Ron Paul vs Hillary

I think Ron stands a much better chance of beating Hillary than Rudy does. What Republican is going to vote for Hillary? And Ron will get the indies, libertarians, constitutionalists and disgruntled republicans along too....bingo! A winner. An amazing jump from an 'unknown' candidate to what would happen against Hillary!



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"President AGAIN"??!!!

How many people have picked up on the following "slip of the tongue" from Hillary as she was being interviewed on her immigration stance by Candy Crowley of CNN yesterday? I first heard it today while listening to the radio and have heard no one follow the thought to the obvious question.

"Then in an interview yesterday CNN’s Candy Crowley…
CROWLEY: If I wrote a story that said: "Absent a broad illegal immigration bill, Hillary Clinton agrees about giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants," is that correct?
CLINTON: No. What I have said is that I support what governors are trying to do. And governors are on the front lines because of the failures to get comprehensive immigration reform. There are already eight states that issue driver's licenses without any verification of citizenship. That is a decision that the governors and legislatures and the people of those states have made. I understand…
CROWLEY: But you see why people think…
CLINTON: Well, but you know, Candy…
CROWLEY: … that you are not answering the question.
CLINTON: Well, but you know, Candy, well, but I think that if you go back and look at the complexity of this issue, I don’t think a lot of these hard questions lend themselves to raising your hand. And I know that that’s easier in a 30 second context to try to do. I think the fact that governors are being forced into this position is really unfortunate. They should not be making immigration policy. The federal government should be making immigration policy and that’s what I’m going to try to do as president again and I do not believe that in the context of federal immigration reform that that would be an issue that governors would have to contend with."

Hypothetical Question: If Hillary Clinton WAS the President, when we thought it was Bill Clinton that was elected, and a President can only serve two terms in office, why is she running AGAIN?! She should be disqualified as she already served her two terms!!!

"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom." Patrick Henry

Yep, I'm aware of that very

Yep, I'm aware of that very telling Freudian slip.

===Signature===

"Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests." --George Washington

Ron Paul Will Defeat Hillary

No doubt about it. Hillary has been exposed for the Closet, Double Talking Neo-Con that she is. 50% of Americans have already said they WILL NOT vote for her. Paul's platform is the only one on the GOP side that can beat her and he will.

The real trick is that Rupert Murdoch, for example, at FOX wants people to pick Giuliani ... but he is content if Hillary still gets the nod, because he knows that she will still fulfill his Zionist interests. That's what many people don't realize. Murdoch wants Hillary over Ron Paul. I say we put this Zionist Billionaire in his place. We want a President that has America's best interests at heart. Not Israel's.

It's okay if the Neo-Cons

It's okay if the Neo-Cons will vote for Hiliary over RP. She can have 200 of them. We will take everyone else. This was a GREAT interview. Ron did great.

to increase the chances of RP winning the GOP nomination

Boots on the ground and tied over some fresh blood: young, old, middle, pathetic, apathetic, poor, rich, so-so, all walks of life. Remember, the message of Freedom is popular and RP has convinced us so let's keep spreading the message.

What the hell is the

What the hell is the difference between Ghouliani and Hillary? To me, it would be like voting for the same person, i dont see that they have any major differences on anything. Honestly that would have to be the dumbest election i have ever seen in my life. If that happens i give up all hope that anything will ever change here.

"Its time for a new Revolution! Ron Paul 2008"

"You don't gain much by being angry. I see this more as an intellectual, philosophical fight than a political, personality fight." - Ron Paul

No Difference Between Clinton and Ghouliani

They are the same. That is why the msm want them to win the nominations. They get what they want either way.

Only one difference between Hillary and Rudy...

...the dress size.

Awesome!

Yes! We are finally talking about putting Ron Paul up against Hillary! This is where he belongs! Talking about taking down the BIG FISH baby!

The mainstream media is dead.

The mainstream media is dead.

Ron Paul vs Hillary

KISS... Keep it Simple Stupid! I wasn't even gonna vote for any one until Ron Paul came on the scene. It will be Ron Paul or NO ONE. I will write him in if need be, but I'll be damn if I'm gonna ever vote for the lesser of two evils again. Dr. Paul already said (if he doesn't win the nomination) he isn't gonna support any of them if they don't change their positions to fall within the constitutional boundries. Why would I do anything different either?

