New Yorker: Hagel asending Mccain :Beware what falling tide leaves behind

As many republicans certainly know -in spite of whether they've admitted such to themselves- especially since [R-House] Dr. Paul raised 10,000 peaceful supporters in Minnesota across the river from the RNC, Juan Mccain treads slightly en route to his presidency. Odds are stacked against him, leading party sycophants jump ship weekly, core conservatives are yet to be convince; in all, Juan's weak strategy through the primaries [use friends to snowball support] isn't reverberating nationwide -nor far beyond the drones that voted for him during the primaries.

In all, Juan's constant evasion debate & discussion brought about underdeveloped policies & proposals. Regardless of the nomination, had Juan talked with all GOP contestants -Dr. Paul included- his foreign policy & economic oversight might not be as pathetic & lame. This is no colloquialism, it's literal. GOP operations have fallen out in Michigan [who knows where else], Mccain/Palin rallies consist of little substance, focused rather on fear-based campaigning, etc. Though with little more than a week remaining, Juan treads on by inciting isolationism [white-bred crowds plotting & shouting over fear & panic regarding Obama's "otherness"]; weak associations of deviant behaviour; selecting a VP who condescends intellect above 5th grade stamina; & a drowning attachment to mercantile enterprise. All these will certainly bring about his fall, as it should.

Yet, for it all... talking heads are already propping up the next politicos. It seems, for every attempt failed, contemporary thought through media only gains legitimacy by supporting junk -so long popular consumers bite. It's been said, no republican seat is safe this coming election [Nov.4/2k8], yet I know of one congressional district which no DNC campaign will bait, Texas' 14th. Apparently, DNC does not even compete in Texas' 14, Paul's congressional district, as his popularity runs a strong majority, as recent primaries proved: 70%. Yet, Mccain wanting for RNC cash, conspired to distract Dr Paul with a congressional primary during his presidential campaign -despite arrangements for automatic seating- forcing a competition within a waning party. Little but self-destruction, the RNC suggests neoconservatives are prepared to destroy their own in pursuit of self fulfillment; warning all that failing to tow the party line would result in sabotaged careers.

So, who does the establishment have rolled next in line post-Nov.4? Chuck Hagel has been presented strongly by the influential New Yorker, as has been Palin, by Cheney's gang no less. Obviously Romney/Giuliani/Huckabee still dream -in spite of being discredited by supporting race/sex-baiting Juan Mccain; but more importantly, the R3voLution needs philosophic leaders to rally around. Senators & Congress campaigns haven't been maneuvered well successfully, though other influential party seats have been gained, certainly a solid base to start. Come 2010, our R3voLution could strike a few seats under either establishment party. Remember, they're only teams in a game they've rigged. Independents are important, but change must ultimately come from within. As for Hagel, he is significant because of his reported stance:

On the Senate floor, he declared, “Actions in Iraq must come in the context of an American-led, multilateral approach to disarmament, not as the first case for a new American doctrine involving the preemptive use of force.” He also expressed fear about what he calls “the uncontrollables”[Dr. Paul's blowback!]—the unpredictable consequences of military action—and about America’s limited knowledge of the Middle East. “How many of us really know and understand Iraq, the country, the history, the people, and the role in the Arab world?” he asked. “The American people must be told of this long-term commitment, risk, and cost of this undertaking. We should not be seduced by the expectations of dancing in the streets.” In September, 2004, he called the situation in Iraq “beyond pitiful.”

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/03/081103fa_fact_...

Doesn't this sound a little like someone we know? Hagel voted for the war, so his rheological proclamations are weak... but sounded through the right tubes, citizen-voters may be duped into supporting this establishment politician. If nothing else, this ought to spur us to remain vigilant and constantly growing, otherwise, the RNC tide which falls out may leave behind unsavory company.

www.gobonium.blogspot.com