WEATHER CHANNEL FOUNDER: 'I ask Al Gore, where's the global warming?'
Long Post, but worth the read...
WEATHER CHANNEL FOUNDER: 'I ask Al Gore, where's the global warming?'
John Coleman
KUSI News
Friday, June 13, 2008
You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas. It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline. All this big time science, international meetings, thick research papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of planet Earth. What an amazing fraud; what a scam.
The future of our civilization lies in the balance.
That’s the battle cry of the High Priest of Global Warming Al Gore and his fellow, agenda driven disciples as they predict a calamitous outcome from anthropogenic global warming. According to Mr. Gore the polar ice caps will collapse and melt and sea levels will rise 20 feet inundating the coastal cities making 100 million of us refugees. Vice President Gore tells us numerous Pacific islands will be totally submerged and uninhabitable. He tells us global warming will disrupt the circulation of the ocean waters, dramatically changing climates, throwing the world food supply into chaos. He tells us global warming will turn hurricanes into super storms, produce droughts, wipe out the polar bears and result in bleaching of coral reefs. He tells us tropical diseases will spread to mid latitudes and heat waves will kill tens of thousands. He preaches to us that we must change our lives and eliminate fossil fuels or face the dire consequences. The future of our civilization is in the balance.
With a preacher’s zeal, Mr. Gore sets out to strike terror into us and our children and make us feel we are all complicit in the potential demise of the planet.
Here is my rebuttal.
There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.
Through all history, Earth has shifted between two basic climate regimes: ice ages and what paleoclimatologists call “Interglacial periods”. For the past 10 thousand years the Earth has been in an interglacial period. That might well be called nature’s global warming because what happens during an interglacial period is the Earth warms up, the glaciers melt and life flourishes. Clearly from our point of view, an interglacial period is greatly preferred to the deadly rigors of an ice age. Mr. Gore and his crowd would have us believe that the activities of man have overwhelmed nature during this interglacial period and are producing an unprecedented, out of control warming.
Well, it is simply not happening. Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years. So, I ask Al Gore, where’s the global warming?
The cooling trend is so strong that recently the head of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had to acknowledge it. He speculated that nature has temporarily overwhelmed mankind’s warming and it may be ten years or so before the warming returns. Oh, really. We are supposed to be in a panic about man-made global warming and the whole thing takes a ten year break because of the lack of Sun spots. If this weren’t so serious, it would be laughable.
Now allow me to talk a little about the science behind the global warming frenzy. I have dug through thousands of pages of research papers, including the voluminous documents published by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I have worked my way through complicated math and complex theories. Here’s the bottom line: the entire global warming scientific case is based on the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the use of fossil fuels. They don’t have any other issue. Carbon Dioxide, that’s it.
Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.
The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper. One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up in this global warming frenzy. Revelle’s paper linked the increases in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled CO2 as a greenhouse gas.
Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.
All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a significant greenhouse gas. It is not.
Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it. And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.
Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t.
The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer models they say prove those theories. They present us with a concept they call radiative forcing. The research organizations and scientists who are making a career out of this theory, keep cranking out the research papers. Then the IPCC puts on big conferences at exotic places, such as the recent conference in Bali. The scientists endorse each other’s papers, they are summarized and voted on, and viola, we are told global warming is going to kill us all unless we stop burning fossil fuels.
May I stop here for a few historical notes? First, the internal combustion engine and gasoline were awful polluters when they were first invented. And, both gasoline and automobile engines continued to leave a layer of smog behind right up through the 1960’s. Then science and engineering came to the environmental rescue. Better exhaust and ignition systems, catalytic converters, fuel injectors, better engineering throughout the engine and reformulated gasoline have all contributed to a huge reduction in the exhaust emissions from today’s cars. Their goal then was to only exhaust carbon dioxide and water vapor, two gases widely accepted as natural and totally harmless. Anyone old enough to remember the pall of smog that used to hang over all our cities knows how much improvement there has been. So the environmentalists, in their battle against fossil fuels and automobiles had a very good point forty years ago, but now they have to focus almost entirely on the once harmless carbon dioxide. And, that is the rub. Carbon dioxide is not an environmental problem; they just want you now to think it is.
