5 votes

The Virtual Conspiracy *Update*

The Virtual Conspiracy

“Is there a Conspiracy?” That is the question that plagues so many intelligent, concerned people today. As we see our once proud nation brought to its knees economically, as we see our soldiers being butchered at the hands of phantom enemies, as we see our liberties being eroded daily, as we stand by helplessly watching our elected leaders betray our interests; it seems a question that is inescapable.
“Is there a Conspiracy?”

The question may take different forms and certainly has many objects of interest. It may be asked regarding international banking, the events of 9/11, mainstream media bias, global-warming, assassination, electric cars, and on and on Ad infinitum. But throughout all of these controversies and mysteries what remains consistent is the fact that the problems which prompted the question in the first place get placed on the back burner, sometimes indefinitely.

Well-intentioned people stop looking for solutions to problems and start looking instead for people to blame. If they detect the scent of a conspiracy, they become obsessed with identifying the conspirators and then uncovering evidence to convince others of their theories. “The truth is out there” becomes the siren song leading them down bewildering paths of confusion and obfuscation. One can hardly blame them. Popular culture, novels and movies all encourage us to believe that if we can only find that one elusive clue, that crucial piece of the puzzle, the “smoking gun”; then and only then will Truth and Justice prevail. In our zeal we even turn on one another; competing and debating in the hope that we will be able to batter the world, and each other, into agreeing with our theories.

As a recovering paranoid I would like to share the wisdom I have attained concerning the nature of conspiracy in the hope of allowing at least some of you to avoid “hitting bottom”. Brothers and sisters, I am here to set you free! I will explain how there can be a secret global conspiracy, bent on world domination, that is totally invisible and, in a conventional sense, impregnable. But I will also tell you how we can fight it and eventually regain our freedom!

The answer to the question, “Is there a conspiracy?” is a resounding, “Yes!” There, wasn’t that easy? And now you may go on with your life. What, you say, that isn’t good enough? You need to know who is behind the shadow empire? You need to expose their corrupt cabal for what it is? You need to know what they knew and when they knew it? You need to bring the guilty parties to justice?

Actually what you need is to read “The Illuminatus! Trilogy” by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson. This circa 1970 masterpiece of psychedelic, satirical fiction ties scores of conspiracies (from “who killed Kennedy” to the “23 synchronicity principle”) into a grand tapestry of drugs, sex, historical fact, myth, and confusion. For page after page the authors lead the reader through an endless, serpentine maze, leaving a trail of “tantalizingly almost relevancies” as clues and, ultimately, leaving the reader breathlessly awaiting a resolution that never comes. This is high art (pun intended) that mirrors the “real world” without trying to explain it. One of the “lessons “ of the trilogy is that not only is the struggle by honest people to discover the truth behind the conspiracy futile, it is an essential part of the conspiracy! When conspiracy theorists, or people posing as conspiracy theorists, fail to turn up compelling evidence for their pet theory, or, even worse, make accusations or assertions that later turn out to be demonstrably false, they play into the hands of the conspirators. Not only have they wasted their time, they have undermined the credibility of anyone who agrees with them, anyone they agree with, or anyone that is working to find a solution to the problems created by the conspiracy.

I know that this last part is a little less obvious, but please bear with me. “Divide and conquer” is the essential strategy of all unholy conspiracies. An often unrecognized fact is that most people are basically good. A corollary is that bad people are always outnumbered and continually run the risk of being ganged up on and defeated by sheer numbers. I think this is the main attraction for conspiracy theorists. We feel that if only we could expose these vermin for what they are, the public would rise up and get rid of them once and for all. It is a very seductive thought but one that sadly has never seemed to work. Watergate brought down a president, his administration, and even sent some of his cronies and co-conspirators to prison. The poisonous legacies of President Nixon (and his puppet-masters) live on, however, continuing to undermine the Republic: the Federal Reserve Note, unquestioned legitimacy of the undeclared war, deficit spending, a “moderate” Republican Party. We won the battle and lost the war.

In answering a question about conspiracy, presidential candidate Ron Paul, gave a very cogent response. To paraphrase, there is no secret conspiracy, the groups that people associate with conspiracy (Council on Foreign Relations, for example) do exist and they do believe and promote ideas that undermine American sovereignty. Also they do and are creating institutions and passing laws to incrementally move America, and the world, toward their vision of an all-powerful global government. Some see his answer as an evasion. On the contrary, his answer was a simple statement of facts. He then quickly and legitimately focused on the real question, whose side are we on? Of these competing philosophies and ideologies, of these visions of the future, which do “We the People” choose?

