Question: Is it true that Ron Paul will NOT be writing weekly columns for World Net Daily?
Submitted by G Class Stat on Sat, 03/22/2008 - 21:51
I thought he was. But Ive heard rumors that he wont be, and now I dont see his name on their website. WTF?
Also remember to donate on April 1st to the campiagn.
April Fools
»
WND
For the most part I like WND on the whole but it does leans toward the NeoCons insane unconstitutional foreign policies such as Iraq War, which in my belief is non-compatible with Constitutional Conservatism.
Davy C Rockett
http://www.thelibertypost.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com
Davy C Rockett
http://liberty-central.blogspot.com
http://screamfreedom.blogspot.com
http://cystic-fibrosis-symptom.com
http://medical-definitions.com
Weekly Column
As far as I know, anyone can reprint of republish any of the Doctor's columns so long as proper citation of original source is made. I think that some people on both sides if this issue are simply not talking to one another. Cone on children, let's play nice.
WND..
... still links to Dr. Paul's columns. And a dozen or so libertarian, anti-war and anti-bush commentators have been and still are regularly featured...
WND
WND sux. They do run stories against the nau, but they marginalize they ONLY candidate who will actually put an end to the nau. And they boast themselves and being a very "christian" website but, i find them to be the mike huckabee brand of christian, which not very christian at all.
Semper Fortis
http://www.jbs.org/
Semper Fortis
from someone who has dealt with farah ~
Comment from an author:
I've been told that WorldNetDaily is partly financed by media mogul and CFR member Rupert Murdoch. Don't know if it's true, but it wouldn't surprise me. Publisher and editor Joseph Farah, who wasn't interested in publishing the first edition of my book or even in selling my second edition on WND, has supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq since the beginning.
GClass... your assessment of
GClass... your assessment of Farah and WND is dead on! Amen!!!
Thomas Jefferson:
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until t
Farah...
.. has been VERY upfront and open about his STRONG reservations about Huckabee on conservative grounds.
Farah was for Duncan Hunter and now leans towards Ron Paul more than any other candidate.
You have to give them credit for that....
This is WND's side of the story.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=59344
I think..
.. this is just symptomatic of the straining of the libertarians and conservatives to be re-united again.
*** "Reagan Republicans" were a coalition of Goldwater libertarians and traditionalist conservatives in reaction to the liberal and internationalist republicans (bush sr, ford, nixon, rockefeller, etc.)
See Lew Rockwell's explanation
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/020091.html
It's odd that Lew would have
It's odd that Lew would have that attitude since WND publishes his commentary.
WND frequently has commentary from Lew Rockwell, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Baldwin, Jude Wanniski, Jerome Corsi, Vox Day, Ilana Mercer among others.
I can't think of another publication that allows such a balance from all ends of the "conservative" spectrum.
=P
WND
throws bones to the Movement now and then... I am also Boycotting WND along with Drudge after a Decade of loyalty.
Haha...
.. where did the loyalty to Drudge come from? His site has to be one of the most lopsided and biased around as far as being pro-war/pro-bush.
I understand that WND has a majority of pro-Bush pro-war people but I stand by my statement that WND is the most balanced around with respect to accommodating a wide spectrum of all those who choose to hang out under the "conservative" umbrella including libertarian-leaning and old-school Reagan republicans (which Ron Paul is one of).
Do you know of a website that allows a greater balance?
Rense.com
is a good site that cuts to the chase.
Yeah..
.. I read Rense daily but it has the "ufo" and "anti-semite" label on it.
=P
***NOTE: Rense is in my top 2 daily news sites along with www.whatreallyhappened.com but I mostly ignore the ufo/chupacabra stories and I don't think the site is "anti-semite".
Me too
Bro.
Hehe...
B-)
i've come to conclude
Fortune Favors the Bold
that the anti-semite label is essentially meaningless. It could mean actual nazi type stuff, but it is more likely to mean "something the Rothschilds don't like"
Fortune Favors the Bold
Yup...
.. if you criticize Israel or Zionism you are anti-semite. Like if you criticize the Nazi's you are against all german people.
Doesn't work that way...
WND
is a Zionist Neo- Con Shill that is not a friend of Ron Paul.
I wouldn't go that far...
I wouldn't go that far. They have regularly allowed many anti-Bush anti-war persons to contribute.
Lew Rockwell, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Baldwin, Jude Wanniski, Jerome Corsi, Vox Day, Ilana Mercer amongst others.
Contents-wise WND has been the most balanced around.
Farah himself went from pro to anti-bush...
worldnet
Fortune Favors the Bold
wanted exclusive rights to his texas straight talk column. It is an official congressional website. You can't have exclusive rights to it. They didn't understand this, and got pissed.
Fortune Favors the Bold
Thanks
for this explanation. Been wondering what transpired, but didn't want to go dig it out. One thing I knew, Ron Paul was in the right, whatever happened.
They understood it perfectly
it was a smear job
'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'
'Live for yourself, there's no one else more worth living for,
Begging hands and bleeding hearts
Will only cry out for more...'
Why?
WND has always regularly featured anti-war, anti-bush and libertarian commentators including Lew Rockwell himself!
Dude! (or dudette)
Lew Rockwell, Pat Buchanan, Chuck Baldwin, Jude Wanniski, Jerome Corsi, Vox Day, Ilana Mercer mean nothing to you?
Do you know of any other website that allows a greater balance?
("always" and "regularly" doesn't mean 50% of all content -- "featured" means regularly scheduled content)
*** don't twist my statement into "dominated by" -- I am just recognizing they allow other opinion like other publications don't. If I'm wrong then prove it by providing a link to some other site(s) that has a greater balance.