A Perfect Vote

I know exactly what you are saying. I have voted at every Presidential election since I was 18. But never with any great enthusiasm. When I vote for Ron Paul, I will be making the one and only, absolutely perfect vote of my lifetime.

another beautiful interview

I am in awe of this man. The intellect and dignity he displays as he answers these questions are enormous, especially at the end when asked about his "tactics" if he is to run against a woman. His answer is precious and pure Ron Paul. A philosopher as our president is what this country needs and he's here. Continue your support as energetically as you can.

So true. It is astonishing

So true. It is astonishing to me that he is not polling at 99% (allowing for a few radical extremists/communists/fascists). I'm not exaggerating. How can anyone not see his integrity?

===Signature===

"Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests." --George Washington

I've been harping on this

I've been harping on this forever. Clinton will mangle Guliani. All she has to do is bring up his reputation among many citizens of NYC as a jack-booted thug, then introduce her husband to the stage. "Oh, did I mention that Bill will be the First Husband?" Game, set, match.

Paul, on the other hand, could beat Clinton simply by holding up a copy of the Constitution during the debates, and staring Clinton dead in the eye. Her own record as a habitual violator of her oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" will be enough to hang her.

This is why Paul has been blacklisted by the MSM: they want Clinton. This is also why I say Guliani was not behind the "spambot" accusations; Guliani considers Paul a non-contender, but Clinton has much to fear. And don't forget that the left controls the university system that cooked up that smear against Paul (show me a conservative professor and I'll sell you a bridge), and the media that suddenly remembered his name and pounced on the first negative story on him.

Mark my words: if Ron Paul is not the Republican nominee, Hillary Clinton *will* be our next president.

=====================

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:

1. Soap
2. Ballot
3. Jury
4. Ammo

Please use in that order.

--Ed Howdershelt (Author)

Some Neocons at FreeRepublic.com Will Vote for Hillary Over RP

Folks,

There is a big rumble going on for the control of the arch-conservative www.freerepublic.com.

Half the people there are shifting toward Ron Paul now.

But the Neocons are actually saying they would rather vote for Hillary.

That shows their true colors.

Neocon = Socialist Big Government Democrat

The only difference between a Democrat and a Neocon is that a Neocon believes the surge worked (I happen to agree on that point but my only point of agreement with the Neocons was the Iraq War and that war is now just about over).

And?

Were you able to tell them that before they banned you?

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers

You are correct

You said "Neocon = Socialist Big Government Democrat"

So many neocons don't even understand this fact. Neoconservatism is a backlash movement started by disenfranchised leftists who decided they had gone too far and that America was becoming too Caligula-esque. While their cultural views did a 180, they held strong to their Marxist roots, economically.

=====================

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:

1. Soap
2. Ballot
3. Jury
4. Ammo

Please use in that order.

--Ed Howdershelt (Author)

Neocons Think They Can Control Whom We Meet and Marry

[Neoconservatism is a backlash movement started by disenfranchised leftists who decided they had gone too far and that America was becoming too Caligula-esque. While their cultural views did a 180, they held strong to their Marxist roots,]

Really? Interesting.

So that would explain their preoccupation with hating sex.

I had thought that the old conservatives were the ones who still wanted to recriminalize premarital sex, for instance.

But now that I think of it, Ron Paul is not going to push to stop porn or strip clubs, which is good because 90% of men like that stuff including most active duty servicemen.

It is the Neocon movement that has helped the liberals get as many American men registered as sex offenders as possible. When their quota is not met, they grab men who were caught skinny dipping with their girlfriends or streakers at baseball games. And everyone knows the story of the Indiana man who recently stopped to pull a drug-crazed teenager off a busy highway where she was meandering...the Neocons on the jury apparently felt "sorry" for him as they saved him from going to jail by "only" giving him sex offender status.

And it is the Neocon movement that has completely opened the henhouse doors to the NOW. The NOW has created supposedly conservative "women's" organizations like the Independent Womens Forum (IWF directed by Michelle Bernard) and the Tahirih Justice Center.

