Sheriff highest law enforcement authority
Submitted by meekandmild on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 18:17
"If a sheriff doesn't want the Feds in his county, he has the Constitutional power and Right to keep them out -or- ask them to leave -or- retain them in custody."
The duly elected sheriff of a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county. He has law enforcement powers that exceed that of any other state or federal official.
http://earthhopenetwork.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=527
»
The Sheriff Project
http://www.usa1911.com/scm/index
Check it out!
_____________________________________
Who gives a cluck. Just make it a clean egg-sit.
old
but good
Excellent choice
my friend...one I think of almost daily.
Sheriff highest authority links are disaperring.
Links that I have accessed in the passed referring to the Sheriff as the highest law enforcement authority are not viewable. I get messages like wrong address, site has been taken down, article no longer available.What is happen to these sites?
Editor's article - "Do we really need to elect the sheriff?"
Yep. He was putting forward the viewpoint that we could do just as well hiring a qualified law enforcement officer, just like we hire the chief of police. "What expertise does the voting public have, anyway, to be able to choose a qualified law enforcement person?" Gag. Be watching for this, people, this may be the next thing being pushed .... ahem, quietly, of course.
Sheriff Mack has a sticky in RPF
There is a sticky in RPF that Sheriff Mack will answer your questions. He has already answered some that were discussed here if ya want to know for sure.
True
You are correct, the sheriff is the highest constitutional enforcer of the law and if you can get through to your sheriff, you are on the best track.
However, you forgot the other constitutional officer - US Marshal. Not the fed, not the others but US Marshal.http://www.usmarshals.gov/
Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/
http://v1-p.com/
Detective Krum Investigates:
http://victory1project.wordpress.com/
Sheriff Mack has a book for sheriffs
http://www.sheriffmack.com/index.php/books-by-richard-mack .... tells them what power they have
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master... George Washington
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master... George Washington
Be a good book to check out
.
Bump
for revival...
Berwick, Columbia County, Pennsylvania
Ron Paul 2012 - The People's Choice
rEVOLution SuperPAC: http://www.revolutionpac.com/
WTP Federal Lawsuit to BAN ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2011-07-26...
Maybe a good time to revive this one
because of MAIC and Missouri state Highway Patrol.
Elected Sheriffs willing to claim their authority
write an letter to the editor of your stating cases. Arrange a debate going with the persons running for sheriff. See if the will stand there constitutional grounds according to the 10 amendment and US court rulings.
Im a bailbondsman here in
Im a bailbondsman here in cleveland (moving to san diego area in 3 weeks) and the law up here states that the only individual that can arrest a sheriff is the county coroner. weird
An Eye for an Eye will ONLY make this world go blind~Ghandi~
It's that way in
Colorado, too. The county coroner in Douglas County, CO used to rib the sheriff about that. The sheriff didn't have a sense of humor.
It seems that this is a
It seems that this is a biweekly thread topic here. While it may be a pleasant fiction, its just that, fiction.
This myth stems from a case in the 1990s where the INS raided the home of two people in Jackson County who were here legally and were harboring no illegals. The couple who were raided asked the sheriff to make sure that it didn't happen again. To do that he presumably said these things, though I've never been able to see the source. There are a number of versions of the false story floating around but most include a federal judge ruling in favor of the sheriff, usually with quotes from the judge. This is where the story really goes into fairy tale land. There is no record of the case anywhere and no name for the judge is ever given. How can a story be legit with no case record and no judge's name?
I really wish people would stop bringing this up. I'm not attacking anyone. I learned this by posting a similar thread months back, doing the research on the election process for sheriffs and looking for the legal backing to the articles' claims. Its a fraud. By all means run , help people run for sheriff in your county or drop off Constitutional materials, but don't expect to have gained a magical position where you can use existing case law to ward off the Feds.
Stuff like this is what gives people in the movement a bad name for being nuts. Do the research and you will find that what I said is, unfortunately, correct.
"Freedom suppressed and again regained bites with keener fangs than freedom never endangered." -- Cicero
Please let us know where to
Please let us know where you looked. It seems you want to claim foul but give us no background.
