0 votes

Extra ENERGY in 9/11 buildings: Tell the Teacher

OpEd News | June 27, 2008

High school teacher-level Physics calculations show Gravity ACTION on 9/11 Towers was 0.1 KiloTons of TNT-equivalent ENERGY, and then
debris and dust erupted over 8.5 KiloTons of ‘TNT’ ENERGY in REACTION.

No spin, FACT:
0.1 KT ACTION not equal 8.5 KT REACTION

Who dunnit?

::::::::

When the top chunk of Mt. St. Helens turned into a cloud of dust, thrown on the landscape, then TV and newspapers said the mountain expended the energy equivalent of 30,000 K Tons of TNT, (a Kilo Ton, or ‘KT,’ is 1000 tons, and TNT is energetic ‘dynamite’ force). I talked with the editor of the local newspaper recently, and he remembered publishing such a number back then.

How did they know that number? Were there conflicting opinions? Did TV and newspapers give ‘equal time’ for disagreement — back then, May 18, 1980, the Fairness Doctrine still regulated broadcasting to air all sides, or arguable points of view, of any debateable issue — was it 40,000 KT of TNT equivalent energy? Or 10,000 KT?

No, that’s just silly talk. Certainly it was 30,000 KT, no argument, no debate. The number is not an ‘opinion,’ it’s a calculation of a fact. Like an Example problem, perhaps in Physics homework. Multiply the massive weight of the rock times how far it flew against gravity’s energy forcing it down to the ground; and so, weight times distance times gravity, is the energy number … presto, the math is done, easy as pie.

The same calculation makes a fact that 8.5 KT of energy force expanded the dust cloud of pulverized concrete which came out of each Twin Tower on 9/11 and spread across Manhattan’s buildings and streets an inch thick, or more.

Eight-point-five Kilo Tons, or 8.5 KT of expended energy, is the number which TV and newspapers do NOT say, because it’s censored, prohibited, since there’s a mystery about where that energy came from. Since zero-point-one Kilo Tons, or 0.1 KT, is all the energy that gravity had, forcing down on each building.

Gravity smacking the floors together, one-by-one flattening them like pancakes, all told, 110 floors pushed down into a stack on ground level, where gravity can’t push any farther — multiplying all the weight that came down the distance to the ground, and the fact is: 0.1 KT of TNT-equivalent energy was expended. That’s all there possibly was. 0.1 KiloTons of TNT-equivalent energy. If a Tower weighed twice as much, there was 0.2 KT of energy in it. If it weighed twice as much being twice as tall, then 0.4 KT of energy was in it, at all times, stored there by the laborious work invested in building it, making it stand about 30 years against gravity pushing it down.

Whether the building is on fire or not, it weighs the same and stands as tall, until gravity — not fire — starts into action.

Same as if you have a book on the table, and you push it off the edge so it drops on a weight scale. When it hits the scale, it scores the same (energy) force of gravity pushing its fall, every time, whether or not the book is on fire. Instead of a book, if you use a balloon full of water, the force measured when it falls down on the scale is the same, every time, whether the water is liquid or solid ice. And, if you know how tall the table is, and you know the weight of the book or water balloon, you can calculate the pounds of force the scale is going to show under the falling object — and have that answer before you push the weight off the table! It’s not an “opinion,” it’s a calculation, in the facts of the matter.

Each 9/11 dust cloud measured 8.5 KT of (energy) force spreading out of the building. But only 0.1 KT of gravity pushed each building, straight down. Such ‘Action-NOT equal-Reaction’ was as if you dropped a 1 Ton book off the table and the scale measured 85 Tons hit it. The mystery of where the extra energy force came from, measured on 9/11, is an unsolved mystery.

The 9/11 Commission did not solve the mystery. Heck, the 9/11 Commission did not even Report the mystery, of 8.5 KT of TNT energy measured in the dust cloud expanding out of each Tower. Gagged silent Commissioners, like TV and newspapers. Was it only 8 KT, or 5 KT, of energy throwing the dust? The 9/11 Commissioners got paid taxpayer money to do the math, to calculate the Physics homework problem. Then they cashed our check and never did the math calculation. That’s public fraud.

Heck, the 9/11 Commission never even reported anything about the third(!) skyscraper, turned into an expanding dust cloud on 9/11, (billowing out of the so-called Building 7 of the World Trade Center), nevermind not calculating the energy spread of Building 7’s fall. The 9/11 Commissioners took our money, that our Congress gave them, and turned in a blank homework assignment. Nor did our missing Congress ever ask to see the missing math, either. TV and newspapers are now censored, and prohibited from telling the unsolved mystery number.