Both of these organizations have no problem with the VAWA and IMBRA laws, the first of which allows a woman to make false accusations against her live-in boyfriend and steal his house and bank account. IMBRA says that American men must now be background checked before being allowed to say hello to a foreign woman online (if the website specifically introduces foreigners with Americans).

So Neocons, like Dems, think they can tell us whom and how we meet and possibly marry others. IMBRA goes on to say that an American is only allowed to marry 2 foreigners per lifetime.

I am not kidding. Read it here: www.veteransabroad.com/IMBRA2005.pdf

A recently hired Neocon judge, Thomas Rose, recently ruled on IMBRA saying "The Supreme Court has never held that there is a fundamental liberty interest in an American contacting a foreigner".

Hillary already defeated Rudy for Senator...don't you remember?

Carpet Bagger had a lot of dirt on old Rudy and he bailed out due to health issues.

She'd like nothing more than to face him.
For one, she'd never have to worry about him bringing up family values.

Ron Paul is the only Republican who can defeat any of the Democrats.

We shouldn't take for granted that Hillary will win...it's actually hers to lose...the Press has already declared her and Rudy as the winners.

So sorry to rain on their Parade:-)

hillary is joke!

I saw a great bumpersicker today... it said
IF LIFE IS A BITCH....WHY VOTE FOR ONE with a picture of hillary on it.. to dang funny! now to ADVOCATE.. how you can turn out to support Ron Paul then say if Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination you'l vote for hitlery is beyond me.. get a clue son! they are exact opposites!!!!!

JANE AND YOUR ANTI-HILLARY OBSESSION

Here we go again... So many positive things we can say about Ron Paul and Jane always comes back to the Hillary Bashing because she has a thing against Hillary...
I would naturally vote Ron Paul over Hillary
If Ron Paul is not on the ballot, I will vote Hillary over Ghouliani.
How could *any* of you vote for man who snickers and sniggers at Ron Paul when he is speaking at his podium.

I personally feel (and again its just me) that if Ron Paul is nowhere to be seen come election day, its Hillary over Ghouliani any day. The thought of that lisping creep as president makes *me* shudder...

You're damned right..

..I'm anti-Hillary alright and proud of it -- she is an openly communistic and blatantly lying, creepy political operative who ran the goon squad that harassed her husband's victims to shut them up. She's worse than Hitler.

What are you, anti-woman?

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers

Amen

We have to keep in mind that Hillary would drop like a fly but for the POWER behind her, propping her up. Usually people with raw power cannot do it without help from some entity MORE powerful then they.
She is so communistic/marxist that I wouldn't be surprised she talks to Uncle Joe himself! Remember when she "talked to" Eleanor Roosevelt?

Don't forget the PRC owes them big time especially after Billy Boy gave them some top secret nuclear technology. It is my belief that their payback is through the mysterious "donors" and the lot of dirty money coming in to her campaign.

All of this is public knowledge printed at the time in the papers. For anyone to say that telling THE TRUTH about someone is bashing them, let them call it what they wish, but the naive people out there must be made aware of who they are voting for. It must be the truth though and not gossip for gossip's sake because we may not like a personality.

There has been plenty told about this couple from those with firsthand knowledge to tell it....those who worked with them! Many risk their life and livelihoods to tell the truth about them...it is not pretty. Imagine stealing the White House furniture...yes, that too was in the papers at the time they left office.

On the other hand, even though I would not vote for ANY of the other "Republicans" or Democrats, and NONE of them are without scandal, or have much in the way of integrity, Constitutional or otherwise, the basest of them all is She! There is no honor, let alone a conscience in her AT ALL! It would be better to stay home on Election Day than to vote for her.

"Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom." Patrick Henry

The lesser of two evils is

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

I happen to disagree that Clinton is less evil than Guliani, but only just barely. That said, if Paul doesn't get the nomination, I'm still voting for him as a write-in -- and so should you, if you truly support his principles.

If you voted for Clinton over Guliani, you would only give her a higher winning percentage, and thus a stronger mandate -- a "blank check" to run roughshod over the Constitution. She would beat Guliani regardless; your goal, if it comes down to a Clinton/Guliani race, should be to reduce her ability to claim a mandate, as much as possible. This doesn't mean voting for Guliani, since that would only add to his percentage and cause Clinton to adopt some of his ideas to increase her approval rating. No, we should all vote for Paul no matter what, and hopefully, if he does not win, at least his respectable percentage will convince the winner to take notice and listen to us.

