Tucker Carlson: Video of World Trade Center 7 Collapsing
Video: World Trade Center Building 7 - The Evidence
In the video:
Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones
The professor's website: http://journalof911studies.com
I would like to hear Tucker Carlson's side of this. What was preventing him from showing the video clip, was he told not to? He really seemed adamant about not showing the very clip the professor wanted to discuss.
Should I be embarrassed to say that because of this video I am beginning to think 9/11 was a false flag attack? Or should I be embarrassed that I had not been convinced of a possible cover up before?
Less than a day ago I was still holding on to the belief that there were viable explanations disproving what conspiracy theorists were saying. My impression was that they were reading more into things than they should, and there were generally some explanations that could be argued.
However, this news report with Tucker Carlson on it seems to have shed some light on the situation for me:
I don't think there is any doubt now, it's only a matter of what actually happened. This building definitely did not fall perfectly onto itself, all supports completely damaged at exactly the same time, due to random damage from fire or debris.
Especially seeing the photo that shows buildings 5 and 6 right next to the towers, did not collapse, but 7 further away did:
http://www.ae911truth.org/wtc7.php
And this site seems highly credible: http://stj911.com
Wherein, Physics Professor Steven E. Jones, states, "I would like to emphasize at the outset that Reynolds and Wood and I agree on the fundamental matter that the WTC Towers and WTC 7 were brought down by controlled demolition rather than by damage + fires."
http://stj911.com/jones/Jones_Replyto_Reynolds_Wood.html
This is one I didn't want to believe, but thinking back about how I was tricked by the media about Ron Paul, and I only found out the truth when I took the time to do some reading on my own, this is clearly shaping up to be another massive lie.
Yet, this one is dangerous, because merely talking about it will not just get you labeled as a nut, people will actually think you are insane.
In closing, something to chew on; declassified Top Secret Operation Northwoods documents, where the Joint Chiefs of Staff were actually planning false flag terrorist attacks against America to justify an invasion of Cuba. (hosted at George Washington University)
-
Most recently I read this, which is very convincing, anyone interested in facts and science should read this, it discusses how fire could not get hot enough to melt the steel, that explosive residue was never tested for, and the NIST, after their complete investigation, is quoted as saying;
"…we are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse” - NIST 9/2007
The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Volume 2 Issue 1
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction pp.35-40
April 8, 2008
Authors: Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00...
Here's your chance, "debunkers"!
If anyone can answer the fourteen (14) queries in search of 9/11 Truth listed on this thread, citing ONLY "mainstream" media sources to support their arguments, then I am willing to contribute two hundred dollars ($200.00) to Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty or to the Presidential candidate of your choice (excepting any of the other candidates for the Democrat or NeoCon Party).
Put my money where your mouth is!
----
The Antidote to neoCon Koolaid: www.dvds4delegates.com
"We really do have...a once in a lifetime opportunity to take the Republican Party back to where it was." -Kent Snyder, 1959-2008
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
Not embarrassed, just shocked. Welcome to the truth.
"Or should I be embarrassed that I had not been convinced of a possible cover up before?"
why embarrassed it's true!
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
When freedom is at stake, silence is not golden – it is yellow- Tom Anderson writer patriot. 1910-2001
"Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
Spam
False Headline and Its so embarrassing to have this stuff connected with Ron Paul Too bad there is no moderator on this site or it would be flagged and deleted.
Go back to sleep....
The government is your friend and will help you out during the next false flag event that will lead to even less personal liberty. All in the name of keeping you safe.....ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
people like you
Michael Nystrom does monitor and moderate this website when he deems appropriate.
What's embarrassing is having to explain to people like you that private individuals can provide other private individuals with forums for free speech like this that are available to the public.
----
The Antidote to neoCon Koolaid: www.dvds4delegates.com
"We really do have...a once in a lifetime opportunity to take the Republican Party back to where it was." -Kent Snyder, 1959-2008
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
Embarrassed? No way!
You should feel proud of yourself. Up until a year ago, I too wanted to believe in the government's official explanation of 9/11. HA! My daughter's boyfriend begged me and nagged me to watch TerrorStorm. When I finally gave in, I actually had to stop it halfway through because I was crying so hard. Such a sad and shocking realization. Nauseating. The red pill is so very bitter. But I'd rather be wide awake than half asleep. Welcome to the club.
Terrorstorm
I'm watching Terrorstorm now. It's very shocking, expecially having the Opteration Northwoods documents in hand - if I didn't, I would be much more likely to not believe it.
TerrorStorm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947
Top Secret Operation Northwoods document
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
In the Government We Trust
I was embarrassed that people have been literally screaming about 9/11 ever since it happened, and I have been ignoring them for years.
There seems to be a horrible American tendecy to trust the government and media by default.
I guess once you find your way to a beacon of truth, somewhere like Daily Paul, it's only a matter of time before you give in and start listening to things you've always discounted as preposterous.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
One Of The Greatest
Beauties of life is: using your "completely independent mentality" to do your own investigatin'!
Beautiful!
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Gonna raise me an army, some tough sons of bitches
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5uKHa9Gmks
Take the next step
Ever wonder why the media doesn't do any investigative work into 911??
Ever wonder why the media doesn't support the most honest candidate in our lifetime????
The proof that they, and the government are behind 911 is contained in the videos on "September Clues" on google video.
I am gross and perverted, I'm obsessed and deranged, I have existed for years but very little has changed, I'm the tool of the government and industry too. Have you guessed me yet??
I'm the slime oozing out from your TV set.
Congratulations.
