I don't think any planes hit the WTC buildings on 9-11....

I think this topic is important so we can get the right diagnosis on past events and we can prevent future false flag operations, whether it be some nuke or bioterror event. We can alter the future if we remain vigilant against those parties that were involved in passed transgressions.

1) I don't believe an airplane can penetrate or melt into a building. The airplane is predominantly aluminum and if I recall a Boeing designer suggested it was like a 'flying beer can'. So how did it penetrate a concrete/steel building the way it was shown on TV? Using Newton's 3rd law of motion, when a aluminum airplane hits a steel building would it melt into the building?

You know what I think should have happened if there was a plane that hit the building? I figure the front end section would crumple like a car hitting a wall... because of the angle of impact the tail section of the plane would have swung around and the side of the plane would have smashed against the building and there would be an explosion, but no penetration. Missiles are compact and have special steel warheads for penetration. They are nothing like a 'flying beer can' airplane.

Here is a pic of what it should look like when aluminum hits steel:
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=1032

2) Where are the large plane parts... wing section, tail section.. big engines? Disintegrated? Swept away? I've seen pictures of a dinky object that may have been a turbojet of a missile, but no huge nacelle or turbojet pieces. I've also seen a few photos that I consider fake and planted.

3) If you're a truther, what is your theory on who controlled the plane? Remote control using Global Hawk tech? Way too risky. 'Truther' airline pilots with thousands hours of flight experience couldn't hit the WTC on a flight simulator? (and some people suggest that hijackers that couldn't even fly Cessnas could perform these maneuvers with pinpoint accuracy..) Despite advanced technology, it would be too difficult and risky to attempt to guide a plane into a building using remote control. Failure to hit the targets would be disastrous.

Here is a link to a thread that calls out Devin Clark as a possible Motion Animator for the 2nd Plane Hit:
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=2367

Here is a great How-To video from animator that duplicates the CNN fake:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNXmgF2yAEc

Here is a link to the real poweful video September Clues:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8045542387672451515

I guess seeing is NOT believing this day and age....

...and whatever you believe in regards to 9-11, we must be vigilant in keeping the MEDIA accountable... for those who do believe in this theory, we must expose those in the MEDIA that were involved and continue to monitor the actions of these individuals to prevent future false flag operations. Whether they were the animators or fake witnesses I think we must expose and monitor their actions.

... all right everyone.. you live, you die.. be free... be powerful...

**** Update ****

In regards to Newton's 3rd Law of Motion. It just states that for every action there must be an equal and opposite reaction. Hence the force the plane exerts on the building is equal and opposite to the force the building exerts on the plane.

From LibertyVote:
Flight 175 - Impossible Speed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY

From JennyD:
9-11 No Vortices - No real planes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ry8wHDn1_Z8

From another forum:
Jack Blood and Dylan Avery admit to TV fakery?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaECuQqrsw8

No-planer Warren Cuccurillo (former 'Duran Duran' guitarist) confirms on a phone call from Jeff Hill of http://www.pumpitout.com/ that Jack Blood and Dylan Avery admitted to him that the WTC crash videos are fake after they watched the new 'September Clues' at Warren's house. Avery later denied this.

CBS President warned about fake plane crashes in 2000.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2008/09/cbs-prez-warned-about-f...

Thank you everyone for your input.