=====================

There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:

1. Soap
2. Ballot
3. Jury
4. Ammo

Please use in that order.

--Ed Howdershelt (Author)

Write-in option if it comes to that

We must get prepared for this, just in case, for 2 reasons:

1) Ron Paul will not run as an independent - if he doesn't win the Republican Primary, it will literally be up to us to draft him as President as a write-in

2) You can't just write in your candidate and have that vote counted come election day. You have to get a fair number of petition-signers to even allow him to be a legitimate write-in. You then still have the daunting task of publicizing that he is a legitimate write-in candidate on your ballot.

You can write in any

You can write in any declared candidate for President in all fifty states, that is law. But you're right about the daunting task of getting the message out. The time to do that is now.

5% of people make things happen
10% of people watch things happen
85% say "What happened?"

Rudinineleven Gulianineeleven May Start Working With Ron Paul

Wait a minute here folks...

If Julie Annie wins the Primaries and Ron Paul is offered control over the RNC and takes it, then RP supporters should please vote the Republican for President over the radical feminist Hillary.

I predict, however, that the fight against Rudy is going to come down to a floor fight next September at the Republican Convention.

I would agree that, if Rudinineeleven Gulianineeleven sticks his finger up at the libertarian crowd, then everyone should vote 3rd Party.

I maintain that, for me and many others, the "Terrorists War on Us" is not a major issue that would cause us to decide one way or the other. But the position someone has on the Constitution and Big Government is critical. Rudy is going to have to say that he wants at least one government agency to be dismantled.

By the way, Rudy's "Terrorists War on Us" sounds like "Toys R Us".

I agree with his position on the terrorists (keeping a good offense) but it is not as important as the other issues Ron Paul talks about.

Not a chance in hell!

Sorry, but if ANY of the other Republican candidates starts sucking up to Ron Paul in any way,shape, or form, run like hell in the other direction. This will be, at its most fundamental level, them trying to cozy up to Ron Paul's supporters. Period! I, for one, would be highly insulted by this knowing that not one of them really believes in anything Ron stands for, and would NEVER consider Ron for any sort of partnership if they didn't fear him.

Ron Paul as Vice President under Giuliani = me voting Libertarian.
Ron Paul as controller of the RNC = me voting Libertarian.

I will not be wasting my vote supporting some unprincipled, corrupt, pandering douchebag simply because he sucked up to Ron Paul.

The good news is this... Ron Paul has too much integrity to ever accept such a position under a fool like Giuliani, so it won't matter.

Should Ron NOT win the Republican nomination, he will certainly be drafted as the Unity '08 Presidential candidate, and he will be on the ballot in all 50 states. If you don't know about Unity '08, go to the website and register. (www.unity08.com, I believe) This is the unofficial contingency plan for Ron's campaign should the R's somehow not understand that they need him.

With WHAT ballot access??? (nt)

...

PLEASE BOYCOTT ANY ATTEMPTS TO ASSOCIATE RON WITH UNITY '08

This is just a ploy by Democrats to corrupt the process and get their little communist feet into the process. DON'T FALL FOR IT. It is NOT the official NOR unofficial contingency plan!

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers

We will want our kind running for Congress. Open seats available

Howard Dean accepted the DNC chairmanship. I don't know how much power he gained by that or if the move just shut him up (it would have come with a good cash flow I assume).

Now, if RP loses to Julie Annie in the Primaries and there is clearly going to be no floor fight next September...I am just curious as to how much actual power the Republican leadership might give him, assuming that Howard Dean was ever really given power as opposed to something that would shut him up.

I just want to know what the possibilities are. I want to see a revolution take place within the entire Republican Party and it is not too late for guys like Ron Paul to be chosen to run for the open Congressional seats for next years election.

Take for instance Will Breazeale running in North Carolina. This Iraq War vet is a great libertarian Republican who can win.

Once we have a great organization, we will not only want to push for the Presidency, but for our kind to enter Congress.

