VIDEO: FOXNews-12 yr old SanFrancisco Girl to Russian Troops: Thank You

0 votes

http://revolutionarypolitics.com/?p=94

12 Year Old Girl Tells the Truth on Fox News about Georgia. Fox News even had to cut them off right in the middle of the account of Georgian aggression even though they had just come from a commercial break 2 minutes prior to that.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you for this post

I have spread it around other message boards and people have said "it's a real eye opener" many times. Thank you.

"It is the responsibility of the patriot to protect his country from its government."

— Thomas Paine

"Endless money forms the sinews of war." - Cicero, www.freedomshift.blogspot.com

Agreed, good points!

Agreed, good points!

bump bump bump

----------------------------------------
Ron Paul Supporter Since 1997
“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with” Ron Paul

“We have allowed our nation to be over taxed and over regulated and overrun by bureaucrats, the founders would be ashamed of us for what we're putting up with.” Ron Paul

Wake up your neibors and co workers.

I say this because for most people to know the truth, we have to tell them. Of course most of us here already realize this. By the way, the link you posted is a great site. Thank you. I think I am going to get my guitar out and put in some rage against the machine.

Freedom!

Thank you very much

We are very proud of our site and our whole purpose is to help spread the truth. I am happy you like it.

http://RevolutionaryPolitics.com

Thank you

from me too.

Reuters is not Russian Media pal...

http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKLA33497420080810?p...

Read the timeline! I saved this article on my hard drive because it seems that Reuters is changing the versions in later postings.... Take note of this here.

http://RevolutionaryPolitics.com

FVCK OFF WAR MONGERERS!

I don't care which side of this conflict you are on.

The US should have gotten into this mess and we shouldn't follow through. We should follow the founding foreign policy principle of non-intervention.

What no one is mentioning

What no one is mentioning is that fact that Saakashvilli the Georgian President and his Minister of Defense are ISRAELI NATIONALS. They are not even from Georgia. Why would free Georgian people "elect" an Isreali President and then let him appoint an Isreali Minister of Defense? Why, because Georgia is a U.S. puppet state and the Russians know it. This whole thing as been in the making for atleast 3 or 4 years. Israel was hoping that this would distract the Russians enough for them to launch an airstrike on Iran, supported by the U.S. Its been all over the news that Israel has been wanting to bomb Iran and the U.S. rejected it last week and also that there is a huge naval force massing in the Strait of Hormuz. What went wrong is that Georgia invaded to early. The neocons and Israelis were wanting this to happen later in the fall and closer to the election, the U.S. wasn't quite ready to strike Iran yet, and I also think they underestimated the Russian response. The Russians are tired of our B.S. and I don't blame them. This whole thing has the potential to go nuclear if we are not careful, but the Georgian government are not the victims here the Georgian people are.

There ARE two aggressors here

To say the media is wrong by calling the Russians invaders is misguided. The Russians did invade Georgia. That should not be under dispute.

Georgia was aggressive towards those living in South Ossetia (which is part of Georgia) and the Russian citizens there. The Russians invaded the sovereign nation of Georgia to protect their citizens but now they're putting even more military force into the area which can be seen as aggression in the hopes of permanently occupying and eventually annexing South Ossetia.

There are two aggressors in this instance. The aggression of Georgia against the Russian citizens and the aggression of Russia against the nation of Georgia.

Agree 100%

Agree 100% that both are agrressors. What to me is increasingly frustrating is the slanted reporting by the MSM. Tell it like it is - Georgia attacked South Ossetia which caused Russia to respond. They responded at first to protect the citizens of South Ossetia. What they are doing now is imperialistic and has substantial geo-political implications. But there too... wasn't the response predictable? Georgia or whoever orchestrated the attack on South Ossetia must clearly have been able to predict what Russia would do. So why do it? It's a "Grand Chessboard." The great chess-players think many many moves ahead and the players in this game are world champions.
http://RevolutionaryPolitics.com

It's still not clear who fired the first shot

the Georgians or South Ossetians. There's a lot of jumping to conclusions here due to preconcieved bias. The Russians could have even set it up. Among people on this forum, there seems to be an awful lot of faith in Russia and the Russian MSM, which is a bit disturbing. If you can't trust the U.S. MSM, you're going to trust the Russian MSM?

Did you read the timeline I posted?

Here it is again...
http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKLA33497420080810?p...

Please Read this... I don't want you to think I'm a "Commi-sympethizer"

Reuters is British if you didn't already know... Not Russian... Although they may have been infiltrated too right?
(sarcasm)

http://RevolutionaryPolitics.com

To the BS flung by 'bfling'

Your analogy of Mexico invading the US is not a like-for-like comparison of the situation w/ Georgia and Russia. A more appropriate comparison would be if a state in northern Mexico (i.e., Coahuila or Nuevo Leon), just south of TX, had fought a civil war w/ Mexico a couple of decades ago and won there independence (albeit not recognized by the UN) because they were more aligned (ethnically and politically) with the people in South TX than they were w/ those in Mexico. Then after winning their independence, 90-95% of them applied for and were granted US citizenship. They also invited several US military personnel to help maintain order and preserve the peace in their semi-autonomous state. After vowing to "reign in" this rebel enclave, Mexico's newest "democratically" elected leader decides to launch a full-scale surprise attack on this territory. But unlike the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor, he instead targets the largest city and several small towns full of civilians, killing 1,500+ and 10 of the US peacekeepers.

