Someone who Will never get one donated dollar from me

For Paulette!

if you listened closely it was Neil Cavuto's question, he raised the issue and NOT Barr. On the question whether Paul would give some of his millions left to Barr, Barr responded - correctly - that they have their own online campaign, some of whom have worked for Paul earlier, which is true.
Barr was not arrogant at all. It is Neil Cavuto that asked these questions.

Barr should show confidence about receiving votes from the Paul, and he knows he has to work. Sure he does not have Dr. Paul's voting record, but represents - since 2004 - basically the same as Dr. Paul. Barr does not strike me as an arrogant person at all (but Root is very much arrogant and I do not trust him, but he will luckily not play any significant role and should concentrate on the online poker player vote).

The Campaign for Liberty is the most important. For those who want to contribute, it is perhaps the best to split your contributions to C4L and to Barr, e.g. not all to Barr. With the C4L we can actually be successful in getting a few Ron Paul congressmen and women elected this year, though a good showing by Barr is also important.

I am organizer of 2 RP meet up groups and none and I mean zero of the members will support Barr. Baldwin has way more support that Barr but not one member said they were budging from the Ron Paul strategy.

How did he "[act] as though he was 'due'" anything? He never said anything like that. Your interpretation -- made without even offering a link for people to judge for themselves -- is a complete stretch made just to give you an opportunity to spew divisive nonsense. He never said anything about "trolling" -- he said he was reaching out through the internet. Stop exaggerating. Your bias is clear.

What we need is not obnoxious, divisive attacks on legitimate "post-Paul" options. What we need is people to come together and focus on making our strength felt in November and beyond. While we may not be able to have "unity" behind one candidate, we must have civility. Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, "none of the above;" these are not the enemies. These are our allies. A friendly, reasoned debate is OK. Drivel where you fabricate/exaggerate multiple things, and then throw in your loaded words like "pompous," "assuming," and "trolling," are not welcome.

I'll say no more on this, because I don't want this type of infighting "bumped." May this thread die, along with the vitriol being spewed.

If that was indeed what he said, than yes, that's a very shameful attitude.

Rather than being welcoming and begging, if anybody is being arrogant and assuming, they've lost my support (at least financially).

(Excuse me? that's how Obama and Romney lost my support in the first place)