Home » Forums » Daily Paul Liberty Forum

Post Carrier Accused of Warning Customer About 'Mail Cover' Surveillance

Submitted by doctor011 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:02
in
0 votes

Federal prosecutors in Detroit say letter carrier Darlene Cry illegally tipped off a postal customer that he was the subject of a "mail cover" -- a form of warrantless surveillance in which the envelope information on every card and letter received is secretly recorded by the Post Office, then passed to federal law enforcement or intelligence officials.
Posted May 2, 2008 08:29 AM PST http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/post-carrier-ac.html

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

She warned him he was being spied on

Submitted by Jim Brown on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 18:19.

Did they have a warrant? No jury conviction ever and it's non-felonious.

"Evil flourishes when good men do nothing."
—Edmund Burke

—

A Republic, If You Can Keep It

Postal Workers take an Oath to Protect and Defend

Submitted by David7 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 17:16.

the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The Postal Inspectors take that oath also.This should be her sole defense.

Read the patriot act II

Submitted by sentinel on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 16:27.

All the government has to do is say that she is a known terrorist even if she isn't and her's and all of our rights in that case don't apply.

—

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !

bump

Submitted by doctor011 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 15:54.

bump

—

If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!

Jury Trial

Submitted by Greg Butko on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:53.

I hope she demands a jury trial. Warrantless searches are a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Congress does not have the power to pass a law that violates the Constitution. I would like to be on that jury.

If law enforcement has probable cause to suspect criminal activity, let them go before a judge and get a warrant. This isn't Nazi Germany yet.

link

Submitted by doctor011 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:39.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/post-carrier-ac.html

—

If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!

WHAT?????

Submitted by Realdeal on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:11.

Need more info, please.

link

Submitted by doctor011 on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:39.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/post-carrier-ac.html

—

If voting could really change things,
it would be illegal. Here is hoping for change!

Any warrantless surveilance ought to be illegal.

Submitted by none on Fri, 05/02/2008 - 14:11.

If you don't have adequate evidence to WARRANT a search, you ought not be able to do so without going to jail yourself.