Did the Founding Fathers Betray the American People?
Submitted by declarationofre... on Tue, 11/11/2008 - 23:28
"Our constitutions purport to be established by 'the people,' and, in theory, 'all the people' consent to such government as the constitutions authorize. But this consent of 'the people' exists only in theory. It has no existence in fact. Government is in reality established by the few; and these few assume the consent of all the rest, without any such consent being actually given."
- Lysander Spooner - (1808-1887) Political theorist, activist, abolitionist
http://wespenre.blogspot.com/2008/09/did-founding-fathers-be...
»
Nope...
President Lincoln and the The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (Corp. USA) betrayed the American people...which the founding fathers had nothing to do with.
Wake up...
http://teamlaw.net/HistoryOutline.htm
Re-seat all original jurisdiction Republic State Governors and take your Country
back!!
http://teamlaw.net/Government/usmap.htm
"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iERLtsBIqDg
This is true, it took a few
This is true, it took a few intellectuals to found the nation. So what?
Ventura 2012
Good article.
Thanks for posting. I always liked Wes Penre's writing style. Illuminati News, along with Infowars were the first websites I stumbled upon when starting to research the NWO 4 years ago.
He makes some great points and I've often wondered the same thing. Most of the Founding Fathers were Masons. The question is, were they part of the outer club or inner club? Washington quit in his later years. We know most of history has been re-written and ours does glamorize and exalt these men. Thing is, the more you study history from various sources, you find out that historical figures, for the most part, were very different people than the way they are portayed in the textbooks.
Secret Societies and the REAL driving force behind the New World Order:
www.dailypaul.com/node/59200
Since we aren't living under
Since we aren't living under the Bill of Rights---nor in much of any other real sense living under constitutonal governance---the author's theory is nonsense.
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States
(No subject)
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."
The People
were represented by the various elected delegations sent forth from each state. The states gave birth to the nation by creating and ultimately passing the constitution along with the first ten ammendments. Many ammendments were proposed by the various delegations but ultimately it took ten to get the constitution ratified.
Since the nation was born of the various states it should be obvious that each member state was superior to the federal government in matters within its jurisdiction. In no way would states give up their soverienty to create an overbearing government. The revolution had just been fought to prevent such a monster.
Our founders were very careful in what they were doing. That's not to say that there weren't others there that had desires for power over all the states, but in no way did the constitution provide for that.
The war of northern agression commonly referred to as the civil war was devised to conquer the southern secessionist states so that they could be reigned over by the federal government.
Please get a copy of "The South was Right". It is an excellent read and truly explains the souths position. If you went to public school you never heard this version of history. Even if you live in the south.
Charlie Daniels is right. The Souths gonna do it again!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJFX3GZEB3s&feature=related
Some Did
Chief among them Alexander Hamilton, father of the National Bank.
He also wrote "No Treason"
He also wrote "No Treason" If I remember correctly. Google it. Interesting.
Thanks
"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy
"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."
yes, by the few. with
yes, by the few. with approval by the many.
if it's not tacitly approved then you can end up dead.
so even the few tread lightly when starting up a new government.
unless the few are actually many, and already have a power structure in place, with guns to back it up, and wealth...
I don't remember are founding father's having that....
Then yes i agree that the
Then yes i agree that the government was established by the few.
With an election the many elect the "few" to best govern.The problem is they choose the candidates,control the advertisement and have the many split on minor issues.
It's pretty ingenious in how they've done it.
A countries greatest treasure is it's people.
Without people there's no government.
Without government there's no people?
I'm not an anarchist
THE FEDERAL RESERVE - Americas OVERLORD
It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
— Samuel Adams
"A government of reason is better than one of force." --Thomas Jefferson to Richard Rush, 1820
Define "few"? THE FEDERAL
Define "few"?
THE FEDERAL RESERVE - Americas OVERLORD
It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
— Samuel Adams
"A government of reason is better than one of force." --Thomas Jefferson to Richard Rush, 1820