0 votes

TEXAS: HUTCHISON.. I dont give a care what MY PEASANTs' WANT (UPDATED) with proposed letter

BOTH VOTES YES!!!

I'm a TRAITOR and I am VOTING """YES""" on this BILL. SCREW ALL OF YOU YAHOO's in TEXAS.. Go Ride a Freekin HORSE ... Ride it BACKWARDS with the HORN in your ARSH. It will make it easier when you get "SCREWED" by the Inflation, and After all the BIG WIGS get out of the market before it "CRASHES". Piss on you "PEASANTS" i (hutchison) am an "ELITIST"..

You HAVEN't even READ the NEW BILL you silly PEASANTs"....

Yeah well read it NOW you LYING B-tch.... VIRTUALLY NO DIFFERENT:

http://www.govtrack.us/special/econstimbill/changes.xpd?id=4

Comments Please!
Senator Hutchison & Cornyn,

I am writing this letter to both of you after hearing you, Mrs. Hutchison, on the floor and after reading your letter, Mr. Cornyn, that you sent another constituent in my Republic. You have both ignored the people that you represent in the Senate. I am absolutely positive that you both received well over 50,000 email and calls. I am also absolutely sure that over 80% of these contacts were to vote “NO”. To vote “NO” was the peoples “vote”.
I heard Mrs. Fienstien. She said that you are elected every 6 years so that you can make the hard decisions. I beg to differ. You are elected every 6 years to ensure the” WILL” of the people without fear of being “RECALLED” for a longer period. Another item this “mis-Representative” said was that this was a “Democracy”. Obviously, after the vote tonight, it is. I say this because in a “Democracy” the people elect representatives to go and make the decision that the Representative feels is right. Well this “mis-Representative” is incorrect. This countries form of government is a “CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC”. In a Constitutional Republic, the representative “REPRESENT” the people that elected them. The representative “VOTES” the way the people want them to vote, not they way the representative feels is best.
Seeing that you both have elected to “VIOLATE” your “Representation” of the people, your are in violation of our trust. Additionally, seeing that you have both elected to “VIOLATE” that “trust” you are no longer worthy of “representation” of the people in our Republic. Furthermore, you have “VIOLATED” your oath to the “Constitution”. This is the very Constitution that the Senate Web-Site says you are “CELEBRATING”. You see, your oath was to protect and defend the “Constitution”. In so doing, you protect the “People” of this soon to be “once Great Nation” . Not following the Constitution thereby harms the people you are ordered to protect.
I charge both of you with the willful dereliction of duty by violation of your oath. I charge you with intentionally colluding with corporations and businesses whose clear intention is to themselves and not the people of this country. These heads of businesses are termed “Foreign and DOMEST IC ENEMIES” . By their willful deception of their customers, “THEY” defrauded them. Now “YOU” in collusion with them are about to defraud your constituents due to your vote. What does that make “BOTH” of you?
I will do everything in my power to ensure that YOU, Mr. Cornyn, are not re-elected to office. Mrs. Hutchison, I will do everything in my power to have you “RECALLED” from the office of the Senate well before your scheduled date of re-election in 2012.

As a 26 year Republican I am disgusted with the way you voted and I will not forget what you Senators are attempting to do to this country. GOD willing, the CONGRESS will stop you. I will do my part to ensure you will no longer ever represent anyone for the remainder of your natural life. President Jefferson had a name for what you both did. You figure out what that word is.

Copy and PASTE any changes below..PLEASE!!



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

IMO

What I did was use my senators response letter to me with the appropriate changes to show what policies he should be supporting.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/65802#comment-693765

AAAHHH Yes sweet Ms Hutchison

She's a lame duck from what I understand she is supposed to retire or resign or something. Too bad it didn't happen before this debacle.
She and Cornyn are Bush kissers from the get-go, Nazi Hitler backing
Prescott Bush and all. PURE D GARBAGE...My Congressman Micheal McCaul Repub District 10 Texas surprised me with a no vote in the Congress. I'm wondering what he has planned for a revote. This never should have gone to the Senate it never passed the house. Constitutionally the House can take a pass because it's dead I don't know what this was in the senate.

Just one last kick in the nuts, then a final deathblow

SENATOR LETTER.. COMMENTS PLEASE

Please add more comments on grammar, context, flow, transitions, spelling etc.....

Tim
GOLD

Yeup , Already a member..

Yeup , Already a member.. Thanks for the post though..

Tim
GOLD

The title of my email to kay was

"traitor"

it went down hill from there.

--------------------------------
"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."
----------------------------

HAHHAHAAAA... I hear ya, it

HAHHAHAAAA... I hear ya, it took a hell of alot for me to remain as calm as I could even though I lost about 500 neurons..

Tim
GOLD

I will "do" my part.... What you are attempting to "do"...