So in answer to the question, “Is there a conspiracy?” I must answer, “Of course not.” How could there be a global conspiracy that spans decades and involves thousands of people without leaving an obvious trail of evidence? Is every news commentator in on the deal? If so, when are they inducted into the inner circle? And what could keep all of them, every last one of them, from ever telling the truth? Even if one confines the question to just the United States, the theories become grotesquely complicated. Where does it stop? Where does it begin? How are people recruited? How are they kept from defecting? How are they silenced if they do? Are all political party officials in on the conspiracy? Does that include John from down the street who chairs the county committee? Does it include all politicians? How about the city councilman, state legislator, our congressman, senator, every president? Isn’t it easier to believe that George Bush, and every president since Howard Taft, is simply stupid, greedy, or short-sighted? Such a sweeping Conspiracy theory is obviously ridiculous. It is simply impossible.

So to return to the question, “Is there a conspiracy?” Yes, Virginia, there is a conspiracy. There are people in this world who wield money and political power to further their own ends. They do so in secret, when it serves their ends, or, more usually, hide in plain sight. They are very adept at covering their trail and have almost infinite financial resources to do so. Their relationships, meetings, organizations, and even policy papers have been well documented. But you will never be able prove that a conspiracy exists, because there is no fact or piece of evidence so compelling that it will convince the public at large. There will never be a “smoking gun” because there will never be a defection by anyone in a position of true leadership. But that still does not explain how the conspiracy could extend its power so deeply into our society without tipping its hand.

As an answer to this paradox, I would propose the theory of the “virtual conspiracy”. The sad truth is that there is “none so blind as he that will not see”. And it is just too painful for most of us to believe that the men and women we have trusted as our leaders are either co-conspirators or witless tools in the hands of malevolent powers. Add to this the fact that those who have wrested control of the news media and public education have attained control over the only weapons we have to liberate ourselves; language and information. George Orwell described the process quite eloquently in his classic novel, 1984. By controlling and degrading the language, the tyrannical masters of his dystopia were able to insure their power forever. By substituting the truncated language “Newspeak” for English, they established a world in which words such as “liberty”, “freedom”, and “rebellion” no longer existed. Without the words, the concepts which they represented disappeared from thought. In the world of 1984, “revolution” was, quite literally, unthinkable.

How does that apply to our world? “They” do not have to bribe or coerce their minions into obedience. They do not have to worry about secret contracts that could be uncovered or loyalties that could switch. By the time a journalist, economist, lawyer, or politician has risen through the ranks he or she has already been transformed into an intellectual eunuch. Not stupid, oh no. These are intelligent, well-mannered, educated, and sophisticated zombies. They “know” that certain things are true, and are contemptuous of those who do not share their “enlightened” world view. For example, they pity the unwashed masses that do not understand why a nine trillion dollar debt is nothing to worry about because it is such a small percentage of the Gross Domestic Product. They smile knowingly and shake their heads at the ignorant peasants that don’t realize the dangers inherent in a currency backed by precious metals, or that fail to see the benefits of losing their jobs to Chinese peasants. They can only look on with pity at those who do not see the benefits of helping humanity finally transcend these barbarous loyalties to nations, ethnic groups, or family.

The Conspiracy is even more insidious, however. Membership in the virtual conspiracy is not absolute, it is relative. Almost anyone can be a member of the virtual conspiracy to some degree or even on some occasions. For example, when I use the term “letter carrier” instead of the “sexist” word, “mailman”, I am promoting the idea that our gender neutral society is somehow superior to the one in which I was raised. It implies that we have “advanced” to the point where a male is no longer the assumed breadwinner. I am doing my small part to erase from our collective consciousness the time when a husband and a father were not only an essential part of the family, but were also capable of supporting a family with a single income. In using the euphemisms of politically-correct speech, instead of the more straightforward, accurate, or archaic terms that have been expunged from “polite” language, I am encouraging the mind numbing effects of the Conspiracy’s Newspeak. It may have been a slip of the tongue on my part, or, more likely, I may have made a conscious decision to avoid the hassle and controversy associated with speaking plainly or honestly. Nevertheless, I have reinforced (in the mind of my reader or listener) the prohibition against logical thought in proscribed areas. I have tacitly admitted certain assumptions about history and our society that have become the secular religion. I have become a tool of the Conspiracy.