TV and newspapers have the factual calculation of the explosive-equivalent energy number, certainly — the same place they got it from for Mt. St. Helens.

What TV and newspapers don’t have, and what Congress doesn’t have, and what the American taxpayers who paid for it don’t have, is the answer to: What happened on 9/11?

The answer is sure NOT that a plane hit the building, it caught fire, and fell down, just as sure as 1 KT is NOT equal to 85 KT.

The mystery remains unsolved. What happened? And the 9/11 Commissioners committed fraud, which is a crime, cashing the check from Congress but then never producing the goods they were required to deliver on contract.

What happened on 9/11?, when 8.5 KiloTons of (energy) force came out of each Tower where gravity put only 0.1 KiloTons of (energy) force in each heavy tall building … fire or no fire, because gravity makes buildings fall down, fire is innocent, weighs nothing, doesn’t count.. Unless it exploded.

But how could (energetic) explosives get into the three skyscrapers, (particularly Building 7 where FBI and CIA offices were)? Was there a World Trade Center security guard watching? Did building Security keep records? Who owned the building Security Company? Oh, wait, that’s not a mystery, that’s in the public record of the business: Securacom, and its part-owner, on the board of directors is President Bush’s brother, Marvin Bush.

At least, the 9/11 Commissioners can be charged with the crime of contract fraud, and perp-walked into Court, to do the math and answer to a judge. What happened on 9/11? Not crashing airplanes, since the buildings withstood that, (and Building 7 never got hit at all, yet it turned into dust). When we step back from the many non-counting details, shoved in our face for attention — what floor the plane hit, which floor fell first, who went in to rescue people, how strong were the stairs, when did the fires burn out — and mindfully look at the Big Picture from the point of view of a helicopter circling the scene, we calculate ALL of the parts ADDED UP in the whole building shebang, gave gravity force 0.1 KT of push-down energy, and we see gravity did it, and then we see recorded measurement shows that more than 85-times-too-much energy erupted a cloud up, in reaction to gravity’s Big Push action.

Maybe Political Science can calculate how many more times the force of Law was broken erupting out of the 9/11 Commission pushing fraud on Congress. I can’t calculate the political, I can calculate the physical sciences. The fact of the matter is 9/11 physics continues being an unsolved mystery problem.

I asked my friend, the editor, if his newspaper is going to publish the mystery I reported to him. He said ‘the Democrats in Congress’ should have first reported it to be published, before they got their anthrax letters from the CIA’s germ warfare lab, and now he didn’t want his newspaper to get an anthrax letter. So America’s unsolved mystery goes on, unreported, as TV and newspapers are censored from saying.

What happened on 9/11?

[Answers in the back of the book, as usual, are here at this website: TinyURL.com/2p8kep There, the calculation math is done for all to see and check for errors, including 9/11 Commissioners, and Congress, and TV and newspaper people. That website uses KWH units, or Kilo Watt Hours, like your electric bill, to calculate total 9/11 energies. Gravity Action on each Tower was about 140,000 KWH, and then over 10,000,000 KWH of energy erupted in Reaction. Above, my version calculates in terms of Kilo Tons of TNT-equivalent energy, which uses this translation:
1 KWH = 3.6 Mega Joules, (3,600,000 J.),
1000 KWH = 3.6 Giga Joules, (3,600,000,000 J.)
1 Ton TNT force = 4.185 GigaJoules, (4,185,000,000 J.),
and those two (1000 KWH and 1 Ton TNT) multiplied times 1000 to get to Kilo Tons leads to
1,000,000 KWH = 3600 GigaJ.
1000 Ton TNT = 1 KT = 4185 GigaJ.

So thereby, I took each 1,000,000 KWH in the website calculations, as 6/7 (six sevenths, as 3600 / 4200 GJ) of 1 KT of energy; which results in 10,000,000 KWH = 8.5 KT and 140,000 KWH = 0.120 KT ... and I rounded 0.12 KT down to 0.1 KT, but you can round it up to 0.2 KT, if you prefer, or even 0.5 KT and still have ten times more dust cloud mystery above what energy gravity could possibly put in it.
As far as that goes, the 8.5 KT of energy reaction, (10,000,000 KWH) from each Tower, uses rounded-down measurements, for conservative estimation -- explained at the website: TinyURL.com/2p8kep -- so 8.5 KT is the least of it, and actual 9/11 energy released could possibly be ten times greater, 85 KT of TNT equivalent, or more.

