Nov. 10th Glenn Beck poll.
Submitted by Warthawg on Sat, 11/10/2007 - 18:39Which Presidential candidate do you feel is best suited to lead us to victory in Iraq? Vote at www.ktrb860.com
»
Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America
  |
User login
Daily Paul Features
Top Recent Topics
Newest & Top
New |
Top |
YouTubes |
Ron Paul 2012 |
|
|
★
|
★
Active Forum Topics
Recent Comments
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
DON"T encourage Beck by voting!
Memphis is right. Glenn Beck is an appalling knob. Don't give him traffic.
"What does conservatism today stand for? It stands for war. It stands for power. It stands for spying, jailing without trial, torture, counterfeiting without limit, and lying from morning to night."
Lew Rockwell
Mission Accomplished
We've already won. Saddam is dead, concerns about the WMDs (irrespective of whether there were ever justified in the first place) are gone.
Hence, there is no reason to subsidize the socialist Iraqi government [note, that the Iraqi government has nationalized its oil fields, has given the Iraqi Federation of Trade Unions (formed by the Iraqi Communist Party!) the _exclusive_ rights to unionize public sector workers, has socialized its health care and education sectors in its constitution (sic!) which doesn't even protect the property rights if you happen to be foreigner]. Supporting the Iraqi government is just like supporting Hugo Chavez socialistic Venezuelan government. Only that in the Constitution of Iraq there are also such nice little sentences like "Islam is the official religion of the state and is a basic source of legislation: (a) No law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam.", making its system an Islamic-socialism.
I don't see a single reason to support or subsidize the socialist governments anywhere - and staying there coupled with giving them a free ride (as they don't have to worry about providing military and police forces for themselves - and at their own cost!) is just that - why should the American Taxpayers pay for and why should the American Soldiers sacrifice their lives for what's an anathema to the American Values?
I always wonder about those supposedly identifying as the "right-wing" who support subsidizing the socialism in Iraq... why don't they just move to North Korea if they love spreading "democracy" (here, more precisely: un-American communism/socialism) so much?
Ignore this thread!
Do not go to this filth monger's web site. see below. this man is a carnival barker. he is filth. do not give him traffic.
Well, I wouldn't say victory...
Victory for us, maybe, since victory was impossible considering how vague and dynamic the mission has been in Iraq...
Last night...
I've been laid up this week and have been forced to watch more TV than I would usually care to, but last night on Glenn Beck, Duncan Hunter, who really is a very nice man, (I've met and talked with him many times) said that right now, 'everyone would like to be Ron Paul'. Beck just ignored that statement and kept on talking.
Wow! that is one hell of a
Wow! that is one hell of a statement from another presidential candidate. Was there anything else he said. I'm thinking he was probably referring to the money we raised.
Do not go to this filth
Do not go to this filth monger's web site. see below. this man is a carnival barker. he is filth. do not give him traffic.
DO NOT GO TO GLEN BECK's SITE
I hate to be crass, but f()ck glenn beck and all his polls. I know for a fact that the dailypaul gets much, much more traffic than beck's website. He's trying to use us to bump his ratings. Check out alexa.com as he has much less web support than either dailypaul and especially ronpaul2008.com Let Beck die the ratings death that he is destined to die. DO NOT GO TO HIS SITE.
He got a ratings bump a couple days ago when we all went over there to vote Tancredo because Paul wasn't on his list. Let's not even entertain his desire to keep this bump going. DO NOT GO TO HIS SITE. He is an extension of the filth in office now. Do not go to his site.
Shoot. Good point. I have
Shoot. Good point. I have already voted. Ohh well.
These polls are little AM talk radio stations from around the...
country.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
-- Mahatma Gandhi
A Republic, If You Can Keep It
I think this is a trick
I think this is a trick question. "Victory in Iraq?" Dr. Paul wants us out of there ASAP. Glenn Warmonger Beck wants "victory," whatever that is.
Victory for me is to get out.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
-- Mahatma Gandhi
A Republic, If You Can Keep It
Absolutely!
The fundamental flaw with the neocon argument is that they cannot define victory. They haven't even adequately defined the enemy.
one more poll
Ron Paul is currently losing this poll.
http://www.wvnn.com/dale.shtml
Dr. Paul 27% Rudy 21%
This time we will show him
There is a new Sheriff in town and he have two names. VOTE NOW and take Giuliano trasvesti out.
I don't think you can vote more than once nor should you?
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
-- Mahatma Gandhi
A Republic, If You Can Keep It
I suggest you never even
I suggest you never even attempt to vote more than once, unless someone accuses Paul supporters of doing so, in which case you might attempt it just to prove that in any properly-designed poll...you CAN'T.
We don't want to prove all the accusations to be true. While there will always be a certain percentage of supporters -- of any candidate -- who will circumvent online polls, I truly believe that most online Paul support is legit. That said, I do agree with their claims that we have a disproportionate online presence. That doesn't mean all Paul's support is online, it just means that the other candidates have unenthusiastic supporters. When you know your candidate is just more of the same, why bother voting in online polls? This is just an extension of why voter turnout is so low in America.
We are going to "spam" the polls on election day, too.
===Signature===
"Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests." --George Washington