So, finally, the boundaries between the witless tool of the conspiracy and a true puppet master become blurred. The distinctions, for practical purposes, become meaningless. The true conspirators, the “inner circle”, must be pleased to see the “paranoid” conspiracy theorists charging across the political landscape, accusing one hapless victim after another. Like the bull charging after the cape of the matador, they become exhausted, discredited, and eventually humiliated. Simultaneously, they antagonize and discredit both themselves and their potential allies. Anyone observing this spectacle is unlikely to feel anything but pity or contempt for the “bull”. Such a scenario works so well to the conspirator’s ends that if the conspiracy theorists did not exist , the conspirators would be compelled to create them!

Faced with such a daunting foe, what then are we to do? Well, we can stop wasting our time and energy attempting the impossible. As sensible and attractive as it is to “Know thy enemy”, we need to set our priorities and pick our battles. We do NOT need to be able to define and describe in detail the workings or members of the virtual conspiracy. We do not need to determine who knew what and when they knew it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and looks like a duck; IT’S A DUCK!

I propose that we approach the Conspiracy with a technique called “reverse engineering”. Software developers, given the exact specifications for what a program will do, can produce another program that will reproduce its behavior exactly. In the end, it does not matter if every line of code is identical. If it looks like a duck, it’s a duck. And for our purposes, I propose that we can do the same with the Conspiracy. We need to observe “it” and the behavior of all relevant players in light of the competing goals of individual liberty and global fascism. If someone or something moves our nation or world toward slavery it ultimately does not matter if they are consciously evil or simply stupid; “they” are part of the virtual Conspiracy. With enough data we can produce an intellectual model, a replica that will allow us to predict “its” behavior and fight it at every turn.

If the forces of evil are using the events of 9/11 to undermine our personal liberties, bankrupt our nation, and destroy the middle-class; do we REALLY need to know whether the Conspiracy caused it to happen, let it happen, or is just taking advantage of a serendipitous event? Can we not vigorously oppose all of these developments on their merits? Do we really want to make our cooperation with other like-minded patriots contingent on their agreeing with our interpretation of a grainy video of an imploding skyscraper?

If John McCain has been known to make critical votes to undermine the sovereignty of America, supports endless wars of aggression that bankrupt our nation and if he attacks and smears those who would defend our liberty; do we REALLY need to show that he is a member of the Bilderberg Group?

If Barack Obama perpetuates the worst policies of his Republican predecessor, assassinates U.S. citizens without a trial, and consistently promotes a New World Order of global fascism, does it REALLY matter where he was born?

We do not need to document secret oaths, laundered money in offshore accounts, Masonic rituals, or black helicopters. We do not need to become super sleuths, prosecuting attorneys, polygraph operators, or forensic demolition experts. If it looks like a “duck”.... we need to get a better “shotgun”.

We should all strive to become better educators, authors, organizers, recruiters, and, yes, politicians. We do need to realize that we are all tainted by the virtual conspiracy, but that very few of us are consciously working to further its ends. We do need to become masters of discerning the policies, practices, and rhetoric that move us away from liberty. We do need to become relentless at exposing these things to public scrutiny. And when enough of us have done our homework, networked, and paid our political dues; it will become obvious who we can trust, and to what degree.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Driving through fog, driving a school bus.

Excellent analogy. And the kids are acting up in the back of the bus making it just that much harder, not realizing how very serious your job is.

Worth a 2nd Read Through

I am responding to keep this post bumped. I believe a 2nd read-through should be a must, just to understand the importance of this message. Cease and desist the divisional bickering, focus on the end goal, educate yourself first, use whatever the masses can relate to without telling them they are wrong -I think I've got it!

PyraBang for Liberty

great read

I am half way through Jim Marrs book The Fourth Reich~
its awesome!


LL on Twitter: http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
sometimes LL can suck & sometimes LL rocks!
Love won! Deliverance from Tyranny is on the way! Col. 2:13-15



Excellent! Very well

Excellent! Very well written. Clearly understandable. You pointed the arrow at the correct target...

Great ideas! Hip Hop Truth

Great ideas!
Hip Hop Truth


It's a good perspective

Essentially, what I'm getting from reading this is that we should focus on what we do know, rather than what we think we know. Is that right?

All our energy should be put into supporting what we believe in, and not what someone else might believe in?

As an example, we should not support McCain because of his public voting record, and not care about any evidence that could be uncovered that he is connected to a globalist agenda?

The thing is, that even if one is aware of and only focuses on obvious facts, sharing these facts alone does not wake people up. It takes something extraordinary, something like sharing a truth that has been hidden in plain view.

