Response to Senator Mel Martinez of Florida on His Reply to My Letter
I had posted my letter to my two florida Senators, Mel Martinez and Bill Nelson, as well as my representative Adam Putnam, in the Forums. I received a response from Senator Martinez, with an attachment containing his remarks to the floor during the congressional hearings on the bailout proposal. I am posting my correspondence with the Senator below. By scrolling down, you will see the communication back and forth, with my original e-mail to him at the bottom. I am awaiting replies from my other Senator Bill Nelson and Rep. Adam Putnam.
E-mail of 9/25/08 from Tom Mullen to Senator Martinez
Dear Senator Martinez,
I am in receipt of your reply via e-mail to my correspondence of September 23, 2008. I appreciate you taking the time to address my concerns, but again I am not satisfied with the answers that you have given me. Your letter states that you are “working hard to ensure that your tax dollars will not be wasted on any plan that rewards irresponsible or illegal activities by investment bankers on Wall Street.”
Whether or not the irresponsible are rewarded or punished is irrelevant.
Your comments during the Congressional hearing include,
“Congress should consider limiting executive compensation in any package we discuss…Congress will have to engage in active oversight of Treasury as they implement whatever plan we approve. So there should be no blank check. There will be no blank check.”
Senator, I have to assume that you are deliberately trying to obfuscate the issue, or that you have a pitiable lack of understanding about the principles that our country was founded upon. Our Declaration of Independence states that each person is “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.” These are INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. They are not subject to revocation by government, not even by majority vote. That is why our founders gave us a constitutional republic, instead of a democracy.
The most important of these rights, Senator, are property rights – the right to the fruit of one’s labor. In the words of Thomas Jefferson,
“To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father's has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association--'the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.”
As should be quite obvious to you, Jefferson’s words apply directly to the situation before us today. It is not a matter that there be “no blank check.” There should be NO CHECK WHATSOEVER. This is not a question of what is “best for the economy.” The crux of the matter is that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to forcibly take money from me and use it to buy up a financial institution’s bad debt, or to provide assistance to a distressed borrower. The federal government does not have the right to seize my property, even if it believes doing so will be better for the majority of its citizens (which this bailout won’t be anyway).
Therefore, Senator, I have one question that I request a direct answer to. Do you recognize my UNALIENABLE right to the fruits of my labor, or do you believe that your elected status allows you to revoke this right? I will await your response.
Sincerely,
Tom Mullen
E-mail of 9/25/08 from Senator Martinez to Tom Mullen
Dear Mr. Mullen:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the financial crisis facing our country. I appreciate you contacting me regarding this important issue.
I have heard from thousands of Floridians in recent days who are worried about this financial crisis and are concerned about the actions that Congress and the Administration may take in addressing it. I believe that our country is facing a very serious situation, and I share many Floridians’ concerns about the economic consequences to our country if we fail to act appropriately. We need to enact legislation that enables our economy to continue functioning while imposing new regulations and safeguards to ensure that this situation never occurs again.
The exact form that this legislation will take is not yet decided, but I assure you that I am working hard to ensure that your tax dollars will not be wasted on any plan that rewards irresponsible or illegal activities by investment bankers on Wall Street. There must be accountability in any plan approved, and those who have given rise to this crisis need to be investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law for any wrong-doing that occurred.
I am enclosing a copy of remarks I made on the floor of the Senate regarding the current crisis and its origins in the housing market. I believe that this problem is far too complex and serious to be handled in the same ultra-partisan fashion that has unfortunately characterized much of the 110th Congress. I assure you that I am committed to working with all of my colleagues to address this crisis and enact meaningful reforms to protect homeowners and ensure the long-term economic prosperity of our country.
Again, thank you for contacting me regarding this important issue. If I may be of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Sincerely,
Mel Martinez
United States Senator
Financial Rescue Plan
Speech to the U.S. Senate
U.S. Senator Mel Martinez
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
This Congress is about to consider the most important legislation affecting our financial markets – certainly for a generation – possibly in our country’s history.
The American people must understand exactly what is at stake as we begin consideration.
What has happened is that the credit markets have quit functioning. Credit cards, car loans, home equity loans, home mortgages, business loans.
Business loans to keep large and small businesses operating have ceased to exist. The financial markets are not functioning putting in jeopardy our entire economy.
Without timely government intervention, the financial system as we know it will no longer exist.
This isn’t a Wall Street versus Main Street argument. This is about every American’s ability to pursue his or her American Dream. Without liquidity in the marketplace, financial transactions come to a halt – and that will create a complete collapse of the financial system.
So the need to act has become clear. Treasury Secretary Paulson has asked for the authority to purchase illiquid assets from financial institutions in an attempt to get the markets functioning again.
