0 votes

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers?

Interesting... If the link below doesn't work, search youtube for "What motivated the 9/11 hijackers?"


Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Amidst the hullabaloo

Amidst the hullabaloo of the US paving the way to attack yet another 3rd world country Iran, this video may help put into perspectives issues that we need to raise and debate.

apparently 9 of them are alive and well- ask THEM

hell- Get one on Dr Phil and ASK him-they even found one of their passports at ground zero so all he needs is airfare.(probably cost less than Dr Phil paid to bail out that YouTube attack girl) "Our next guest hijacked a plane that flew into tower one" "What motivated you ? ".."yes...and how does that make you feel?"

Its obvious...

They "HATED" Rudi :-P

What you believe too be true, is true too you...

What you believe to be true, is true to you... "until you change your mind"

No hijackers

So obviously remote controlled.
How is it that 9 of the "hijackers' are alive and well today?
To finish the job... demolition explosives.
The NORAD Stand-down

If you don’t get it by now, then you probably never will.... until you see it on Fox or CNN that is.

Hey Archons', we are taking our planet back and there's nothing you can do about it!


Glenn Beck: "No plane hit the Pentagon on September 11th; instead, it was a missile fired by elements from inside the American state apparatus. Yes or no?"

Ron Paul: "No. It's preposterous."

Beck: "The planes that hit the World Trade Center towers were remotely controlled."

Paul: "[Shaking his head no and shugging his shoulders] I mean this is just bizarre. I've not even heard these challenges before."


You are forgiven...

I am sure Ron Paul would forgive you for having doubts about the impossible and crazy "official" conspiracy theory.

If I were in Dr. Paul’s position I too would stay WELL CLEAR of any 911 debate. He has some pretty big fish to fry as it is.

Good luck in your search for the truth BillyDee, I am sure the light will turn on for you eventually :)

Hey Archons', we are taking our planet back and there's nothing you can do about it!

I agree with Dr. Paul, focus on the cure, not the apathy.

A couple of years ago I went to Honduras for two months. I was completely out of the "news" loop. Upon my return, I had to re-orient myself, you know, like listening to stuff about UFO's and chemtrails, and GMO and poison and 9/11 and the destruction of the planet and dumbed down people . . . well, it is very depressing. For two weeks I was in "re-entry mode".
But through the maze, comes my perception of the truth. The outcome after two weeks of paranoia, I become better at sorting through the propaganda and began seeking out the cure. However, it is an on going process of enlightenment, but after two weeks of painfully opening your eyes and ears, a person should become active and donate your time, money and skills. . . and become happy you are part of the cure. This is your reward! That's why I read the Daily Paul . . . daily. I congratulate all, for your courage and individual investigation of truth.

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”



I agree with Dr. Paul's explanation

They attacked us because they were upset about our troop presence on their "holy lands." The WTC attack was an attempt by the radical Islamic terrorists to terrorize Americans to demand that our government pulling our troops out of the region. As Dr. Paul pointed, out Bin Landen cited our bases in Saudi Arabia as a reason for the attack. There may have been other reasons for them not to like us, but what took them over the edge of going through the trouble of coming over here was our presence there. They view us as trying to eliminate Islam over there, so it's easy to recruit hijackers to give their lives to save Islam by coming here and killing innocent Americans in order to send a message.

USA Military Officers Challenge Official Account of September 11

IF you can't get the news here, go to Pakistan


(courtesy of Rense - he does get some good ones)


The hijackers hated our

The hijackers hated our freedoms and wanted us to pass the Patriot Act. They succeeded.

Thomas Jefferson 1796, 1800, 1804; James Madison 1808, 1812; Ron Paul 1988, 2008, 2012; Rand Paul 2016.

That leads to the REAL question..Galileo

If it is OUR Govts. policy to NEVER DEAL or make deals with "terrorists".
Why is it that we are LOSING our freedoms if they(the terrorists) hate us for them??
Why are we having to give up liberty for security? Because of tyranny. The SAME tyranny that existed when our forefathers were alive. Hence the birth of the Constitution,and Bill of Rights.
We are faced with the same choices they were in their day,as I see it.

The Second Amendment
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security

WELL said


Its like our President says,

Its like our President says, They hate freedom, thats the one and only reason..... bahahahaahah (sorry couldn't keep a straight face while saying it)

He needs to be required to define "Freedom"

before he's allowed to leave the US


What 9-11 hijackers? Until

What 9-11 hijackers?

Until there's a real investigation, I'm not making assumptions. In case you haven't noticed the US government doesn't have very much credibility.

Official story: Sinking of the Maine--Cover-up

Official story: Sinking of the Lusitania--Lies.

Official story: Pearl Harbor--Suspicious Cover-up

Official story: Gulf of Tonkin--Lies

Official story: JFK Assassination--Lies

Support the Constitution of the United States

9/11 jury time

The demolition of the three (3) WTC buildings on 9/11 is so obvious that if enough people insist on a public viewing of WTC7 building falling at freefall speed, we might have a few neo-cons indicted before September.

Culture is Religion externalized.

What if it is discovered that WTC 7 was detonated?

Why would you then first assume that the government did it, instead of the radical Islamic terrorists?

nah baby it was the easter bunny

billydee, you bad bad boy, back to stirring up troubles on DP hey? ive a mind to turn you over my knee.


The "cough" "cough" terrorists wouldn't have had the free access (free roaming of the buildings) to set demolition charges as would others less conspicuous.

Its my understanding that it takes weeks to set 'em up. Unlike the actual bombing of one of the Towers way back when.


would they have any less free access than people from the government? The WTC was not government property, you know?

And whether it would be people from the government or someone else, why would it take any less time for the government, if that's what you're suggesting?

I take it you disagree with Dr. Paul's explanation, that it was blowback? That's a pretty huge element of his campaign, so it's odd that you would disagree with him on this and still support him.

Well maybe...


truth liberate


"Why would they have any less free access than people from the government?"

Excellent question!

Marvin Bush and his cousin,

Marvin Bush and his cousin, Walker.

Culture is Religion externalized.

Yeah, Good Point

I've seen a report of that on one of the movies or documentaries rather.

Is this just oh-so-too-obvious or what, that it throws us off.

Determining WHO did the deed

Determining WHO did the deed is a matter for thorough investigation. The fact is that the "offical" nonexplanation is not plausable. The "blowback" explanation is a comment on American interventalism. Paul is distancing himself from any 9/11 "conspiracy" stuff because it is too hot. Soon a majority may see the falacy of the "official myth". Marvin Bush (George's younger brother) provided security for the WTC complex.

Culture is Religion externalized.

Your assumption appears to be that

Dr. Paul secretly believes it was an inside job. Is that your position? If so, do you have any evidence at all that he believes it was an inside job?

I don't know what he

I don't know what he believes. He appears to evade the isuue, as he did on one of the debates. The only time I've seen Paul dance around an issue, I might add.

Culture is Religion externalized.

He doesn't evade it here:


He explicitly says over and over that 9/11 was not an inside job.


Noam Chomsky, is intelligent enough to dismiss 9/11 Truth and gives a great explanation of why it is so ridiculous (Note to Truthers who have problems with reading: this link is a VIDEO!).

He didn't answer anything directly. Bunch of blabber about his own personal beliefs.