Numerous independent research projects have been done about the greenhouse impact from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. These studies have proven to my total satisfaction that CO2 is not creating a major greenhouse effect and is not causing an increase in temperatures. By the way, before his death, Roger Revelle coauthored a paper cautioning that CO2 and its greenhouse effect did not warrant extreme countermeasures.
So now it has come down to an intense campaign, orchestrated by environmentalists claiming that the burning of fossil fuels dooms the planet to run-away global warming. Ladies and Gentlemen, that is a myth.
So how has the entire global warming frenzy with all its predictions of dire consequences, become so widely believed, accepted and regarded as a real threat to planet Earth? That is the most amazing part of the story.
To start with global warming has the backing of the United Nations, a major world force. Second, it has the backing of a former Vice President and very popular political figure. Third it has the endorsement of Hollywood, and that’s enough for millions. And, fourth, the environmentalists love global warming. It is their tool to combat fossil fuels. So with the environmentalists, the UN, Gore and Hollywood touting Global Warming and predictions of doom and gloom, the media has scrambled with excitement to climb aboard. After all the media loves a crisis. From YK2 to killer bees the media just loves to tell us our lives are threatened. And the media is biased toward liberal, so it’s pre-programmed to support Al Gore and UN. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The LA Times, The Washington Post, the Associated Press and here in San Diego The Union Tribune are all constantly promoting the global warming crisis.
So who is going to go against all of that power? Not the politicians. So now the President of the United States, just about every Governor, most Senators and most Congress people, both of the major current candidates for President, most other elected officials on all levels of government are all riding the Al Gore Global Warming express. That is one crowded bus.
I suspect you haven’t heard it because the mass media did not report it, but I am not alone on the no man-made warming side of this issue. On May 20th, a list of the names of over thirty-one thousand scientists who refute global warming was released. Thirty-one thousand of which 9,000 are Ph.ds. Think about that. Thirty-one thousand. That dwarfs the supposed 2,500 scientists on the UN panel. In the past year, five hundred of scientists have issued public statements challenging global warming. A few more join the chorus every week. There are about 100 defectors from the UN IPCC. There was an International Conference of Climate Change Skeptics in New York in March of this year. One hundred of us gave presentations. Attendance was limited to six hundred people. Every seat was taken. There are a half dozen excellent internet sites that debunk global warming. And, thank goodness for KUSI and Michael McKinnon, its owner. He allows me to post my comments on global warming on the website KUSI.com. Following the publicity of my position form Fox News, Glen Beck on CNN, Rush Limbaugh and a host of other interviews, thousands of people come to the website and read my comments. I get hundreds of supportive emails from them. No I am not alone and the debate is not over.
In my remarks in New York I speculated that perhaps we should sue Al Gore for fraud because of his carbon credits trading scheme. That remark has caused a stir in the fringe media and on the internet. The concept is that if the media won’t give us a hearing and the other side will not debate us, perhaps we could use a Court of law to present our papers and our research and if the Judge is unbiased and understands science, we win. The media couldn’t ignore that. That idea has become the basis for legal research by notable attorneys and discussion among global warming debunkers, but it’s a long way from the Court room.
I am very serious about this issue. I think stamping out the global warming scam is vital to saving our wonderful way of life.
The battle against fossil fuels has controlled policy in this country for decades. It was the environmentalist’s prime force in blocking any drilling for oil in this country and the blocking the building of any new refineries, as well. So now the shortage they created has sent gasoline prices soaring. And, it has lead to the folly of ethanol, which is also partly behind the fuel price increases; that and our restricted oil policy. The ethanol folly is also creating a food crisis throughput the world – it is behind the food price rises for all the grains, for cereals, bread, everything that relies on corn or soy or wheat, including animals that are fed corn, most processed foods that use corn oil or soybean oil or corn syrup. Food shortages or high costs have led to food riots in some third world countries and made the cost of eating out or at home budget busting for many.
So now the global warming myth actually has lead to the chaos we are now enduring with energy and food prices. We pay for it every time we fill our gas tanks. Not only is it running up gasoline prices, it has changed government policy impacting our taxes, our utility bills and the entire focus of government funding. And, now the Congress is considering a cap and trade carbon credits policy. We the citizens will pay for that, too. It all ends up in our taxes and the price of goods and services.
So the Global warming frenzy is, indeed, threatening our civilization. Not because global warming is real; it is not. But because of the all the horrible side effects of the global warming scam.