DUE would mean what is owed or as the result of.... DO would represent the action. So "due to your vote" i.e. "as a result of" your vote is correct. But I will "due" my part should be ... I will DO my part (as in I will act).

Hope that helps. GREAT letter. I especially enjoyed that you are going to trying to make sure they will never represent anyone "for the remainder of their natural life". Nice touch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6pAcBXt2j8
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world."

Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."

Viva La Revolucion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs

More like the remainder of their

UNNATURAL life...I am so angry right now...

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!

Is that correction above

Is that correction above correct? and TY Very MUCH... I'm suprized I didnt catch that... Heated while I was typing..

Tim
GOLD

hehehehee.. Thank You very

hehehehee.. Thank You very Much AGAIN..

Tim
GOLD

Looks good honorgod

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6pAcBXt2j8
"Not armies, not nations, have advanced the race; but here and there, in the course of ages, an individual has stood up and cast his shadow over the world."

Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever."

Viva La Revolucion!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmaTNf4YhEs

Thank Yoou ELVIEJO Tim GOLD

Thank Yoou ELVIEJO

Tim
GOLD

I don't have a problem with

I don't have a problem with members of congress (either house) voting contrary to the will of their constituents. Mob rule is destructive. That is why we have a CONSTITUTION!!! And that is why elected officials take an oath to uphold the constitution!!!! Elected representatives should listen to their constituents, and vote for their best interests within the bounds of the CONSTITUTION!!!!!

That being said, when you ignore the constitution AND the voice of your constituents, you are a traitor and are obviously working for the interests of another party.

5% of people make things happen
10% of people watch things happen
85% say "What happened?"

Well, I didn't say "traitor"

Well, I didn't say "traitor" -as you did- in the letter. I am hoping that the turd that reads the letter will.... :o| but YES, you are CORRECT 100%

Tim
GOLD

Thats called pandering and

Thats called pandering and BLACKMALE folks

Tim
GOLD

TRAITORS.... I fear what

TRAITORS....

I fear what comes on the winds of the night, a Revolution doth brew in the Tempest on the horizon.

Tim
GOLD

I need help on the letter

I need help on the letter above..

Tim
GOLD

Cornyn and Hutchinson

are Senators of my state and both are voting yes.It shouldn't come a suprise to anyone.They are Senators,just look at the two handpicked CFR candidates for President (both Senators).I've tried contacting these Senators and my Representative for days.Yesterday I got a "because of the large amount of E-mails we have received we can't address your communication at this time."And to think I sent her a E-mail asking her if she really wanted to do something for the people of America and the economy,to come out in support of HR 2755 The Federal Reserve Abolition Act.

I'm Drafting the LETTER

I'm Drafting the LETTER against Cornyn and Hutchison

Tim
GOLD

She's not up for reelection until 2012

By then she knows her constiguents will have forgotten all about how she voted.

This is what all politicians bank on.

Why do you think all those people voted for McCain? They forgot all about his pushing for Immigration Reform. And that he co-sponsored that bill with Ted Kennedy.

Voters short memories are the life blood these politicians live on. Because they are all blood suckers

Well, Diane Feinstein

is proud of her for the work Hutchison has done on the bill...because it supports rail (right up our asses).

--------------------------------
"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."
----------------------------

ahhahahahaaaaa.... You mean

ahhahahahaaaaa.... You mean it support RAILING her Peasant Constituants up thier Arshes!!!

Tim
GOLD

LOOK at it

LOOK at it PEASANTs', you ignorant sheeple, I know what Im talking about, I'm the great CEASAR Hutchison. LOOK at the OLD ONE and the NEW ONE

http://www.govtrack.us/special/econstimbill/changes.xpd?id=4


Tim
GOLD

One of my Senators

She didn't surprise me really, she votes opposite of everything I write her about.

Four years left, but for those of us in Texas, LET THE BITC* KNOW HER YES VOTE ON THIS WILL COST HER DEARLY.

I've already called and written, but please, let her know she WILL pay for this.

I never had a hero as a child. I've never had a hero as an adult. At 45 years of age I finally have a hero, and his name is Ron Paul.

as soon as

her vote is recorded.

--------------------------------
"the only thing that keeps the banking system from failing is general ignorance about how the banking system works."
----------------------------

Here's that snippet from Jim Sinclair

HANKY PANKY PAULSON

Paulson’s impressive interest conflicts

The actions of Treasury Secretary Paulson since the first outbreak of the Financial Tsunami in August of 2007 have been directed with one apparent guiding aim—to save the obscene gains of his Wall Street and banking cronies. In the process he has taken steps which suggest more than a mild possible conflict of interest. Paulson, who had been chairman of Goldman Sachs from the time of the 1999 Glass-Steagall repeal to his appointment in 2006 as Treasury head, had been one of the most involved Wall Street players in the new securitization revolution of Greenspan. Naming him to head the Government agency now responsible for cleaning up the mess left by Wall Street greed and stupidity was tantamount to putting the wolf in charge of guarding the hen house as some see it.

