rep...

* * * * *

And as for the many locations that still use paperless DREs or fail to audit chain of custody and procedural safeguards, as they say in New York, "fahgeddaboudit." There is no reason whatsoever to trust those elections.

Yes he did! And does anyone notice how frequently the MSM are falling back on these pimply-faced, 22-year-old, wet-behind-the-ears economic Doogie Howsers as ostensible "experts" on these programs? I guess getting them fresh from out of their Ivy-League Keynesian indoctrination, er, education works best for the Powers-that-be now.

Digg / Dugg

Remember the past as you look forward to today..

I just printed those articles to read! You TOTALLY answered my question. I should already have known the answer but I'm behind in my "new education"!! LOL!

Fez! LOL!

that's great!

LOL! I thought she said "Pro-Establishment Shill with no Intelligence or Integrity Whatsoever", but my hearing is not so good.

lol

I got this reply on a thread from RPF.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?p=1362974&posted...
"There were a series of "panics" from about 1873 through 1907, though it was mainly intensified in the 1893-1907 period. The stock market would periodically tank. People would run banks, causing them to fail. Credit would get tight.

At the time, politicians had a grand time blaming the gold standard for this. However, in the cold light of history, there's evidence that these panics were manufactured. This was when leveraged speculation--borrowing money to play the stock market--became a popular pasttime, and good ol' J.P. Morgan was known to instruct his bank and other banks over which he had influence to "call the notes" (demand immediate payback) on people who had borrowed to buy a particular stock he was interested in.

He had that information because they generally used that stock as colateral. This allowed him to play that stock short. Occasionally he would do this not for a particular stock, but for all notes. The years he did this coincide particularly well with this series of "panics". The press and the politicians, of course, pointed fingers and any- and everything but Morgan.

Gross simplification and has my slant in it. To form your own opinion, try researching Panic of 1893, Panic of 1907, J.P. Morgan, William Jennings Bryan's "Cross of Gold" speech." - acptulsa

I can't believe that they put this idiot up to "debate" Ron Paul about the Fed. He either has no clue about the subject he speaks of or he's deliberately spewing disinformation. Bernanke knows what the score is. You can see how uncomfortable he gets when he's testifying on capitol hill and the Committee recognizes the Congressman from Texas. This Shakir guy is a dolt.

Welcome aboard Phantom, the survival of our Constitutional Republic henges on our watch.

And in the end he was smiling, didn't seem too combative to me. He had no ground to stand on and was pretty much admitting it by the look on his face. I love the fact that you said "our Commander in Chief" , I have been saying all along that Dr. Paul is already my president.

i'm with you devoted........let's pound them with e's and calls and faxes...

http://www.congress.org

just type in your zip and get started!

They seem to be a good site and push all of Dr. Paul's legislation. http://www.downsizedc.org/

They don't require you to create an account to send letters, but I would suggest you do so you can send them all the time more easily.....they ask for very little information.