I love this civilization. I want to do my part to protect it.
If Al Gore and his global warming scare dictates the future policy of our governments, the current economic downturn could indeed become a recession, drift into a depression and our modern civilization could fall into an abyss. And it would largely be a direct result of the global warming frenzy.
My mission, in what is left of a long and exciting lifetime, is to stamp out this Global Warming silliness and let all of us get on with enjoying our lives and loving our planet, Earth.





















Pollution and Warming are different things
People like Al gore have used them interchangably and it is criminal. His tactics are nothing short of terrorism and fearmongering. Notice where the big money is.....is the big money going into the people who are calling it a fraud or is the big money going into the globalist warming scientists who get recognition and funds from promoting it. It is a fraud just like every other "global" agenda. The best way to affect change is locally with your own two hands. Warming is a tool of globalization and world government, nothing less. Pollution is real and can be dealt with by you. Warming is something governments love to impletment control. Don't be fooled, I would expect more of Ron Paul supporters who think critically. Sun activity is the number one factor by an overwhelming margin in determining the temperature on planets, and when there are more sunspots and activity they rise, it happens on mars too and there are no SUV's there. We can clean up the earth but not by lying.
Over 31,000 scientists have put their reputation on the line to dispute these ridiculous claims.
http://oism.org/pproject/
"The wicked flee when no man pursueth, but the righteous are as bold as a lion."
"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com
I am sick to death....
of the havoc wrought in the past 35 years or so by a pack of UNELECTED and ACCOUNTABLE TO NO ONE "environmentalists" who have been dictating policy on how we should all live in this once free country. They don't want us to use our oil or drill for it, they don't want us to use coal, they don't want us to have nuclear power, they have helped facilitate the "lock-up" of millions of acres of lands once in private hands and made it untouchable by the citizens of this country.....and on and on! These people should be exposed and shown for what they truly are....socialists/communists! Rout them out and prosecute them all along with our subservient congress as they don't deserve to be a part of a free society!
While these unelected have been burrowing behind the scenes for at least the past 50 years usurping our laws such as what we can do with our own property, our supposed wasteful lifestyles, etc., they have CONVENIENTLY IGNORED far more significant threats to humanity. How about our poisoned, genetically modified - thank you Monsanto!, cancer causing "food" laced with thousands of chemicals and artificial ingredients that no barnyard animal should even be fed, the fluoride-laced water that has been FORCED upon an ever increasing amount of municipalities often without their permission for the past 40 plus years, the very questionable substances being dumped upon us without our permission from the skies - CHEMTRAILS, the aerial spraying of toxic insecticides such as that sprayed over Long Island during evening rush hour back in the 90's for "eradication" of the West Nile mosquito that caused the death of probably less than 20 people, the poisonous FORCED vaccinations, the thousands of perscription drugs taken by people ordered by doctors too lazy to learn how the human body works and really treat it without harm instead of pushing the chemical poisons now finding their way into our water....hmmm.....mercury in fish from the perscription drug-poisoned humans running off into the groundwaters, all the poisons for us flowing into our water supply killing the fish? What of our manufactured poisons and toxic insecticides are harming the bees, the bats, etc.? ALL of this is conveniently ignored by these phony "environmentalists"!
Like the scissors where the blades are controlled by one hand, we have also not been "allowed" to develop the electric car and other cleaner technologies that would benefit us because of the control by the oil companies as they are not without fault here also. There was always that great genius - American inventiveness, but having had our hands tied over the generations because it may give a monopoly some competition has also led to our current predicament.
Take a look at the agenda of who is behind this "green" movement....even the past leader of the Soviet Union himself - Mr. Gorbachev! Can anyone say that these people do without as they wish for us, or are they in fact living in the lap of luxury on the backs of all the serfs they wish to control. The key word is CONTROL....Freedom will be wiped out...a distant memory! We, a once free people have been conditioned over the years to live on less due to the created and nonexistant shortages and now the environmental agenda promoted by whoever stands to gain from the crisis of the moment.
Good idea! Start with Al Gore being put on trial!
