Ron Paul says Chuck Baldwin is very very close to his views and Chuck worked hard on Ron's Presidential campiagn

0 votes

Ron Paul has stated that Chuck Baldwin is very, very close to his views and that Chuck Baldwin worked very hard on Ron Paul's campaign for President.

Many of us supported Ron Paul through thick and thin. We never became discouraged as we witnessed the media bias. It actually made us fight even harder to promote the message of freedom and liberty and the rule of law based on our Constitution. Of course, many of us continue to fight on to retain a Government that actually works for the people.

But every great strategy needs a backup plan.

If Ron Paul does not win the nomination in September at the RNC Convention in MN, we need to be prepared. We need to have a candidate who is well funded and who is ready for the big game. Who is that person? None other than Ron Paul's friend of many years, Chuck Baldwin, the presidential nominee for the Constitution Party.

June 23 2008 " Jesse Benton, a spokesman for Ron Paul, said that his boss does not plan to recommend supporters to champion Barr. "Bob and Ron are former colleagues and they're friends. But that's where the relationship ends."

Yes, here we go again. The main stream media seems to be pretending to acknowledge Bob Barr as the 3rd party worth noting and Chuck Baldwin is experiencing a COMPLETE MSM blackout just like Ron Paul did. Why? Probably because he isn't afraid to call them out! If the MSM likes Bob Barr, WE DON'T!

We are asking all of you to continue to help us and support the freedom message with the people that actually mean what they say and practice what the preach.

We are holding a fundraiser for Chuck Baldwin August 17th, 2008. On August 17th, 1990, George H.W. Bush claimed that Iraq was in the way of the New World Order.

We are asking all of you to please visit

http://www.NoNewWorldOrder.com and pledge to donate to Chuck Baldwin's campaign so that you can help Chuck promote Ron Paul's message. Chuck Baldwin has been doing just that by working within Ron Paul's campaign, and now he will do it again on a national scale through his campaign for President as the nominee of the Constitution Party.

Ron Paul supports Chuck Baldwin as stated on CNN and other Main Stream Media outlets across the country and we support him as well. Now we need all of you to get behind him with us. No donation is too small.

Ron Paul has said that revolutions are long term projects and we will continue to honor him by spreading his message world wide until we bring America back to what is once was, A Constitutional Republic.

Please help us to continue to move forward and make the changes that need to be made in this country: http://www.NoWewWorldOrder.com.

Be sure to tune in for live coverage of the Money Bomb event all day long on August 17th, 2008 on http://www.RevolutionBroadcasting.com.

Thank you all!

Dr. Steve Parent

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I made up my mind to vote for Chuck Baldwin if Ron Paul isn't

available.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." Benjamin Franklin
---

government of the people, by the people, for the people
---

Baldwin is a hardline social

Baldwin is a hardline social conservative. Paul holds personal views that are conservative, but his politics are libertarian -- Baldwins are NOT.

Here's an oversimplified outline showing what the major parties have traditionally claimed to represent (don't respond to tell me that they don't represent their own ideals; we all understand that; pay attention to what I'm actually writing):

--Republican Party: socially conservative, economically right-wing.

--Democratic Party: socially liberal, economically left-wing.

Then there's the three largest third parties:

--Constitution Party: socially conservative, economically right-wing.

--Green Party: socially liberal, economically left-wing.

--Libertarian Party: socially liberal, economically right-wing.

The first thing you should notice is that the LP is the oddball of the bunch. The others are not bucking any trends.

The CP is basically a hardcore version of what the RP claims to be. There's nothing original or dangerous there, as far as the GOP establishment is concerned.

The GP is basically a hardcore version of what the DP claims to be. There's nothing original or dangerous there, as far as the DNC establishment is concerned.

The LP is different: they occupy a unique position that threatens both major parties simultaneously. They remind people that politics has two dimensions, not one. The major parties don't want people to be reminded of that. So the GOP establishment marginalizes the LP by calling them socially decadent, and the DNC establishment marginalizes the LP by calling them economically heartless. What should be clear to all of us is that the LP represents the anti-establishment position, at least as far as parties with a statistical chance of winning go. There may be better representatives of that position, but they are not worth discussing, due to the realities of ballot access.

The LP is where we belong, not the CP, and certainly not the GP.

----------
Liberty for Dummies

I was wrong about you guys bashing Barr

imo - except when you descend to abuse and rumors.

This is what we should be doing - holding their feet to the fire and making them *prove* beyond doubt they are worthwhile - as regards Barr anyway.

And with Baldwin - he and the CP have to have to have to wake up to the fact that they will be a permanent 1% party if they don't go libertarian on social issues.

The only future is with young people - most of them are NOT prolife. Because Dr. Paul is so hardcore on drugs and so consistent and he explained it was states rights, they let that one slide - ONLY JUST let it slide.

