Ebert Reviews IOUSA
I saw this review of I.O.U.S.A. on Roger Ebert's website and was pleasantly surprised at the contents of the review. While I might have a few quibbles here and there, it was nice to see a "mainstream" person actually putting the truth out there.
From the review:
I remember when "Made in China" meant cheap and shabby merchandise. No longer. In the ranking of the trade imbalance among all the world's nations, China is first with the highest surplus, and the United States is last with the largest deficit. The Chinese now hold a huge chunk of our debt. If they ever call in the loan, it would destroy our economy. In the presidential debate earlier in the year, Ron Paul was a lonely voice talking about the debt; the others on both sides paid lip service to the problem and moved on.
Roger Ebert, at least, gets it.





















Well, what was shown with the post was
okay, but in reading the full article....I disagree with alot of what he says....
Berwick, Columbia County, Pennsylvania
Ron Paul 2012 - The People's Choice
rEVOLution SuperPAC: http://www.revolutionpac.com/
WTP Federal Lawsuit to BAN ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2011-07-26...
Isn't this movie from a left wing perspective?
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
----
Don't blame me if there's no voice for liberty opposing McCain and Obama in the Presidential debates. I donated to Ron Paul Libertarian, Bob Barr's campaign.
Well, I obviously don't
Well, I obviously don't agree with raising taxes.....
I think, for moral, philosophical, and reality reasons, the best solution would be to drastically reduce the size and scope of government and literally start cutting anything that isn't absolutely necessary, and of course end the overseas military spending and aid.
And of course, get rid of the IRS/income tax so that people can keep their money (after all, it's rightfully theirs), and that way they'll have all their money to take care of themselves and we won't even need the government programs.
Then of course, there will still be people who are dependent on the government for help, and we can help them, but everyone else just has to opt out, and then we'd be able to cover those dependent on the system.
he only half gets it
this movie is getting us primed to pay more taxes.
The banksters want to make sure they get theirs.
--------------------------------------
http://silversnowball.com/291
----------------------------------
"The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government". ~ Founding Fathers
Does Ebert know what he is talking about?
He says that China can "call in the loan." Loans are for a specific time frame (ie. 5 years, 10 years). A person can't just call a loan in early.
Not sure how it works now,
Not sure how it works now, but banks usually reserve the right to call in loans.
Pretty sure it was in the Money Masters documentary where they were talking about something like JPMorgan falsely predicted the fall of a large bank in the early 1900's (Pre 1913) and alot of people made a run on the bank which caused the bank to call in their loans causing people to lose their houses and other items they had bought with those loans.
It ultimately depends on the specific loan contract
Yes, some loans could have it written into the contract...
However, the security in question with China is the US Treasury Bill.
A Treasury Bill cannot be called at any time in by the purchaser. They only get their money back on the expiration of the time-frame stipulated in the contract.
Full Article
The header for this article on his Main Page is but doesn't show when you read it:
I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20...
A few things need to be corrected here
I have not seen the movie, but heard it was good, but missed the cause of the problems.
First, the one guy was right China cannot call the loan by loan we are talking about Treasury securities issued and backed by the government, those do in fact have terms. 90-day, 1 year, 2 year 3 year, 5 and 10 year securities. Those pay interest, and China cannot call them.
Loans that are callable are credit lines or credit facilities for corporations or other more liquid loans that are based on loan covanents. If your business takes out a loan and agrees to remain so much in cash or achieve so much in sales you have to provide that data to the bank regularly. If you miss those provisions your debt can be called. You agree to those terms. Treasuries trade in a primary market which to whom they are sold and then a secondary market. So, China would have to sell them in the seconary market, Treasuries are not callable to the issuer the American Gov't.
China can however, sell them effectively calling them. If China were to dump them on the open market taking whatever price was able to move them the dollar would collapse, and this is why everyone in this forum that gets it are so scared.
We are one event away from the dollar collapsing. I personally think that event is the bombing of Iran by Israel. Iran will stop selling oil to the world through dollars, China, Russia and a number of other countries will begin to trade oil in euros, or yuan or chickens it doesn't really matter at that point.
Once that happens, the dollar will be worthless, nations will dump dollars to buy oil in other currencies. I was talking to a major economist in this country will I have to leave nameless, and he said the dollar is naturally unwinding as other nations diversify away from dollars and into other global currencies, and that it will happen gradually and naturally.
I disagree. I am an economist by trade, not that that means anything, but when you hold something that is nearing worthless, do you hang on to it in hopes that it regains its value, or do you quickly move to the next thing that will be valuable and allow you to trade and protect your standard of living?
You get the point, nobody will want to hold dollars at that point. Then our new currency the Amero will be ushered in and with the full faith and credit of the US gov't damaged and our economy wrecked by all this, we the American people who live in fear and misinformation will jump at the opportunity to join with Mexico and Canada and the next leg of the New World Order will be ushered in. And the tipping point will be upon us for economic unions throughout the world.
If America was smart and wanted to restore the trade inbalance we would remove our sugar import taxes and raise our corn prices. Essentially, creating an OPEC like entity that controls the export of our Corn and Soybeans. Since, we have the world's greatest supply of corn and soybeans and the ROW is so hungry to grow and eat better food and achieve a higher standard of living, we could effectively do what the middle east has done to us.
The problem is the bush's, clinton's and banker's of the world believe in population control and need the dollar to collapse to usher in the next union which will be far more of value to them, as opposed to higher export prices for our food and natural gas which would provide value to the entire country of the US especially the midwest and the south.