It took me all of ten minutes to find this case online: http://www.potowmack.org/pzmack.html
I have the cases at home but am at work so I decided to see what I can find. This is the first case filed by Sheriff Mack. The Wyoming case is real. and there is an Idaho case that Idahoans followed in their news several years back. Also an Arizona case were local authorities removed federal agents.
You also show your lack of experience dealing with courts on constitutional and freedom issues. Courts often seal cases so they do not show up in clerks records or databases so they cannot be used as precedence for other cases especially when a patriot wins. I know this first hand and other patriots will testify to this also.
Bottom line we are not dealing with article 3 constitutional courts we are dealing with administrative law courts who use case law and maritime law and sometimes even make it up as they go and do not use lawful statute as they are supposed to. People have actually been told in these courts not to bring up the constitution again under threat of sanction. Don't believe me next time your in a court room for any reason ask the judge if your in an article 3 constitutional court.
Heres some more articles that mention the Idaho sheriff and a few others and what been going on with Sheriffs vs feds:
http://www.rangemagazine.com/archives/stories/winter03/badge...
http://outside.away.com/outside/magazine/1297/9712disppower....
-----
Prepare For the Coming Storms, Join New FreelandersSelf Reliance & Preparedness Forums
-----
End The Fat
70 pounds lost and counting! Get in shape for the revolution!
Get Prepared!
Get sheriffs educated.
They need lots of DVDs. Don't be afraid to hand them some evidence. Exhibit A,so to speak.
The sheriffs are the last vestige of local authority. We must make friends with them.
*********************************************
The Second Amendment
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security
Get Sherriffs elected
that know the constitution, and will work for "we the people" and throw the feds out of their counties.
*
*
Run for Sheriff
throw the feds out of your county, like homeland security, IRS, DEA, FBI, CIA, ect.
Like Richard Mack?
He's the CEO of CopperCards which is suppose to go live today but I think they are having technical difficulties.
http://www.coppercards.com/about/about_coppercards.htm
Commission on Presidential Debates - http://www.debates.org/pages/sitesel.html
National Ballot Access - http://www.directdemocracy.com/
Voters for none of the above - http://nota.org/
Black Box Voting - http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."
Get Sheriffs elected
that will throw out the feds in your county
check it out
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" and "Operation Daily Paul"
on revolutionbroadcasting.com
or visit www.mikeandjake.com
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom"
visit www.mikeandjake.com
Ron Paul Sheriffs ...bump!
This could be the quickest way to get our freedoms back! Elect Ron Paul Sheriffs!
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom" and "Operation Daily Paul"
on revolutionbroadcasting.com
or visit www.mikeandjake.com
Mike
"Fire Team for Freedom"
visit www.mikeandjake.com
Do ya feel lucky, Punk
do ya?
Sheriff Election
I am currently involved in an upcoming write-in campaign for our Ron Paul Sheriff who lost the primary by 38 votes. Why did he loose, why most folks believed he was a shoe-in so they didn't go vote. Only 24% turnout. Now they are coming out of the woodwork to support the write-in campaign. It has been a wake-up call for many who don't vote in the primaries.
Voluntary Association + Mutual Cooperation + 110% Personal Responsibility = 100% Individual Liberty
Voluntary Association + Mutual Cooperation + 110% Personal Responsibility = 100% Individual Liberty
Where?
got a link?
Does your state have a "sore loser" law?
Sheriff Richard Mack
Sheriff Mack has been a consultant on numerous cases regarding police abuse, brutality or other government and police misconduct for attorneys and citizens alike. He lectures on various Constitutional issues, especially gun control and the 2nd Amendment, States' rights, federal intervention, the proper role of law enforcement, and the peace officer's oath of office. He is also an expert at explaining why a Sheriff is the leading law enforcement authority in his county. http://www.umedia.com/Mack/
sounds like
an interesting man
I heard
they Federalized all police but have been unable to link a source.
Anyone heard or know about this?
What you will start seeing is "Regional" on your police cars. I've seen them here in W. PA - anyone else?