Your eyes are opening, the rabbit hole however goes deeper. Excellent post btw, you pulled Treg, Rhino, and Quotes out to spread disinfo.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
There is a singular Truth to discernible reality
Uncontrolled hydro-carbon fires could not have caused observed ground temperatures of 1100+ degrees Fahrenheit at the site of Ground Zero five days later on 9/16/2001, according to a NASA/ U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) thermal imaging/spectrometer on that date, including at the site of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 which was not struck by an aircraft, thus not exposed to burning jet fuel.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/thermal.r09.html
Human bone fragments measuring as small as a quarter inch and structural steel members weighing thousands of pounds were ejected some 500+ feet laterally during the collapse of the Twin Towers. Gravitational potential energy cannot account this release of energy.
1,151 of the peaceful and innocent victims of 9/11 were apparently completely vaporized, leaving no forensically identifiable trace or artifact whatsoever to recover from Ground Zero. Leaving nothing to lay to rest for the families of the victims of this horrific crime.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/nyregion/06remains.html?_r...
----
The Antidote to neoCon Koolaid: www.dvds4delegates.com
"We really do have...a once in a lifetime opportunity to take the Republican Party back to where it was." -Kent Snyder, 1959-2008
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
That USGS Airborne
That USGS Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer data seems highly convincing that these buildings did not come down due to fire.
Was this in any of the government reports?
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Was this in any of the government reports?
Well, I don't know about NIST (would have to do some research to find out), but I can say that the 9/11 Commission Report does not consider this evidence whatsoever (especially since the collapse of WTC7 was completely omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report, despite being chartered to "prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks").
And I can say that the NTSB investigations did not include this evidence--since no NTSB investigations into the alleged crashes of 4 jet airliners on 9/11 were conducted, despite the fact that NTSB investigations were standard protocol for ALL aircraft crashes until that day.
----
The Antidote to neoCon Koolaid: www.dvds4delegates.com
"We really do have...a once in a lifetime opportunity to take the Republican Party back to where it was." -Kent Snyder, 1959-2008
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
USGS Data is Not in the NIST or 9/11 Commission Reports
Doing a search for "USGS" or "AVIRIS" in both the 298 page NIST and 585 page 9/11 Commission Reports here:
http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1CollapseofTowers.pdf
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/fullreport.pdf
Returns 0 results.
So was the USGS high temperature data ignored or omitted?
Either way it's negligence. NIST was paid $16 million to investigate!
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. in Physics
Once again it looks like you can count on Steven E. Jones, Ph.D. in physics:
Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
Steven E. Jones 1, Jeffrey Farrer 2, Gregory S. Jenkins 3, Frank Legge 4, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe 5
1 S&J Scientific Co., Provo, Utah
2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
3 Physics Department, University of Maryland at College Park, Maryland
4 Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
5 Department of Physics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf
These guys are really on this.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
I need a good laugh...
Just once I'd like to see someone try to "debunk" the questions that I have raised above.
Most telling is that any attempt to "debunk" will not come by the way of "mainstream" media sources. In other words the "mainstream" media is not willing to ask the questions (just like the rest of the propaganda matrix, the debate is framed in such a way as to never question the underlying presuppositions of our system, for example the Fed or American Imperialism). It's nearly a complete blackout of the truth about the events of 9/11.
----
The Antidote to neoCon Koolaid: www.dvds4delegates.com
"We really do have...a once in a lifetime opportunity to take the Republican Party back to where it was." -Kent Snyder, 1959-2008
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
Oh, but they have that
Oh, but they have that damning Popular Mechanics article on their side. How can we stand against that?
(snicker)
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
Nothing more than journalists
I looked at the Popular Mechanics article and what I saw was that it was put out by nothing more than journalists.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
great points
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kgzfu_b6v44
http://www.dvds4delegates.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57925480@N00/2660779139/sizes/l/
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul
Just want to point out
all we can say for sure is that the official story holds no water. We can't say it was an inside job for sure, though I have to admit I suspect more and more that it may well have been.
We Probably Have Not Been Told the Whole Truth
Yes, I agree, I don't think the government would actually plan the attacks, but since the CIA knew about pilots learning to fly planes but not land them, it seems likely they could have known about the threat and just not done anything, allowing it to happen so the government could justify invading the middle east.
We were told that nobody knew about Pearl Harbor ahead of time and that has proven to be false.
And, we have the Northwoods Operation documents that prove the government planned terrorist attacks against the US to justify the invasion of Cuba.
So, knowing those two things, it's not hard to imagine the government knowing about 9/11 attacks and allowing them to happen in order to justify an invasion.
I wonder if tall buildings are secretly rigged with demolition explosives that can be set off for emergency situations, so that they can be demolished instead toppling over onto other buildings and causing a dominio effect of even more damage?
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
What does Tucker Carlson have to do with this?
The post seems like the incoherent rant of a madman.
************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.
************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.
Sounds quite coherent to anyone with an IQ above 90
Why doyou need to be here quotes? You just come here to be a dick all the time so what sort of a kick do you get out of this ? You're voting for mccain aren't you ?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
Don't reply to this quotes guy he's not worth your time.
Don't reply to this quotes guy he's not worth your time.
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
that will be the last morsel of food for that troll.
:)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
Well?
Why are you bringing up Tucker Carlson?
************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.
************************************************
Trolling in the defense of liberty is no vice.
Some Interesting Quotes from NIST report
"In 1945, a B-25 aircraft had become lost in the fog and struck the 78th and 79th floors of the Empire State Building. The building withstood the impact and ensuing fire and was ready for re occupancy the following week."
"An additional load, stated by The Port Authority to have been considered in the design of the towers, was the impact of a Boeing 707, the largest commercial airliner when the towers were designed, hitting the building at its full speed of 600 mph."
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
The evidence all points to explosives...
Great post the 707 is somewhat lighter than the AA planes but moved at a greater speed thus had a larger amount of kinetic energy. The World Trade center could in fact absorb the energy of the airliners.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.