In many of the bad laws passed over the past 8 years, there were ZERO members of Congress except for Ron Paul who voted against them

The power to choose which candidates represent Republicans

What I meant is that, a real power position would be the person who chooses who gets to run for office in each state and what the criteria are for that person and what platform to take.

Here is an example: Will Breazeale told me that, in order to be allowed to run for Congress in North Carolina as a Republican, he had to attend a few days of "training" in Washington.

They told him to concentrate on 1) Winning the war on terror and 2) Opposing illegal immigration. This has to be his main thrust. They also said he could have his own issues after that.

How nice of them.

devil

devil .... the establishment wants a julie-annie hitlery race.. why vote for either.. THROW A PROTEST VOTE OR BETTER YET WRITE IN RON PAUL!! hitlery and julie-annie are the same dude! figure it out!

If Julie Annie is nominated...

I will stay home or vote third party.

...so blunt!

I just showed this video to an aunt from out of town (who knew nothing about the guy) and was thrown back about how he seems to be so direct and that if Hillary is Slick Hilly, Ron Paul is about as slick as sandpaper...

She says, she's never heard a guy speak so much truth and never tried to dumb down his message or hit us with a fear or anger card.

He's humble and softspoken. And he pooh-poohed the idea of using some kind of divisive strategy against the gender card.

She said this guy is crazy enough to win!

RW Conspiracy Theory: Hillary is behind Paul's fundraising

I just wanted to leave a note here saying that I heard Rusty Humphries last night speculate that Hillary was behind Paul's $4.2 million dollar fundraising effort. He thought that Hillary would somehow benefit from a Paul nomination, but he was really grasping at straws without really providing any real evidence.
But I wouldn't be surprised to see or hear more of this type of nonsense coming from the mainistream Republican noise machine.

That's desperate for you...

..and very stupid of them also. I didn't realize Hillary was telling me what to do...or maybe it was a Hillary spambot, I dunno. But I still don't know how it got into Mom's Basement...

LOL!

That's funny

Ron Paul would be Hillary's worst nightmare. She'd do much better against any of those other fools who are trying to out-Bush Bush.

Labels, Polls, People

When observing behavior in people, especially during these times, would it not be better to relinquish party labels altogether and stand firm with an individual, a human, who happens to be the best person for the task at hand; leading this country out of the turmoil purposely created for selfish intent by clinging to the stubborness and hatred of "party affiliation" ????

Ron Paul happens to be the best person for all choices presented, regardless of party.

If one purely seeks pride, for whatever the reason, then translation and understanding of point of view becomes perverted with self interest. Democracy and The Constitution was never designed for that kind of shallow thought.

Thank you.

trying to exclude Ron Paul

Even after Ron Paul's awesome fund raising, the media is still trying to exclude him from debates. Particularly the Dec. 4 debates.
Get your key pads a typing.

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Will_Ron_Paul_Be_Excluded_...

These people are getting desperate and will stop at nothing.
Our shear force can, has and will change things.
I get the feeling sometimes that these negative articles are testing Ron Paul's support. They write a cruddy article and Ron Paul supporters respond.
If we don't respond en mass it may look like support is dwindling. So keep writing.

Go Ron Paul!

none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

heres how it plays out

Paul vs Clinton, Paul wins, landslide! Paul vs Obama, Paul wins but not as easy as Clinton. Paul vs Edwards, now you have a battle, but Paul wins. You have to look at the overall view of it to understand why I say this. And that is what the other side looks at too. Who can really beat who. Edwards is the CFRs secret weapon if it comes down to it, thats why if you noticed why all of a sudden he is so honest and "truthful", tell you in such a way to let you know , he understand, vote for the other guys( in his party), but they wont deliver, but hey " I'm telling you the truth, now" and the truth hurts, he just leaves out the little CFR fact.

Cart before the horse

We, The Ron paul Revolution, need to focus on the task at hand. Beating Rudy and Romney in the primary. We need to come up with a realistic scenario for how we are going to overcome those machines before we worry about the general election. Trudy McRompson is the only thing we need to focus on now.

I wouldnt be so quick to annoint Hillary Clinton Just yet. Obama still has alot of fight in him and a hell of alot of cash to throw around.

