***Liberty For All?***

"Tyrannosaurus Rex has more wisdom than NWO. T-Rex could have eaten everything in sight and stepped on everything else . . . . but he did not . . . for the greater part, nature does not annihilate it's food source.
Lions hunt the outside and weak . . even fish allow the "fish ball" to swim away for another day. Something universally cosmic about all living things and creatures."
So you believe that animals and all life forms make a decision to only eat so much, as a way of preserving their food source? That is not true. 99.9% of all life that has ever existed is extinct. Life forms through evolution develop defensive techniques to aid their survival. Lions only hunt the outside and weak because it is an easier kill, therefore they expend less energy and is will not endanger themselves. It is much harder for lions to take down a big, strong animal running with other big, strong animals. There is a debate in the scientific community whether T-Rex was a predator or a scavenger. Most likely
it was both. T-Rex would eat everything it could. How do you know T-Rex made a decision not to kill or eat everything it could? Any proof to your claim? The reason T-Rex did not kill and eat everything was because it couldn't. The dinosaurs that were not eaten by the T-Rex had evolved defensive techniques, speed, body armor, horns, etc. T-Rex, or any other animal or life form for that matter, does not care if it's food source goes extinct. Prey animals produce much more offspring than predators, as a type of defensive technique so their species could not possibly be killed off by a predator species. Countless prey species have be eaten into extinction by predator species because they did not produce enough offspring. The prey species that are around today do produce enough, therefore they survived.
"The backlash for mismanagement of food source by industrialized farming is extreme poisoning to the very DNA of life, it's gentic heritage resulting in sterility."
Not exactly sure what you are trying to say here. What extreme poisoning to the very DNA of life, it's genetic heritage resulting in sterility are you talking about? Could you be more specific, give a few examples, explain more clearly.
"Choose to eat a plant-centered diet. Eat more organic, locally grown vegetables and grains, less meat, less dairy. Eat as close to vegetarian as you are comfortable with. Make the proper food and exercise choices and you wont be so sick, and can think more clearly and have more energy for this global movement."
What evidence do you have that eating a plant-centered diet will make you less prone to being sick, think more clearly or have more energy? Do you have any proof that eating meat will make you more sick, think less clearly or have less energy? There is some evidence that processed foods make people less healthy, physically and mentally, and have less energy, but meat(fish,beef,chicken,etc.) is not a processed food.
"Processed foods that may not be as healthy as fresh foods include:
canned foods with lots of sodium
white breads and pastas made with refined white flour, which are not as healthy as those made with whole grains
packaged high-calorie snack foods, like chips and cheese snacks
high-fat convenience foods, like cans of ravioli
frozen fish sticks and frozen dinners
packaged cakes and cookies
boxed meal mixes
sugary breakfast cereals
processed meats
Processed meats might be some of the worst of these foods. Eating these meats may increase your risk of colorectal, kidney and stomach cancer. Processed meats include hot dogs, bologna, sausage, ham and other packaged lunch meats."
http://nutrition.about.com/od/askyournutritionist/f/processe...

"And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”
This is a half truth. Humans would not have developed their large, complex brains without meat. Humans are omnivores. Humans did not develop agriculture until 10,000 years ago. Before that, they were hunter-gatherers.
http://www.beyondveg.com/billings-t/comp-anat/comp-anat-4a.s...

"Still, if humans developed genes to compensate for a meat-rich diet, why do so many now suffer from high cholesterol and vascular disease?
The answer is a lack of exercise and moderation, according to the researchers.
"This shift to a diet rich in meat and fat occurred at a time when the population was dominated by hunters and gatherers," said Finch, a USC University Professor and holder of the ARCO-William F. Kieschnick Chair in the Neurobiology of Aging.
"The level of physical activity among these human ancestors was much higher than most of us have ever known," he said. "Whether humans today, with our sedentary lifestyle, remain highly tolerant to meat eating remains an open question researchers are looking into."
Stanford, co-director of the university's Goodall Research Center, said that modern-day humans "tend to gorge ourselves with meat and fat."
"For example, our ancestors only ate bird eggs in the spring when they were available," he said. "Now we eat them year-round. They may have hunted one deer a season and eaten it over several months. We can go to the supermarket and buy as much meat as we want."
"I think we can learn a lesson from this," Stanford said. "Eating meat is fine, but in moderation and with a lot of exercise."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/03/040322081608.htm

but also about the degrading of the environment resulting from industrialized meat production. A global world based on meat production and not on "orchards" is disasterous. Hey, even eating meat one day in seven would mean a huge reduction in the consumption of meat.

this post is just to exchange ideas....about torture amongst them.

would we want Dick Cheney to experience this even though he is supposedly a human being...

http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/09/10/statement-to-ron-pa...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57925480@N00/2660779139/sizes/l/

"What can one expect from industrial mega-farming and subsidizing this, thing? Just because you take out the mega-farming will mishandling animals bred for human consumption go away? I seriously doubt it. Rather, it would just be channeled out to more smaller local farmers abusing animals bred for human consumption in more locations than ever."

If you're interested in why this is probably not true, read "Everything I want to do is Illegal" by Joel Salatin (very entertaining read), and Mad Cowboy, by Howard Lyman. There's a huge difference between mass production of meat for the masses (industrial "farming") and real farming.