"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom." Patrick Henry
esh
I live in San Diego. This guy is crazy. That aside, "global warming" is a convenient name for "climate change." Fundamentally, there are changes afoot due to human intervention. People say, the earth will regulate, or "it's a natural cycle." Whatever. 'The earth will be fine." Yeah, it will. That doesn't mean people can't make it a hellish place to live by ruining what is, by all accounts, a rare paradise in the universe. Isn't it obvious that humans can f*** it up quite easily?
I'm quoting this:
The three-day grounding of all American air traffic after September 11, 2001 created a natural experiment for studying contrails' effects. Researchers discovered that the absence of contrails expanded the difference between daytime and nighttime temperatures by a full degree Celsius, compared with the average of the last three decades. The difference was even greater in Cascadia and other heavy-air-traffic, mid-latitude regions (see endnote 5). Apparently, contrails dampen natural temperature variations.
---end quote
There are other mechanisms causing fluctuations in both directions. Right now we are in a delicately balanced dynamical system. Too much push in one direction and the whole system might adjust. To think that humans can't impact the planet because it's "too big" is a convenient denial. The general theory is that gas emissions are heating things up while diesel particulates and jet exhausts are cooling things down. Keep on pumping this stuff into the air. See what happens.
And what I mean by "I live
And what I mean by "I live in San Diego" is that I watch this guy do the weather every night and it's freaky.
If you don't believe that
If you don't believe that industry in someway has fundamental damaged the natural ecosystem of earth, there is something wrong with you. However, I am not stanch advocate for the social movement of global warming. I think most of those people are just as bad as those fighting against the idea. What is important is not whether the earth is heating up or the poles melting or that those things aren't actually happening, but rather that the lifestyle as a result of advances from the industry is an unhealthy lifestyle. The fact that the earth is heating up and changing isn't inherently a problem. The earth will adapt and/or correct itself (to a point for sure). The problem is our destructive behavior.
IMHO
I don't think the author is against stopping pollution but argues that Fear Uncertainty and Doubt have been used to put us in this financial pinch we all face today. I feel the author is trying to bring attention to the lies being told about global warming to all of the people who really care about the planet and are against pollution. There is always more than one way to do things and anything that can be done for the environment is better than one against but but choices made based on lies will never have a positive contribution. His argument is to me like the one Ron Paul makes about going after WMDs that don't exist, two wrongs don't make a right.
Okay, cool. I didn't
Okay, cool. I didn't completely read the article either but got the gist of it. So I understand completely if that is real point. I was also partly just expressing my own opinion on the rhetoric about the problem with our environment and that that is more a manifestation and symptom of the destructive reality of our own human behavior.
Doc,
Are you aware that we are suppose to post a portion of the article, then the link to same?
What you believe to be true, is true to you... "until you change your mind"
I don't believe in global
warming either, but this one point worries me:
"Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t."
I think he make a huge leap of faith to say a trace component cannot have an effect. The chain is only as strong as the weakest link. Take our bodies. Our bodies are costantly changing internally depending on micronutrients; have too many or have not enough. If it doesn't we get sick. Why would it be different for the planet?
ok your right about trace elements
being important but please also remember the role this trace element plays in the circle of life. Where does 90% of the oxygen we breath come from? plankton produces it by absorbing co2. So what happens when you add more co2 to the equation, you get more plankton and more oxygen but that should be expected since their are much more people now who create the co2 and consume the oxygen. Does the extra oxygen have an impact, I'm sure it changes something but could it explain how we survive the other pollutants in the air? The co2 is required to support plants and the ocean that we require to live so lets not focus on the wrong trace element. We should be looking at everything that is not part of the circle of life first before we tamper with one of the very things we depend on to survive.
I wasn't looking at
any particular trace element. I was just stating that I thought it was a dangerous statement to claim that trace element cannot have an effect on the environment in which we live. That's all.
crisis and problems are
crisis and problems are created by those in power in order to pass laws that restrict the freedoms and liberty of us lowly peasants!
for me and my home, we shall worship the LORD
“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)
Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐
peasants?
If you so choose to relegate yourself to such a lowly position when in fact your a king on your own property, how do you propose to change things? I'm sorry if my post seems offensive but you can not demand from a position of subject or serf. You are given your rights from God, who are you to deny God's gift? Who is in charge is based on your beliefs, if you believe its them then they will always rule you. May God bless you.
Regards