So now the attack from Fred Barnes is that Ron Paul can't win because he doesn't have a 'credible scenario' for winning the primaries. (I know you're scared Fred... don't worry. Everything will be ok.)
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/00...
  |
|
★
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
Let's not give these guys traffic...
I intentionally avoid clicking on negative pieces to avoid driving them up in the ranks... so let's not post them here either...
The Philosophy Of Liberty -
http://www.jonathangullible.com/mmedia/PoL.English.The.Philo...
Who?
Who the hell is Fred Barnes?
One of those 2 Fixed News hacks called the 'Beltway Boys'
The other is Mort Kondracke (sp?)
I see your point,
and I'm not sure it really matters much what the traffic or ranking is. I'm willing to be convinced that some sort of information boycotting is effective. In light of the 'groupthink' effect, I can see an argument for avoiding linking to inimical authors. I wonder though if such behavior on our part isn't implicitly accepting some of the very ideas we oppose.
(And notice how easily I slipped into collectivist language in that last sentence. Who the hell is this 'we' that just popped up?)