I really dont know how to feel about this.
Submitted by erkyng2003 on Fri, 08/01/2008 - 21:27
Within a week or two of the attack, people would start dying, Graham says.
http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/iran_nuclear_plan/2008/07/2...
»





















And they call us conspiracy freaks.
This article is pretty far out there. I've been called a conspiracy nut for far less. Analogy: Joe Blow bought some ammo and test fired it, so he must be planning to kill Chuck. We can't think of any other reason why he would buy ammo (although he is a hunter) so he must be planning to kill someone and that person must be Chuck because he doesn't like him.
Exactly. Iran is the one that is scared and for good reason.
Iran is more scared than anyone else, that's why they launched their little short range missiles - just to say, see we have muskets, don't attack us.
But they are terrified that Israel, with several hundred nukes, a far superior military, and with backing from the US is going to steamroll over them like we did in Iraq.
These reports coming out that Iran is a threat to the U.S. are rubbish. It's the same kind of propaganda that began filtering into the news before we invaded all the other countries in undeclared wars of the past half century.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Speculation
If anyone were to nuke the US, it would probably be Israel in a false flag attack, that would absolutely require the US to go to war with Iran. Israel actually has nukes too, which is an important ingredient for nuking.
The CIA recently warned Israel not to stage another false flag attack on the US, they wouldn't have done so unless there were serious concerns.
That doesn't mean it would be nuclear though.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Well, this
may happen but the nuke is likely the one that is missing from our own shores. The author seems like a propaganda agent after looking at his archives stories. Peace
Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.
Utter BS
pure propaganda