The CP is a dead end, a tiny insignificant party that will actually prevent any real change by sucking up the votes of people who would otherwise vote for a serious Constitutional libertarian.

STOP TALKING ABOUT THE BIBLE PLEASE CHUCK BALDWIN AND THE CP!!!!!! If they do that, the sky is the limit. Because they are imo less silly than the Libertarian party. I prefer them but I would like to get behind a party and a man who is going to get more than .5% of the vote frankly.

"What does conservatism today stand for? It stands for war. It stands for power. It stands for spying, jailing without trial, torture, counterfeiting without limit, and lying from morning to night."

Lew Rockwell

I knew the Barr trolls would

I knew the Barr trolls would not be happy with this thread.... Sigh! Anyway, if I had the money I would support Baldwin as he is the best choice after RP.... I will NEVER support Barr... did you hear that?! NEVER!!! And any sane RP supporter wouldn't either! He's not even second best! Chuck obviously is.... and that's that! Stop the pestering already!!

NONE BUT PAUL!

Chuck sucks

He spams my email address from his youtube. I keep reporting him and he keeps spamming me.

I do not like any preacher turned president. Preaching is a more important job in my opinion and if baldwin is any good at it he should stick with it.

Steve Parent on the other hand is a nutjob Manson Fan.

The Revolution Continues at http://nationbuilder.org

Manson?

As in Marilyn Manson?

I love Marilyn Manson...

No he is talkjing about

No he is talkjing about someone named Steve Parent was killed by Charles Manson but I actually do like some MM songs.

www.nonewworldorder.com

www.whokilledtheconstitution.com

www.revolutionbroadcasting.com

www.constitutionrevolution.com

Dr. Steve Parent

Heh...

Nope, not Laurie...I'm actually asking an honest question, because I really like MM, and I guess I have no idea what that person was saying about "nutjob Manson fan"...that's the only thing I can think of that makes sense to me...

Baldwin is going no where.

Baldwin is going no where. His stance on Social issues are so far from Rons it is laughable. Barr was supporting Ron the whole time. Ron Paul was a once in a lifetime candidate, now we must support the one candidate who has a chance to continue the message.

Bob Barr is having a distinct impact, though how long that will hold in a tight race is anybody’s guess. Right now, if you believe Zogby, Barr is pulling at least 5% (and sometimes 7-9/10%) in 22 states! Nationally he’s only showing at 3%, but for him to be having this sort of impact in nearly half the states is pretty damn amazing.

Please DSP, get off of your high horse, because you lost my trust months ago.

NOT TRUE!

He's going to heaven.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

Ho ho ho. I can say one

Ho ho ho.

I can say one thing: Baldwin never voted for the PATRIOT ACT.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Kevin don't bother with this

Kevin don't bother with this person they are a firm Barr supporter. Nothing of reason you say will matter. Voting for the patriot act was a good thing according to this person.

www.nonewworldorder.com

www.whokilledtheconstitution.com

www.revolutionbroadcasting.com

www.constitutionrevolution.com

Dr. Steve Parent

He never had the chance.

Barr didn't vote for the Patriot Act until it was agreed that the sunset clause could be put in. That was the condition. Nothing wrong with that. What's he supposed to do, not agree to vote yes, with the result being no sunset clause put in so he can stand back and say "Look at me. I'm a Constitutionalist! Is everyone impressed?"?? What good is that? Nothing. Nothing would have been accomplished. Nothing impresses me more than someone willing to get their hands dirty, and willing go to hell for it, to help liberate us from the state.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

'Nothing wrong with that'

'Nothing wrong with that' only if you have zero respect for the Oath of Office. The USA Patriot Act was and is clear and willful attack on the Bill of Rights, and particularly, the Fourth Amendment.

If America survives, the Patriot Act will eventually be completely struck down by the Judicial Branch as the act of treason it represents.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

Only if we have enough justices who ...

Support the Constitution, I'm becoming more inclined to suspect they will be as Constitutionally ignorant as the next President. (now if we get Ron Paul, then they will be as brilliant as he is, most likely)

Libera me, let the truth break, what my fears make--Leslie Phillips

But that man should play the tyrant over God, and find Him a better man than himself, is astonishing drama indeed!~~D. Sayers

There is no difference between an authoritarian government from the right or the left...F. A.Schaeffer

He did the Constitutional thing.

It's also Constitutionalist to do what is necessary to eliminate unconstitutional legislation, even if that includes voting for it in exchange for a deal to sunset it. That's totally in line with Constitutionalism.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

Orwellian nonsense.

Barr will never be elected President, or be in those debates, because of that expedient decision. He should have voted 'no' like Ron Paul did.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

No, that would have done more damage to the Constitution.

If he has the ability to vote yes in in order for the legislation to expire in a few years, then that's the thing any rational Constitutionalist would do. You do what is necessary to eliminate unconstitutional laws.