Except

By plugging Ron Paul as the only GOP candidate who has a chance at beating Hillary, we help our initial cause. Republicans REALLY don't want Hillary in office, and I'm one of them. I WILL NOT, I repeat WILL NOT have that woman as my Commander-in-Chief.

RP08

Die hard Republicans won't believe Ron can beat Hillary

They still don't feel Ron has a shot at the R nomination, so why would they even take the time to consider whether or not he could beat the D nom?

The party faithful, on both sides, are blind to reason. It's the reason they align themselves with a party in the first place as opposed to thinking and analyzing candidates on their own merits. It's so much easier to assume that a candidate for their party has all the same values, and will always act accordingly. We all know this is complete BS, but most can't see it.

Then, you still have the core GOPers who think the War on Terror is a good thing. They won't back Ron under any circumstances, because they are afraid. They honestly believe the evil terrorists are going to come here and kill us all, or that we'll all be living under Sharia law come 2015. They have no ability to reason. That's why they just accept what the R establishment feeds them.

So don't wate your time trying to convince R's that Ron has the best chance of winning the general election. They won't care.

And just one more note... Voting for someone just because you think they have the best chance of beating the opposition is inherently bad policy in the first place. Ron would never advocate trading principle for victory. It's this kind of thinking that all of the other R's are banking on, and rightfully so, because it's always about not letting the other guys win. Giuliani himself said in one of the debates (and many times since) that "You have to ask yourself who is the most electable. Who it is that has the best chance of winning next year." Forget about credibility, principle, honesty, all of that. It's all about who is most popular, most electable, and who can lie the best to make the American people think they will be good for them.

Some diehard neocons might vote for Billary..

Due to her pro-war attitude but I think it would be an agonizing decision for them. A "lesser of 2 evils" scenario. HA!

----------------------------------------------------------------
A small body of determined spirits fired by an unquenchable faith in their mission can alter the course of history.
~Mahatma Gandhi

2 Easy steps

2 Easy Steps for the Republican party to Save the Country, Defeat Hillary and look good doing it:

1) Have everyone imagine 9/11 happened on Al Gore's watch.
How would conservatives have reacted to the Patriot Act, Nation Building, etc?

2) Admit that the neo-conservative movement's recent popularity is just a creation that thrives on our fears, not our dreams, and has nothing to do with conservatism.

That's all folks....

-----
"We knew Ron Paul had a lot of supporters, but we had no idea that ALL of them would vote" - last known words from the MSM

yes, those are 2 very smart steps!!

I'm ProspectorSam and I approved this message.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Get active NOW to put Ron in the general election. ronpaul.meetup.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
What is begun in anger, ends in shame.

Thanks, Jane, for this clip...

Never know where my RP fix is going to come from. But I trust I'll find it in time. :-) I am so obsessed, I cannot see how anyone could even consider for a second a better President for America than Ron Paul. I'm hopelessly devoted to him... just like I know you are and most people here are as well. This has to be our time!

*

SD

Steve...

What frosts me is that we have to continually keep people on track and deflect these wacky Gravel/Kucinich/Unity '08 infiltrators from poisoning the discourse.

It's bad enough that ignorant Republicans think Ron is a 'liberal' already for failure to do their homework on him, we don't need them to think we associate him with that element. He doesn't ( he told me himself in February -- I mean the Unity '08 people are HOLLYWOOD ACTORS and blatant liberals/globalists/socialists) so I wish his supporters would just quit it.

Grrrrrr!

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers

I have to say...

...the MSM TV media (CNN, FOX, ABC) have done such a good job at respecting this money haul that I'm not even bothered by the CBS 'Fruitcake' author (Kevin Drum) nor this neocon buttkisser on the Weekly Standard who claims that Paul is still fringe of the 'don't tase me bro' candidate.

I didn't used to advocate this but, hey, they started it!

Have at him!

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/00...

Jane Aitken, 35-Year Veteran Teacher
Ron Paul 2008 Consultant
GOP Woman of the Year 2009
Founder NH Tea Party Coalition (NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY FAKE 2009 GROUP)
Founder USPEINetwork @ Yahoo (Nat'l Edu Activism Group)
Board Coalition of NH Taxpayers