But with that authority, comes great responsibility and Congress has an obligation to the US taxpayer to ensure that any program is crafted and carried out with appropriate oversight.
Congress should consider limiting executive compensation in any package we discuss.
Congress will have to engage in active oversight of Treasury as they implement whatever plan we approve. So there should be no blank check. There will be no blank check.
Let me also mention I am pleased to learn of ongoing investigations into the activities of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Lehman Brothers. This is the worst financial crisis that our country has encountered in recent history and we owe it to taxpayers to get to the bottom of any wrong doing that occurred.
We need to prosecute any inappropriate behavior on the part of these companies to the fullest extent of the law. If we are going to have to fix this problem, those that created need to be held accountable.
After the dust clears, Congress cannot lose sight of one of the main reasons why we are so heavily encumbered by this crisis – why our financial system is so deeply troubled at this moment in time.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were huge contributors to the problem because of their thin capitalization, ever-expanding portfolios and risky practices.
They fueled and funneled the risky securities that Wall Street bought and sold and made lots of money while ignoring the systemic risk their moves posed to the financial system.
In 2003, when I was HUD secretary, I came before this Congress with Treasury Secretary Snow and warned of the loose regulation of the GSEs and the risk posed by their undercapitalization.
We asked Congress to create a world class regulator to properly provide oversight to these financial entities that had become so large that they had an implied government guarantee and they were deemed too big to fail.
In 2005, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie, “…continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road.”
We are now at the end of that road.
As we go forward, not only will Congress have to determine the future role of these entities, we need to take a very close look at the practices that brought us to this place.
Throughout all of this work, we cannot lose sight of the root cause of this financial debacle – the housing crisis.
Floridians are among the hardest hit in the nation.
Housing prices continue to fall; inventories continue to rise; and a growing number of homeowners are facing their own personal foreclosure crisis.
To find the bottom of the housing crisis, to stabilize prices, we need to act. Congress can approve home buying incentives. Congress can approve a tax credit for down payments. That would at least encourage people to enter the marketplace, would reduce housing inventories, and get the money flowing back into the market.
As Congress debates this package, let’s remember who we work for – the American taxpayer. Our priority should be making decisions that serve their best interest. No blank check. Strict oversight. Accountability. Taxpayer recourse.
It is in every American’s best interest that we act. I look forward to creating the right legislation that averts a financial crisis that will affect every American – a financial crisis perhaps bigger than the Great Depression.
It is a time for responsible leadership. It is not a time for an easy out or a pulpit for populist rhetoric. We need to rise to this moment – for the good of our country.
-END-
E-mail of 9/23/08 from Tom Mullen to Senator Martinez
Dear Senator Martinez,
I am writing to urge you to vote against the proposed "bail out" of lenders and borrowers proposed by Sec. Paulson and Chairman Bernanke. Again I find that my property is under attack by the very government that I pay to protect it. There is no moral or practical justification for passing this bill. Economically, it will only serve to postpone the inevitable adjustment in home prices and deleveraging of malinvestment that accompanies all inflationary bubbles.
More importantly, it amounts to armed theft of my property, a crime you are sworn to protect me against, not perpetrate. I have written in the past opposing the seizure of my property for the purposes of redistribution to someone else, and have been frustrated. You have one more chance to earn my consideration of a vote in your next election. Please do not let me down.
Sincerely,
Tom Mullen
Sent to:
Senator Bill Nelson of Florida
Senator Mel Martinez of Florida
Representative Adam Putnam of Florida, 12th District





















has anyone noticed..?
the similarity of all their responses...wonder if they were given a template of responses to email of calls...? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master... George Washington
Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master... George Washington
Please Post this on any site you can
For anyone that comes across this correspondence, please copy and paste it on any blog or website you have access to. I want this Senator's response called out in public. I encourage everyone to do the same with their letters to their "representatives" and the unsatisfactory responses. Then, call their office and tell them what you did. I clearly saw fear in the faces of a lot of them during the hearing on this bailout. Let them know this is the last heist they pull before having to go out and get a real job. THanks in advance. The Revolution is here.
Tom Mullen
Tom Mullen
author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America
I have the same 3 reps in C. District 12
Putnam sent me an email receipt Wed. night; Martinez sent me the same boiler plate & attachment. Still nothing from Nelson.
My only encouraging sight in all this is Putnam introducing John Boehner whenever the House Repub. conservatives have a group statement to make. They say he has the right seniority to potentially become the House minority leader in this coming election. I hope he read my message and will continue to push for taxpayer protection. This won't be the last bailout attempt I'm afraid.