You're wrong to think that his vote was a vote in favor of the Patriot Act, that is, because he liked the Patriot Act. That wasn't it at all. It was a vote against it, because the only purpose the vote served was to put the sunset clause in it. He made it clear in his testimony before it went to vote how much he was against it.

If anyone doesn't recognize that that's the Constitutionalist thing to do, they're just not very bright, not capable of anything but the most rudimentary brutish reasoning.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

What kind of Doctor are you?

SGP, what exactly are you a doctor of? Let me take a wild guess that you will not respond...

Where Is Your Nemesis Laurie To Put You In Your Place????

on this thread you resigned from revolution broadcasting:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/56789

So now is this what you are going to be doing with your free time?
Give it a break until after the damned convention mr ron paul supporter.

I would abstain from voting or write in Ron Paul before I would ever vote for some fundamentalist jackass that WOULD try to take away my personal
liberty's and freedoms.I'll never vote for anyone that wears their religion on their sleeve.Ever.

Paper Ballots,Hand Counted At The Precinct Or Bust

thanks steve

for not leaving me to twist in the wind.Whether we can pull it of at the convention the r3VOLution must carry on.God be with our delegates who are so bravely have volunteered to man the FRONT lines for us.Lates support them with whatever donations we can.

Baldwin is going no where.

Baldwin is going no where. His stance on Social issues are so far from Rons it is laughable. Barr was supporting Ron the whole time. Ron Paul was a once in a lifetime candidate, now we must support the one candidate who has a chance to continue the message.

Bob Barr is having a distinct impact, though how long that will hold in a tight race is anybody’s guess. Right now, if you believe Zogby, Barr is pulling at least 5% (and sometimes 7-9/10%) in 22 states! Nationally he’s only showing at 3%, but for him to be having this sort of impact in nearly half the states is pretty damn amazing.

Please DSP, get off of your high horse, because you lost my trust months ago.

Maybe after the GOP

Maybe after the GOP convention RP will either be the nominee or he will endorse another candidate. Personally, I want to know who RP endorses prior to putting much behind any other candidate.

...

I have said this many times

I have said this many times before that Ron Paul can't endorse someone running against a Republican or he could get knocked down to a junior member in congress. But if you goto www.nonewworldorder.com you will see and hear Ron Paul say how Chuck Baldwins views are very very close to mine and he will also say how Chuck Baldwin worked very hard on Ron paul's Presidential campaign.

www.nonewworldorder.com

www.whokilledtheconstitution.com

www.revolutionbroadcasting.com

www.constitutionrevolution.com

Dr. Steve Parent

Your conspiracy theory.

This is where you go wrong:

"The main stream media seems to be pretending to acknowledge Bob Barr as the 3rd party worth noting and Chuck Baldwin is experiencing a COMPLETE MSM blackout just like Ron Paul did. Why? Probably because he isn't afraid to call them out! If the MSM likes Bob Barr, WE DON'T!"

Either you're stupid, or you're trying to take advantage of conspiracy-minded people. You're insulting the intelligence of rational people. The reason the media doens't report on Baldwin is because he is not polling high enough to be significant. Paul is interviewed on the news way more than Baldwin. Paul gets more interviews than Barr. Does that mean Baldwin is viewed as more dangerous to the establishment that Paul? Does that mean Barr is viewed as more dangerous to the establishment than Paul? How can anyone be so ridiculous?

Raise some money for him, advertise, and get his polling up. What happens if the MSM starts featuring him? Then are you going to drop your support because the MSM likes him? Don't be so stupid.

************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.

Just like I thought you are

Just like I thought you are part of the Bob Barr clan well we are not buying it.

This is daily paul and we support people that Ron Paul agrees with not the other way around.

Bob Barr is not even close to Ron Paul and all of us here know it.

When Ron Paul states that Bob Barr is very very close to his views I will start listening but until then BOB BARR DOESN'T GET ANY ATTENTION FROM ME!

www.nonewworldorder.com

www.whokilledtheconstitution.com

www.revolutionbroadcasting.com

www.constitutionrevolution.com

Dr. Steve Parent

SGP! Interview with Glenn Beck RP says---

On part two at 7:48 Glenn asks "who will you vote for?"
RP responds " Well, we don't even know who will be on the ballot yet"

Soooo...who is NOT on the ballots yet? I think this was very telling...if not obvious to some already...that Baldwin is the one he is waiting for!
I am not sure about the Party yet...but I really have a trust in the man! Baldwin is closer to RP I think than Barr.

I'm tired of pussy-footing around the trolls here!

I am for RP all the way and I will hold out and decide after September... but if it has to be ...my instinct and trust would go to Baldwin!

PS Thank you for your fortitude and positive input and determination.

"I think we are living in a world of lies: lies that don't even know they are lies, because they are the children and grandchildren of lies." ~ Chris Floyd