Anyone else noticed a pattern here??

I have noticed an interesting pattern among certain member's posts here on the DP, and thought I'd see if anyone else has any thoughts about this. I believe that the neocon / McCain camp is employing bloggers to spread confusion and disinformation, and to attempt to influence and decieve the newer (or more gullible) Ron Paul Revolutionaries. The most recent episode of this is the push to engender support for Palin (and of course McCain by default), especially by the most prominent of these 'trolls', bedr1. As an example, here are just a few of the headlines of posts authored by 'bedr1' over the last couple of days, which try to capatilize on McCain's slick move with Palin. When you look at the big picture here, can there be ANY doubt that 'trolls' are here, and that they work for the neocons.

"CNN Interview: Ron Paul says he Likes Sarah Palin"

"Sarah Palin against the Real ID act"

"Palin says Iraq war not worth fighting for if its about oil"

"Palin for President!!"

"Sarah Palin Was Pat Buchanan's 1996 Alaska State Coordinator - I knew I liked her : watch video"

"My First reaction to Sarah Palin - She's Good!"

"Some interesting links to Ron Paul supporters last summer on why Palin would make a great VP for Dr. Paul"

It reminds me of the approach that the same 'member(s)' have been using for pushing Bob Barr. Here's some more from "bedr1"

"Bob Barr on Glenn Beck tonight at 7pm EST"

"Ron Paul will vote for Bob Barr for President on the Texas ballot and here is why "

"Non Ron Paul website touting Open Gop Convention & Poll Please write in Barr or Baldwin"

"08/15/08 NEW ZOGBY Poll 55% of Americans want Bob Barr in Debates - Barr still at 6% Nationally"

OR, here's another example of an attempt by 'bedr1" to subtly attack a great, effective educational program:

"Is DVDfordelegates.com a scam? "

There are several user names currently being employed by these disinformation agents, the newest of which is "RonBarr" (a member for less than a day..... come on!) who post things like:
"9/11 inside job" people had to taint the most important rally."

I did a little poking around using the 'tracking' feature, and found that several user-names consistantly appear together on posts of this nature. "Preferred", "JFEJ004", "RonBarr", bedr1, etc. One thing I found interesting is that most of these 'usernames' DON'T have the 'Contact' feature enabled, which would allow them to be contacted directly. That seems suspicious in itself, as well as the habit of constantly changing usernames, using multiple usernames, etc. Another thing that jumped out at me was that 'bedr1' usually sets up the posts, and then somehow, as if by a miracle, JFEJ004 shows up almost instantly to 'second' the message of the post, when in fact, it's the same guy just proping himself up.

The neocons are smart, and they use deception, half-truths, diversionary tactics, and division to accomplish their goal of weakening the freedom movement. What they do is to put people out there that SEEM like they are in line with Dr. Paul's message (like Bob Barr and Palin) who might come just close enough to convince people that, well, they might not be so bad after all (and hope that we overlook that Barr voted for the patriot act, and that Palin couldn't possibly be what we're looking for either, by the very act of accepting the spot as McCain's running mate).

These 'trolls' also regularly attack issues that are crucial to the success of the Revolution, such as 'DVD's for Delegates', the pursuit of 9/11 truth, and the impeachment of Bush/Cheney. It seems that when we are sniffing around sensitive and effective areas of inquiry that the neocons want to diffuse and/or keep hidden, they send in the disinfo trolls in droves.

I post this to try to give a little bit better 'big picture' view when it comes to these guys. I defend the right to free speech, and don't expect everyone to agree on everything, but I also think that when certain people are sent here by the 'enemy' expressly to deceive, divide, and distract, that it deserves a response. On a positive note, it also shows that we have them worried, otherwise they wouldn't have 'trolls' on their payroll. We need to keep the pressure on, think for ourselves, and not fall into their traps of half-truths and confusion.