A solution to this mess, send to congress and DIGG.
There does not seem to be any way we are going to avoid shelling out a major amount of money to save banks from the unregulated greed of bankers. Dean Baker and Doug Henwood and every person with any economic expertise whom I find credible predicts disaster if we don't.
But, as Baker pointed out on Democracy Now! this morning, the bailout can punish those responsible rather than rewarding them. It can also be done without creating new dictatorial powers for the executive branch of our government.
Congress must reject Paulson's Plunder and enact a plan with these progressive principles from the Backbone Campaign:
A. The people who caused the problem or profited most should pay for it
1. Highly compensated executives total compensation should be capped or taxed heavily as a condition for being bailed out.
2. Tobin tax on all transactions in Finance, Insurance and Real Estate including currency transactions.
3. Government takes an equity stake, proportionate to the size of the bailout
4. Tax hedge fund managers' income
5. Accountability - fire executives of failed companies as done in the UK, and abrogate their severance packages.
6. Impose a five-year, 10 percent surtax on income over $1 million a year for couples and over $500,000 for single taxpayers.
B. Re-regulate to prevent this from happening again
1. Direct the Federal Reserve to intervene to prevent asset bubbles.
2. Extend reserve requirements to new security categories
3. Regulate the packaging of loans so they can be evaluated, rated, and priced rationally.
4. Regulate hedge funds and private equity funds in a way comparable to banks
C. Include Main Street in the bailout and invest in a new productive economy
1. Establish a moratorium on foreclosures, renegotiating mortgages or institute a rent-to-own plan to keep people in homes.
2. Create a major economic recovery package which puts Americans to work at decent wages, in productive jobs that add value to homes and communities.
3. Invest the taxes on speculation, executive compensation, and the surtax on the wealthy in clean energy, infrastructure, education, and health care.
You can send this proposal to Congress by clicking here:





















the plan
this is the solution.
1 gov takes control of the mortgages (they already own the land eminent domain)
2 uses these interest bearing notes to back our new dollar
3 fires the federal reserve and goes back to dollars backed by hard assets
4 eliminates the deficit and no longer borrows at interest instead makes interest on it's money from the interest paid on mortgage notes.
5 built in checks and balances would effect home prices on congress spending.
i think this is a good plan that deals w/ where we are now and this turns a negative into our primary goal of sound money . people please respond i think this is sound.
graduated tax on these guys
THIS plan also would start us on the right road to taxation reform....?...You do not want to tax companies you want to tax profits, that go to individuals....That is if you must keep an income tax....at all...
This could be construed as a graduated Income tax, BUT I much rather prefer a goods tax....THIS could be a turn for the better though..... Till we can get back to the intentions & principles of proper taxation....
says
what do you want miracles ?
This outline is based on the real "insanity"
~Mikael / Peace, love, Light and unity ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
Regulation & good GOV'T do not need each other
SOUNDs like a plan. Except for re-regulation. GET out of the LOAN SHARKING business & you don't need to regulate .,...REGULATION is OVERHEAD, which a good GOV'T does not need...
says
I've read this over a few
I've read this over a few times. Each time I end up thinking the same thing:
1. More taxes
2. More regulation
3. More socialism
I don't really like it all that much.
I much prefer Newt Gingrich's plan: http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.28657/pub_d...
Although, I'm still all ears for something even better than that.
...
If you think about it from the rich mans perspective
They would hate these conditions . It's oversight. socialism ? Maybe I've spent too much time in Canada.
~Mikael / Peace, love, Light and unity ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
I'm anything but rich, maybe
I'm anything but rich, maybe someday - but certainly not now. You're probably right that rich people would hate that plan.
More government is not the solution. Government getting in the way everywhere we turn is the problem.
What we want and what we need is to get big government off our backs.
Oversight is just another way of saying regulation. It's the same thing. Government should enforce contracts but allow people and companies to make mistakes.
So now we have 799 companies that cannot be short sold. How is that not regulation? It should actually be called manipulation. If short selling is so bad that is should be deemed illegal, it should be illegal across the board - not only for 799 companies.
You question my pointing out socialism. It's in part C of the plan you posted. Making the rest of us pay for those who made bad choices is socialism. It's not fair. I didn't buy a house during the boom because I couldn't afford one. So where is my bailout? Don't bother looking for it, because I would refuse it.
To top it all off, the plan you posted suggests capping the incomes of the highest earning workers and putting minimums in place for the lowest earning workers. What is that? Communism? I don't know, but it doesn't sound good.
...
noone liked this ? i thought it was genious!
~Mikael / Peace, love, Light and unity ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !