IOUSA - What's the story?

0 votes

First: The IOUSA Trailer
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HBo2xQIWHiM
Second: The Creator of the film
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XoHh2CslpGo
Third: Where is this coming from?
http://youtube.com/watch?v=vFzKZ2_8tiw
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSi41...
Forth: What is..."I am voting for..."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=X2oy1PdK7j0
Fifth: What is... "takepart/Chicago10?"
http://www.takepart.com/chicago10/
Sixth: Is there a direct connection from IOUSA to takepart/Chicago10? And if so...?????

IDK about all this to be honest it makes me a little uncomfortable. You're a smart group so lets get this thing dissected.

(I have to goto work tonight and cannot investigate this myself till later. But that's no reason to not make progress. I give this to you, please do some digging.)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sorry but this has more back

Sorry but this has more back story info than other threads on this topic.

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

mr. peterson will be CFR to me

until he gives his entire fotune to the movement like I have. Everyone else should be leary of this whole thing unless someone comes forward to award their entire fortune to the cause. I feel this movie will be used to act as if they care about the cause to take the spotlight off any one group (us)
Remember these paeople lie tlike they breath air. Its part of the rules for them. Do anything it takes to achieve power. Don't be fooled by this.

The CFR didn't make this

The CFR didn't make this movie but they did buy it. So I wouldn't not watch the movie for this reason. It will likely be good for waking people up in general but it is how it is use afterward which draws concern.

Chance favors the prepared mind and must play the hand we're dealt.

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Maybe the idea is to start riots this September. Did you see

this: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSi41...
Blackstone's Peterson Backs Film on U.S. Debt Through Nonprofit
'...As he stood a few feet from a portrait of himself at the Council of Foreign Relations in Manhattan -- he's a former chairman -- Peterson, 82, addressed an elite crowd of 150 that included philanthropists David Rockefeller and Donald B. Marron; former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger; former New York Governor Mario Cuomo; Quadrangle Group LLC co-founder Steven Rattner and Robert Rubin, the former U.S. treasury secretary.
Peterson told the crowd that the Peter G. Peterson Foundation has bought the rights to the feature-length documentary, ``I.O.U.S.A.,'' which will open..."

Mathew 5:9 Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.

Added link.

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Yeah well... I don't like it

Sure it's great to bring up the national debt.

I see this as a massive effort for misdirection. Who I wonder does this movie point the finger at? The Bush Administration? The Mortgage Companies? The American people?

He said we need to pay off the debt for the sake of our children. That is a morally irresponsible statement - anyone who studies the national debt comes to understand the private Federal Reserve System. A system of borrowing debt, at interest, which compounds debt and leads to a never ending cycle that always ends in collapes. We and our children can never pay it back.

The whole banking system is a scam, they make bad loans, get real property assests (land/homes/businesses), the government borrows to bail them out and the national debt skyrockets. Ooops I mean, the bank and International interests get to buy up the land and resources for pennies when they drive us to economic failure. Which, is why Congress & Co. is not bothered by the unsound spending - everybody wins except the poor and middle class.

Right, could this be used as

Right, could this be used as an excuse to justify the Amero? Is my concern considering who's involved.

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

I don't know either, but...

it seems that exposing our exorbitant national debt can't be a bad thing. I also argue that if it is well received it is going to help serve our movement because fiscal responsibility is one of our strongest core tenets...that's my take for what it's worth...

This could be one colossal

This could be one colossal co opt action. It's not something we can stop nor will we be able to tell what the results are prior to the release. Just be weary and have a watchful eye.

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Let me put it

this way. Would you except candy from the devil even if it was gift wrapped?
Peace

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

How would you recognize the

How would you recognize the devil?

CommissiononPresidentialDebates
NationalBallotAccess
NOTA
BlackBoxVoting

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

lol

Good point.