Where does he stand?
Submitted by NeoConned on Fri, 09/26/2008 - 23:26
I was looking through some of Ron Paul's legislation and noticed something a bit odd.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d096:HR07955:@@@L&su...
HR7955
Title V: Domestic Relations
Prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds to any organization which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style.
What's the deal here? This seems out of place with what I believed to be Ron Paul's stance on homosexuality.
»
that's fair because its a
that's fair because its a form of discrimination. remember it'sUs and them boyz---
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."- JFK
Actually I have no problem with it.
Makes perfect sense.
The federal Govt has no more authority to say it IS or MUST be accepted than it does to say it IS NOT or MUST NOT be accepted. Bottom line The Feds have no authority in the matter.
This most likely looks one way because there was opposing legislation for the Feds to MAKE it accepted or un accepted ... arghhh
LOL... I have now confused myself .... you got the idea though
**edit : ahhh yes ... and the federal funds should be denied because the govt should not support Homosexuality no more than it should give monies to fight/stop homosexuality.
slowly I'm loosing my mind I swear... info overload ..... Pilot to Co-Pilot "I'm gonna take a nap... wake me up if something happens."
____ _____ _____ _____ ______ ______ _____ ___
“Revolutions never go backward.”
Wendell Phillips
≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make
violent revolution inevitable."
John F. Kennedy
Because he knows the whole organizational side of that issue
is an NWO Rockefeller foundation population control measure. Also Dr Paul would likely oppose federal funds to any organization.
Explore Orthodox Christianity
Well, even though that was
Well, even though that was in 1980, I believe this is consistent with his views relative to the Chuck Baldwin choice.
It's disappointing and not libertarian, but it did put him more firmly in the "Republican" camp of the time.
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore