0 votes

Sean Hannity meets Change!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4136237715510732789&...

Two people confront Sean and expose that the owner of FOX is doing fundraisers for Hillary




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Infowars?

ugh...sorry, lost me.

https://twitter.com/#!/hayek

oh well...

"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation."

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
woo hoo!

HA HA HA

I loved that It made my day. Did you see his eye's. He almost wet himself. Sean Blames everything on the liberals. Anyone who even says one thing liberal he bashes with everything he has. I look forward to hearing him bash rupert for being the great satan liberal supporter. "NOT!" He is a Tool. He can only say what he is told to say.

Sean Hannity is the definition of a "tool"!

I really feel sorry for my fellow Americans who really believe this chickenhawk is a "Great American"! He's the biggest useful idiot on the radio with the exception of Hush.

This will help fuel this peaceful revolution

Ahhhh more Fuel to the fire of freedom,the torch of liberty is being reignited ----Americans Unite to the cause of liberty and support Ron Paul.
A Constitution Revolution!!!!

Opresso De Liber
Life,Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness!
Conscious of Our Creator and Source of our Liberties.

Tactics? Really?

I agree with you in some good extent, but I think that this may be the wrong tact to take with a Hannity. People can only take so much of a divergence from their viewpoint before they just shut their minds and label the whole view as "crazy" or "loony". We know this isn't the case, but you have to bring people around slowly. How many people here took some time to be convinced of the value of a part of Dr. Paul's message? Sean Hannity is pretty well entrenched. I think that the right approach might be to pick a particular issue, say either Murdoch/Clinton connection, or Hannity's asymmetric opinions on the Iraq war vs the Balkan war. There's a youtube video of it, i'll find if you want. Point being, pose as someone not entirely opposed to his ideology, then bring up a pretty strong point. You might even get a response out of him.

one idea

Take a look at the Republican platform. Ron Paul's message is quite consistent with the Republican platform. It's a good place to start when establishing common ground.

From http://www.laramiecountyrepublicanparty.com/aboutus.html

I am a Republican because...

I BELIEVE the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.

I BELIEVE in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.

I BELIEVE free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.

I BELIEVE government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of the money they earn.

I BELIEVE the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.

I BELIEVE the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people.

I BELIEVE Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.

I BELIEVE Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.

FINALLY, I believe the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.

The difference is that Ron

The difference is that Ron Paul actually means what he says and has a 30-year record to prove it.

That stuff sounds good on paper, but the Republican Party *DOES NOT* represent those ideals. I know, I've been a registered Republican all my voting life and have watched it shift with the wind for years. If it *did* represent those stated ideals, I certainly wouldn't be supporting a long shot candidate like Paul; I'd be supporting the Republican Party's best chance of winning (whoever polls highest).

---Signature---

"We should have a strong president -- strong enough to resist the temptation of taking power that a president shouldn’t have." --Ron Paul

good psychology

this is exactly the right approach (i am a psychologist and do know something about this). do not antagonize but seek common ground. almost invariably there is some.

This is the kind of stuff

This is the kind of stuff people call conspicary ,however we know otherwise.You may remember that when murdoch bought Fox the FCC tried to stop it because he is Australiab.
So here we have a Austrialian owned company doing fund rasing for a Presidental canidate and calling hisnews:fair and balanced"while at the same time allowin Frank Luntz to pose as a reprter at the debats?These are the kinds of conspacries that dont make conspicary nuts look so nutty because they are becoming verifiable thanks to folks Like A.J. and Russo
Thanx for the link

"The strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep (own) and bear (carry) arms is ,as a last resort ,to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-Thomas Jefferson

Murdock/Hillary connection

Wow, what strange alliances. Thanks for reporting this and getting it out there.

Prepare & Share the Message of Freedom through Positive-Peaceful-Activism.

Sean Hannity is a demagogue.

That took muchos huevos grandes. Nice one, guys!

Hannity is a shameless propagandist, and what's frightening is that most of his viewers believe he's speaking the truth.

I can't stand Hannity

It drives me insane how popular this guy is. He's the "friendlier, more handsome" Rush L., but with a third of the brains. (And I'm not a huge fan of Rush at all.)

Sean H. is one of the weakest thinkers I have ever seen. I just cringe every time he decides to tell people what Catholicism is about.

I'll take someone who disagrees with me on everything, but is honestly open to looking at the world as it is and learning from reality, over a Sean H. who might agree with me on a few things, but only because his ideological/lock-step views happen to be right at times. (Like a broken clock is right twice a day...)