Now you're telling me that the people of the US would not demand that their govt. take some military action against Mexico?? Please.

Continuing with this hypothetical scenario, we then find out that Russia has been training the Mexican army up until not even a month ago. And to top it off, they are going to fly additional Mexican troops home from another deployment to reinforce there front lines. Russia then has the nerve to demand that we stop "our" invasion of Mexico and to cease all aggression.

This is an apples-for-apples comparison, and I think it's safe to say we all know how the US public would respond.

'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.

'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.

DIGG!

http://digg.com/world_news/FOXNews_12_yr_old_SanFran_Girl_to...

The DP is proof that the grassroots support for Ron Paul and his peaceful message of individual liberty is large, real, and not going away!

Special information for "bfling"

From wikipedia definition of propaganda: Propaganda is a concerted set of messages aimed at influencing the opinions or behaviors of large numbers of people. As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense presents information in order to influence its audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the cognitive narrative of the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda.

Propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, manipulate cognitions, and direct behavior to achieve a response that furthers the desired intent of the propagandist.

This is exactly what FOX, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC and ABC are all about.
Notice in particular the phrase "lying by omission" with regards to the news coming from MSM about Georgia.

Love the talking head's final comment.

What BS!

___________

Lisa C.

www.dvds4delegates.com=Ron Paul, the 44th U.S. President

Join us at: www.campaignforliberty.com

Brought to you by: www.women4ronpaul.com

Ron Paul "Sign Wave Across the USA" -- November 5th!

I love how the older woman,

says when they are being cut off for the commercial break, that "I know, you don't want to hear that", and gets a "disgusted of MSM" look on her face. The lies of the MSM are apparent to the entire world.

and then the announcer trys to belittle her experience,

by saying that what she said, "is certainly what the Russians want".

and then he pontificates that there "are gray areas in war".

Talk about a total smear job.

He might as well just called them liars.

Article of interest

Sorry for the double-post - but I thought the following was a good article that explains the history of the region, and how US intervention is once again causing problems:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/JH13Ag05.html

Battling Lincolns?

Georgian Unionists and Russian Irredentists have run afoul of each other in their similar pursuits of Greater Republics. Thus far Mr Putin has shown himself to be quite Shermanesque in his handling of the inferior state of Georgia, as has been Mr Shaakashvili in his handling of the inferior states of Abkhazia & South Ossetia.

LXXI BC: Ego sum Spartacus // MDCCCLVII: I am Dred Scott // MCMVL: Ich bin Anne Frank // MMX: Je suis Assange // MMXI: Ik ben von NotHaus

Please Stop Feeding The Troll

Arguing with the troll is what gives a troll its power and it pulls you away from working on something positive. Don't fall into it's trap.

We all know it's a troll, no need to point it out. Us longtime Dailypaulers can spot a troll a mile away.

Focus on something positive, ignore the troll.

Don't get embroiled in arguments, only discussions.

Haha...

Kinda like the dark side giving a sith it's power!!!

May the force be with us...

"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK

There is something called programming schedules.

Interviews are allotted a certain amount of time. Commercials have to be aired, by contract. Clearly the time alotted to the interview had elapsed and they to move on to a commercial. If it were true that they brought in a commercial because of what they woman was saying rather than because the time had elapsed and they HAD to bring on a commercial, then why did they allowed her to wait through the commerical break and give her 30 seconds to afterwards to give her a chance complete her thought? They would not have. They would have just ended the interview. They didn't have to bring her back on but they did. There is a programing schedule they have to keep up with so they had to make it quick.

If you're going to have a complain about the media, make it about something realistic. This is just stupid.

Your "stupid" assertation doesn't make sense since:

1. There had been a commercial 2 minutes prior
2. The host had not explained that it was Georgian bombs during the lead-up
3. The host minimized the interview by ending with the dismissive "there are gray aeas in war" statement (didn't seem gray to the people there)

and the biggest reason

4. Fox news coverage has been almost all AGAINST Russia.

Faux, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN...

They have all been repeating that its Russia...Russia "invaded", Russia "attacked"...the thing is, Georgia attacked and bit off more than they can chew, and now they are playing victim and begging for help from the rest of the world.

I believe the whole thing is a smoke screen for something bigger to come...

"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK

Russia DID invade

There is no question about that. Russia invaded a soveriegn country. It's a true statement. They're being filmed with cameras right now. They're there.

Saying that Russia invaded, is not saying that Georgia did not attack Ossettia.

Give it up already!!!

It's OBVIOUS that Russia is in Georgia...no one is disputing that. The point is the biased reporting by the media...making Russia look like the aggressor, when it's Georgia. The later is NOT being reported...do you get it!!!

"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK

Russia IS the agressor.

They invaded a soveriegn country. That's like Mexico invading the U.S. because of a internal dispute.

There are apparently two aggressors. Possible Georgia aggressed on Ossettia when they tried to secede, AND Russia aggressed on Georgia after this happened. An invasion is an aggression. Troops from one country being deployed on the soil of another country without that government's consent is by definition an invasion. It's aggressive.