In some ways being a little paranoid is a good thing, because it really is nothing more than forming theories based upon experience and then causes people to want to search out and find the facts. It's investigative in nature, which I don't think is a bad thing.

Before I say much more, maybe I just didn't understand your overall point?

You are right that....

...sometimes a little paranoia is a good thing.

"even if one is aware of and only focuses on obvious facts, sharing these facts alone does not wake people up. It takes something extraordinary, something like sharing a truth that has been hidden in plain view."

This is true.
Like Michael's epiphany with "Nightline", it IS sometimes helpful for an individual to see the naked face of the Conspiracy to cause them to awaken.

Unfortunately, this is highly individualized and very difficult to reproduce or predict on a mass scale.

Some people would have gone through the same experience that he did and shrugged it off or come up with some rationalization to keep their world view intact. (It IS unsettling to suddenly realize that good old uncle Ted Koppel is one of "Them".)

What is even worse, it is even harder to transfer that impact to others more removed from the event. For example, people who would just HEAR about the events that Michael went through would have an even easier time discounting its significance.

Let me be clear; there is nothing wrong with pointing out evidence of a conspiracy. And the more compelling the better.

But we should never let that detract from the OVERWHELMING evidence for THE Conspiracy; which is so well documented, historically obvious and whose agenda is public record.

Even more, we should never let our debates over this or that particular conspiratorial event (e.g. 9/11), become the touchstone issue around which our movement's cooperation revolves. However, compelling it might be for a particular individual, it might be just another big turn off for another person.

Freedom First Society



The Virtual Conspiracy

So what is "The Conspiracy?"

So what is "The Conspiracy?"


Or just that there is always a conspiracy working against everything else?

If one man owns a banana shop, there's probably some other banana salesmen conspiring to get his business?

If one man is being supported by a group for President, there's probably another group conspring to stop him or elect someone else?

Therefore, no matter what you do, there are likely others conspiring against you, so only focus on making your conspiracy happen and ignore the others?

An interesting diatribe.

And yes, in the end, "if it walks like a duck,...."
You are right, we can just deal with the superficial.

However, the part about not having a massive trail of evidence is just plain wrong. There IS a massive trail of evidence.
It's called history.
That is "IF" you can read it correctly, by knowing the existence of the "virtual conspriacy' and recognizing its doings, and all the evidence becomes clear as the direction in which we've been steered.

You can see by history where this nation veered off course, and who did the veering. Follow those clues, see who they associated with, determine the intertwining of the associations with other members who've been observed doing sympathetic actions, and soon enough, you have your players identified. Then you watch them. As newer players entier the scene, they will associate with older known members, and the ability to watch the group continues. Unfortunately now, it is so big and tangled, and obscured by many things, that it is very difficult to see it all, and that is by their design.

But this is alot of work to do, and it's not likely that many people are going to do this amount of work. So, I do agree that using the superficial arguments can be effective in the PR work with newer recruits.

You are correct.

"There IS a massive trail of evidence.
It's called history.

Very true.
The book "Organize for Victory" by the Freedom First Society, for example, does an excellent job of documenting the historical Conspiracy.
(It is worth buying a few copies for your friends just for that part of the book alone.)

It presents evidence that is accurate, verifiable, and indisputable.

Where we go wrong is in focusing on the individual manifestations of the Conspiracy rather than the big picture.

Like the blind men and the elephant, we run the risk of confusion and disintegration of our movement:

"The Conspiracy is like a snake."
"No, the Conspiracy is like a tree trunk."
"No, No, No, the Conspiracy is like a wall."

We literally run the risk of missing the elephant in the room.

Freedom First Society



The Virtual Conspiracy

Makes a lot of sense

Thanks for the new perspective...this illuminates the priorities

Very interesting

So you are saying we don't have to prove how and why bad actions of people are bad, if they are bad, stop the people from doing them.

OK, so you also say that we need to be better educators, politicians, etc., apparently so that we can teach and recruit efficiently.

I like being freed up from proving "bad people" are connected with secret societies. So you are saying don't try to convince other people that they are associated with these secret societies, but just stick strictly to what they are doing to our liberties, our freedoms, our way of life. Stop the bigger than life talk about government involvement in 9-11 that might lose someone of like mind who simply would agree that we are staying in Iraq too long, we are there for protection of oil interest, the Iraqi people don't want us there. Keep them on our side by stopping there and don't go into the deep stuff of false flag, history of false flags, government conspiracy, elite agenda, Zionists, Jesuits, Bilderbergs, Bohemian Society, Committee of 300, Committee of 500, Skull and Bones, Freemasons, Luciferians, etc.