Paulson showed where his interests lay. He is by law is the chairman of something called the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, the Government’s financial crisis management group that also includes Fed Chairman Bernanke, the Securities & Exchange Commission head, and the head of the Commodity Futures Exchange Commission (CFTC). That is the reason Paulson, the ex-Wall Street Goldman Sachs banker, is always the person announcing new emergency decisions since last August.

Two weeks ago, for example, Paulson announced the Government would make an unprecedented $85 billion nationalization rescue of an insurance group, AIG. True AIG is the world’s largest insurer and has a huge global involvement in financial markets.

AIG’s former Chairman, Hank Greenberg—a close friend of Henry Kissinger, a former Director of the New York Fed, former Vice Chairman of the elite New York Council on Foreign Relations and of David Rockefeller’s select Trilateral Commission, Trustee Emeritus of Rockefeller University—was for more than forty years Chairman of AIG. His AIG career ended in March 2005 when AIG's board forced Greenberg to resign from his post as Chairman and CEO under the shadow of criticism and legal action for cooking the books, in a prosecution brought by Eliot Spitzer, then Attorney General of New York State.

In mid September, in between other dramatic failures including Lehman Bros., and the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Paulson announced that the US Treasury, as agent for the United States Government, was to bailout the troubled AIG with a staggering $85 billion. The announcement came a day after Paulson announced the Government would let the 150-year old investment bank, Lehman Brothers, fail without Government aid. Why AIG and not Lehman?

What has since emerged are details of a meeting at the New York Federal Reserve bank chaired by Paulson, to discuss the risk of letting AIG fail. There was only one active Wall Street banker present at the meeting—Lloyd Blankfein, chairman of Paulson’s old firm, Goldman Sachs.

Blankfein later claimed he was present at the fateful meeting not to protect his firm’s interests but to ‘safeguard the entire financial system.’ His claim was put in doubt when it later emerged that Blankfein’s Goldman Sachs was AIG’s largest trading partner and stood to lose $20 billion in a bankruptcy of AIG. Were Goldman Sachs to go down with AIG, Secretary Paulson would have reportedly lost $700 million in Goldman Sachs stock options he had, an interesting fact.

That is a tiny glimpse into the man who crafted the largest bailout in US or world financial history some days ago, the failed TARP—Troubled Asset Relief Program—a proposed $700 billion financial stabilization scheme which, in Paulson’s original version would have allowed him or his Treasury successor to use $700 billion, with no oversight or accountability, to buy bad or worthless assets from financial institutions he deems worthy of help.

As respected economist, Nouriel Roubini pointed out, in almost every case of recent banking crises in which emergency action was needed to save the financial system, the most economical (to taxpayers) method was to have the Government, as in Sweden or Finland in the early 1990’s, nationalize the troubled banks, take over their management and assets, and inject public capital to recapitalize the banks to allow them to continue doing business, lending to normal clients. In the Swedish case, the Government held the assets, mostly real estate, for several years until the economy again improved at which point they could sell them onto the market and the banks could gradially buy the state ownership shares back into private hands. In the Swedish case the end cost to taxpayers was estimated to have been almost nil. The state never did as Paulson proposed, to buy the toxic waste of the banks, leaving them to get off free from their follies of securitization and speculation abuses.

Paulson’s plan, the one essentially rejected on September 29 by the House of Representatives, would have done nothing to recapitalize the troubled banks. That recapitalization could cost an added hundreds of billions on top of the $700 billion toxic waste disposal.

Serious conservative banker friends I know who went through the Scandinavian crisis of the 1990’s are scratching their head trying to imagine how crass the Paulson TARP scheme was. That crass and politically obvious bailout of Wall Street by the taxpayers, what some refer to as ‘Bankers’ Socialism—socialize the costs of failure onto the public, and privatize the profits to the bankers—is a major factor behind the defeat of the TARP compromise version.

But there is an added element. John McCain decided to boost his flagging Presidential campaign by trying to profile himself as a ‘political Maverick’ one who opposes the powerful Washington vested interests. He flew into Washington days before the TARP was to be approved by a panicked Congress and conspired with a handful of influential Republican Senate friends, including Banking Committee ranking member, Senator Shelby, to oppose the Paulson TARP. What emerged, with McCain’s backing, was a political power play that may well have brought the United States financial system to its knees, and McCain’s Presidential hopes with it.

Power and greed are the only visible juice

The thing that burns me the most is how she...

... just dismisses the calls of her constituents by saying "They saw the old plan. They don't understand how this new plan is good for them."

What an arrogant bitch!

I SAW BOTH BILLS

I SAW BOTH BILLS SIDE-BY-FREEKIN SIDE.. .There is virtually NO DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tim
GOLD