Furthermore, the value cited for Mt. St. Helens being a "30,000 KT" eruption, is the number I recall and I did not look it up in old newspapers. TV and newspapers in 1980, definitely did issue some number, but in the use of it here only to make the point that a calculation CAN number the quantity of energy in a dust cloud, the firgured Mt. St. Helens number is arbitrary. However, my recall usually is accurate in such details, should anyone care to check to verify.]

So no one knows. An unsolved mystery. The airplanes did NOT do it.. Who dunnit? What happened on 9/11?

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7924

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm a truther and not trying

I'm a truther and not trying to pick a fight but there are some problems with the article you linked to. The major problem is that the 30,000 K tons of force was an estimate, not a fact. The same holds for the 8.5 K tons from each of the twin towers. There is no way to gather the data in order to positively know the forces in a blast that large. To know with certainly you would need to know about every crack in the mountain, find every rock, pebble and grain of dust that blew off, the distance each traveled and a number of other things. The same holds true for the twin towers. When a figure regarding the total energy in the blast is given it is an estimate, not a fact.

The basic idea of what you are saying, that there was more energy observed than can be accounted for through gravity and the chemical energy in the jet fuel, is correct. The problem is that the author of the article needlessly overstates the case by demanding that the estimates be considered as facts. This makes us look bad. Estimates could range from 2 K ton to 20 k ton and it wouldn't change the point the author is trying to make, that the observed energy is greater than the theoretical energy without explosives.

There are a number of ways to prove that the official story violates the laws of physics. This one works but it depends on estimates, making it weaker than some other arguments. If you want an argument which is similar to this one, yet not dependent on estimates, I suggest this paper from Steven Jones et all:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf

"Freedom suppressed and again regained bites with keener fangs than freedom never endangered." -- Cicero

I have simply put the article forward for review.

I have not made any other statements than,concrete does not turn into dust and pyroclastic clouds by structural failure.
I have met Dr. Jones and seen his presentation,thanks for the info though.

*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008

*********************************************
The Second Amendment
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security

The DP

The DP had truther controversies in the earlier days of the DP and there was a structural engineer here who said it was perfectly plausible.

No little formula stuck up there means anything to anyone who is not an engineer and even then, how often do huge buildings fall down so you can say 'it happens like this', or 'it happens like that'? Thankfully, not very often.

So it's just one guy says this, one guy says the opposite. Nothing is settled.

"What does conservatism today stand for? It stands for war. It stands for power. It stands for spying, jailing without trial, torture, counterfeiting without limit, and lying from morning to night."

Lew Rockwell

No one questions the amount of force reported in

a volcanic eruption because it doesn't matter. No one is making accusations that it wasn't actually an eruption but rather an explosion created by the government to cover up their secret work. Calculating energy by looking at dust clouds is hardly an exact science, what can be calculated is the force produced but one cannot easily calculate the energy expended. They can guess the amount of force in a volcanic explosion because they have a good idea of how much mass they are dealing with, they don't guess it by looking at the dust cloud. You are also arguing that there was 85 times the force applied by explosives than there was by the force of the collapsing of the towers. Why would this be? It takes a pretty small amount of explosive to cause an controlled collapse and it would take a huge amount of explosives to produce the force you are suggesting.

Free and Brave
or Cradle to Grave
You can't have both

Free and Brave
or Cradle to Grave
You can't have both

Concrete does not pulverize into dust in structural collapse..

It breaks in chunks. Gravity does not eject steel beams 600 ft. outward,and stick them into other structures.

*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008

*********************************************
The Second Amendment
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security

OH NOOOO!!!!

Sheer Scientific Reason Overcomes Terrorism. Who again on this site said that a collapse using gravity alone as the energy source alone could have caused that much energy release and subsequent implosion at freefall speed of a steel framed building?????

I can take a stab at a few names.

The war on your mind -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klSek88t54w
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
If we can't vote for Dr. Paul consider a vote for Constitutional Freedom, consider Chuck Baldwin -- http://baldwin2008.com

Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/

Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/

War on Gravity

We clearly do not have a war on terror, we have a war on gravity. Force does not equal force and the laws of nature are no longer laws. It is the only explanation that will jive with the official theory. Official Theory: No Common Sense Allowed. (Thanks for the great article.)

.

THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost

THE MORE I LEARN ABOUT GOVERNMENT
THE MORE I LOVE MY GUNS
FourWindsTradingPost

?

*****************
"My role in the revolution is to wake up the lemmings of this country, who sit back and accept the pablum the media feeds them"
Jesse Ventura
Ventura/Paul 2008

*********************************************
The Second Amendment
The ORIGINAL Homeland Security