Home » Forums » Daily Paul Liberty Forum

When is Dr. Paul going to

Submitted by anonymusvoice on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:03
in
0 votes

endorse a candidate? At least tell us who he's going vote for. That person is going to win the election or at least get my vote. I'm thinking Chuck Baldwin. Is this the guy or would Cynthia McKinney be it. It sounds like Bob Barr and Ralph Nader are out. Will he not tell us?

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dr. Paul is not going to endorse a Presidential candidate

Submitted by BigT on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:39.

publicly.

I thought this was quite clear already.

Dr. Paul is not endorsing McCain, and if he publicly endorses any candidate from any other party, he will lose his committee rankings that we need him to retain in Congress.

Plain and simple.
No public endorsement is forthcoming.

It should not matter, we

Submitted by Republicae on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:33.

It should not matter, we know the principles Dr. Paul supports, we know his positions.

“Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The people like those best who fool them most by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles”—Admiral Raphael Semmes.

—

http://militantjeffersonian.com

"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes

personally

Submitted by JohnGalt300 on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:22.

Fortune Favors the Bold

I'm not in love with any of them

—

Fortune Favors the Bold

I'll help you with

Submitted by bigsurjune on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:15.

I'll help you with this.

Wait until November 4th, go to the voting booth, look for the 3rd party choices, close your eyes and pick. It really doesn't matter because the masses are going to vote for the 2 main puppets.

Remember, we couldn't get Ron Paul elected and we're not going to get these other ones elected either.

The MAIN REASON to vote for 3rd party is to show a "NO CONFIDENCE VOTE." It doesn't matter who as long as it's not a write in and on the ballot.

VOTE NO CONFIDENCE ON NOVEMBER 4TH--SPREAD THE WORD.

And if Random Isn't Your Thing

Submitted by Prof de la Paz on Sun, 09/21/2008 - 11:50.

May I suggest...

If you live in Oklahoma, you have no choice. Write-in Ron Paul.

If you live in Montana or Louisiana, rejoice! You get to vote for Ron Paul!

If you live in New Hampshire, please vote for George Phillies (the other Libertarian).

If you live in Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, The Dakotas, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, or Wyoming, please vote for Chuck Baldwin.

If you live in Arizona, California, The District of Columbia, or Maine, you have my condolences. You may as well vote for Cynthia McKinney or Bob Barr.

If you live in Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, or Texas, you have my deepest condolences. You’re stuck with Ralph Nader or Bob Barr. Sorry.

If you can’t abide my recommendations, then, your State permitting, you could write in Ron Paul, your mom, your dog, or even Bob Barr.

But never Never NEVER vote for McBama!

This decision is rather painful for me, as it will be the first Presidential election for me (since 1976) in which I will not be voting for the Libertarian. It looks as though the Barr Campaign has burned that bridge, and it likely won’t be rebuilt until at least 2010. But still I reach out, optimistic sentimental sap that I am, and hope Barr does well in Georgia and Texas.

The Freedom Formula: Au + Ag + Cu + Pb

—

LXXI BC: Ego sum Spartacus // MDCCCLVII: I am Dred Scott // MCMVL: Ich bin Anne Frank // MMX: Je suis Assange // MMXI: Ik ben von NotHaus