This sounds like a good plan. This would free me up, because I do have a tendency to want people who are close to me to be interested in the deep stuff.

Can you just explain one thing. You say, "How could there be a global conspiracy that spans decades and involves thousands of people without leaving an obvious trail of evidence? etc." Are you saying the answer to this very hard to understand phenomenon is simply, "Add to this the fact that those who have wrested control of the news media and public education have attained control over the only weapons we have to liberate ourselves; language and information."? Language confusion and information manipulation is how they hold their great big huge fusion of government, media, public, parties, police, etc. all together? Wow, hmm, wondered how they are able to do that. I thought much of it was payoff and much was blackmail. The secret societies do all these weird sexual rituals and I figured they have everyone afraid to tell anyone's secrets, because then theirs would be told. But that would not account for the everyday politician, voter, parties, and general neocons.

As I have always known, their propaganda tools and methods are the most professional on the face of the earth. They must have many who do nothing but put this network together. I have always known it does have a tremendous amount to do with semantics. They take every word we try to use to explain ourselves and twist it to their own purpose so that it is impossible to communicate.

Well this is definately something to think about and something I probably need to put into practice. No one will believe that the government is in on a big conspiracy, that the world is being poisoned from our skies, that UFOs are being kept secret, that false flags have always been used, etc. I simply lose them and push them off message.

Yes, Yes, I think you've got it!

You HAVE seen the big picture.
You, like most of the rest of us, realized that all of this could not have been happening just by accident.
Greed and stupidity can only explain so much... there MUST be a deeper explanation.

And I DO believe in a literal conspiracy; of media moguls, international bankers, etc.
And they probably DO use blackmail, assassination, and bribery when they must to further their ends.

What I am trying to suggest is the concept of the "virtual" conspiracy.

Most of the time They do not have to overtly manipulate events.
A simple nudge here and there is enough.

Only when they absolutely must do they do something that would be discoverable (like tampering with ballot boxes). Most of the time they can let their programmed minions do the dirty work without any need for direction from the top. The brainwashed masses accomplish the rest.

I suspect (and I admit that this is pure speculation) that They may not have known whether Hillary or Obama was going to win the Democratic nomination. And they may not even know or care which candidate wins in November.

Once the Conspiracy succeeded in setting up the no lose situation in November, They are quite content to let "nature" take its course.

Its not that they are sitting back passively, however. They are busy spinning the news to discredit any liberty minded candidates. For example, if John McCain loses in November, they will be ready to blame the Libertarian or Constitutional candidates or Ron Paul for creating "division" in the GOP.

See, I can predict the behavior of the Conspiracy almost as if I had a microphone inside their smoke filled rooms.

Freedom First Society



The Virtual Conspiracy

Virtual Games

Individual manifestations:


“See, I can predict the behavior of the Conspiracy almost as if I had a microphone inside their smoke filled rooms.”


definitely. They get themselves into no lose situations and then sit back and play with the sound. They have chosen all the players, and anyone they did not choose will get bashed into the ground until they quit or get killed if it takes that long.

Yes, quite a long read

but very easy to understand if one reads it in segments. Thank you! The last paragragh explains what "We The People" must do to to help regain our liberty.


I rarely read a post on Daily Paul that is this long, but I'm glad I read this. Ever since I became "paranoid" I've also maintained a certain detachment from my own emotions and opinions...enough detachment to question my emotional responses. In other words, I've been curious about the psychology of the conspiracy theorist, of which I am one.

Your post is contributing to a certain freedom that I've been seeking in this regard, so thank you for sharing your insight.

I know this might be hard reading but...

I'm going to bump it until at least the people who commented on my reply to Manystrom's Sunday thread have a chance to read it.

Yes, I think it is an important enough topic to keep it alive.

Freedom First Society



The Virtual Conspiracy

Worth your time to read

Keep this bumped. Well written. Clear and concise. Thank you for a pleasant, refreshing interlude.


'...truth is loved in such a way that those who love some other thing want it to be the truth, and precisely because they do not wish to be deceived, are unwilling to be convinced that they are deceived." --- St. Augustine, Confessions (10:23), 5th c.

'...truth is loved in such a way that those who love some other thing want it to be the truth, and precisely because they do not wish to be deceived, are unwilling to be convinced that they are deceived." --- St. Augustine, Confessions (10:23), 5th c.