SO MUCH FOR THE PICKENS PLAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 votes

I long had no particular views on wind farms one way or the other. But six years ago, when I first seriously looked at what they actually contribute to our energy needs and our environment, I had a profound shock. It was clear that the craze for wind energy had become one of the greatest self-deceptions of our time.
Far from being “free”, wind is one of the most expensive ways of generating electricity yet devised. Without an almost 100 per cent subsidy, unwittingly paid by all of us through our electricity bills, no one would dream of building giant wind turbines in Britain, because their cost is not remotely competitive.
Turbines are hopelessly ineffectual. The amount of electricity they deliver is derisory. The total power generated by all the 2,300 turbines so far built in Britain — covering hundreds of square miles of countryside and sea — averages just over 600 megawatts in a year, less than that contributed by a single medium-size conventional power station.
Most serious of all, however, is the fact that wind energy is hopelessly unreliable, for the simple reason that wind speeds are not only constantly changing but wholly unpredictable. One minute a turbine may be whizzing round, generating at full capacity; the next the wind drops and the turbine is contributing only a fraction of its capacity or nothing at all.
To keep electricity supplies going, the grid must have permanently available alternative conventional power sources equivalent to the maximum capacity of the wind turbines, ready to step in when the wind stops. This in itself is hugely inefficient, adding greatly to costs and, as they have discovered on the Continent, threatening to destabilise the grid or bring it to a halt when wind speeds change dramatically.
The best-kept secret of the wind industry, however, which continues to fool both politicians and the media, is its trick of referring only to the contribution of windmills in terms of their “installed capacity”, as if that is what they will actually deliver. They talk about a “16 megawatt” wind farm “powering x thousand homes” as if that is the contribution it will make to our electricity needs. Yet in reality, thanks to the intermittency of the wind, a turbine will on average produce through the year only a quarter of its capacity.
The success of this deception means that politicians almost invariably exaggerate the potential benefits of wind power by a factor of four. And of course the other great trick is to conceal the fact that all this must be paid for by that huge hidden subsidy.
The real danger of the “great wind scam” is that it takes the eyes of politicians off the real energy crisis fast approaching us, so that we are not building the proper power stations we need to keep our lights on. That is why it will one day be looked back on as having been one of the most incomprehensible blunders of our age.

click here for article http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/2910741/...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Don't believe it

I don't know where this guy's coming from, the coal or nuclear industry perhaps. It doesn't really matter. Rocky Mountain Institute (rmidotorg) did a study on the problem of reliability. If the wind turbines are spread out and combined with solar the system becomes more reliable than central power units.

Not to mention that micropower got $71 billion of private investment capital in 2007, nuclear got zero. Wind is growing much faster than coal. The market has spoken.

Do what you want, but I'm going wind and solar on my farm.

Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

Vertical Axis Wind Turbines far surpass these turbines that have become popular--the ones about which this article is written. They have lower start up speed, produce more power per weight, have lower operating cost as the generator can be placed on the ground, and they can take winds up to 100+ mph, they are also much quieter and many do not represent a threat to birds because they are much more visible than the big bladed types. The free market is working, but it is unfortunately not a true free market. Solar technology is improving at a rapid pace, and within 5 years could be cheaper per watt than coal. Efficient energy storage mechanisms are also being developed so that excess energy can be stored and released during times of lower windspeed or less solar radiation.

I'm not an environmentalist--at least not the Al Gore kind who would use governmental force--but it makes no sense to destroy beautiful mountains for coal with mountain top removal when there are other alternatives that will soon be cheaper.

If more people desire freedom from the grid, and choose to buy, or build, their own small wind turbines, and prices come down, that too would be a boon to the energy sector as they wouldn't be faltering with the ever-increasing demands placed on power plants.