He is for it...
irresponsible or not, the actions of these financial institutions will be rewarded by our tax dollars. I'd say come election time, do the best you can, Floridians to vote him out of office. He obviously does not understand anything about economics. He merely is swayed by his constituents to go along with it. Not a politician who will stick his neck out for us. His conviction is very weak. Remember him in the coming election. He needs to be voted out. His statement betrayed him. He is one of these politicians who would like to put more fuel in the fire.
"He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it." Confucius
"He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it." Confucius
Has anyone been able to get a personal response?
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Ron Paul's Convention Speech
Yes, I got a response, sempiternal
Here is mine:
Dear xxxxxx, ,
Thank you for contacting me about the banking industry and financial markets. It is good to hear from you.
The financial markets are facing a severe economic challenge. United States Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke continue to take steps to stabilize these markets. Secretary Paulson outlined a plan for the federal government to purchase bad mortgages and other illiquid assets currently clogging the financial system. Despite placing a tremendous amount of taxpayer money at risk, Secretary Paulson believes it will cost American families far less than allowing major financial institutions to fail.
I am very concerned about providing a $700 billion bailout to U.S. financial institutions. The staggering price tag of this proposal brings great risk to U.S. taxpayers.
As the Senate debates this proposal, I believe that any plan for government assistance must include proper accountability and oversight. The public has bestowed great trust in the federal government and that trust must not be violated. Taxpayers have worked hard for their money and deserve to have their tax dollars used wisely. It should not be the responsibility of the hardworking people of Wyoming to bailout individuals or companies who have made bad decisions.
So as a matter of principle, we must work to ensure the financial health and stability of our nation. We need to meet the economic challenges our nation is facing through responsible and deliberate decisions. While there is no question that this crisis requires timely action, it is critical for Congress to proceed cautiously. The lack of transparency and oversight which helped create the problems in the financial system must be fixed in any government proposal.
Please know that I share your concerns and I will do everything I can to ensure that the voice of Wyoming taxpayers is heard throughout this debate.
John Barrasso, M.D.
United States Senator
hmmm, sounds like a politician, doesn't he? assuring me that it is a bad idea, but it sounds like he may vote for it anyway. I am writing back to him today.
Ask him how he derives the right
They consistently frame the debate into "how best to do it" rather than "do we have a right to do this?" THEY DO NOT! TELL THEM THAT!
Tom Mullen
Tom Mullen
author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America
Well Said!
Martinez is such a tool...
Well said, on your part...
I'm tired of the form letter crap from Obomba myself. It's unresponsive government, also known as tyranny.
P.S. How lame is the old reliable standby of the "blame game"--it's the "Democrats" fault or it's the "Republicans" fault. It's such a God-awful sham.
----
Support H.R. 6594 to give 9/11 First Responders (heroes) the help that they need and deserve. Watch "Dust to Dust" and "Dust to Deceit" to learn about the ongoing 9/11 Holocaust.
----
"...a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -John F. Kennedy
Nice job Tom.
Martinez and Nelson are mine also. I have called twice. I would like to understand exactly what they do not understand about 80% of their constituents saying NO. The last I checked No meant NO. It apparently will come down to NO when Martinez is up for re-election also. I am watching Nelson carefully also.
lunch is on me bigmikedude- when and where
Florida needs a better meetup system. We can invite Tom too. Just respond by region, I am North/Central area.
left_the_herd northflorida
!!!Truth is treason in the EMPIRE OF LIES!!!
" Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of they day; but a series of oppresssions...pursued unalterably, through every change of ministers, too plainly proove delibrate, systematical plan of reducing us to slavery..."
Tho
huge bump
for Liberty!
http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/09/10/statement-to-ron-pa...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57925480@N00/2660779139/sizes/l/
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul
Excellent letter
i noticed that he refused to answer you question directly. however, from his response, his answer is obviously NO. he does not believe in your unalienable rights. he undoubtedly heard you loud and clear, though. you made him think and that made him uncomfortable. way to go!!
keep up the good work/pressure.
'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.
'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.
Reverse chronological ORder
ACtually, the letter at the top is my most recent reply to him, so he has not had a chance yet to answer the question. However, I think we all know what HIS reply would be.
Let's make them come out and say it, though. DO WE HAVE UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, OR DON'T WE?!!!!
Tom Mullen
Tom Mullen
author of A Return to Common Sense: Reawakening Liberty in the Inhabitants of America
Absolutely!
get them on record!
'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.
'Would you be free men or slaves?'
Restore the Republic.
Great letter!
Let's all write our reps and let them know this. I noticed that you wrote personally to him, and not just thru a mass emailing like DownsizeDC (which is a good thing, by the way), because they really listen more to the personal ones, and I believe it makes them take us more seriously.