Open Letter Dec. 1 & 3 in the Chicago Tribune
In the Chicago Tribune on the 1st and 3rd of December will be a ad placed by the WTP Foundation addressed to Barack Obama.
This is what it says.......
An Open Letter
to Barack Obama:
Are you a Natural Born
Citizen of the U.S.?
Are you legally eligible to
hold the Office of President?
We The People Foundation
For Constitutional Education, Inc.
www.WeThePeopleFoundation.org
2458 Ridge Road Queensbury, NY 12804
info@GiveMeLiberty.org
December 1, 2008
Mr. Barack Obama
Barack Obama Transition Office
Kluczynski Federal Building
230 So. Dearborn St.
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Dear Mr. Obama:
Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also
taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America,
I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the
Constitution.
Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding
the Office of President by the “natural born citizen” clause of the U.S.
Constitution. For instance:
• You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughly
discredited, computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a form
that lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed
Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of
attending physician and age of mother.
• Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were born
in Hawaii.
• Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya.
• Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birth
in Kenya.
• U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child born
in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19
years of age.
• In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S.
citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming
a naturalized Indonesian citizen.
You have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when
challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have
been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order
you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.
Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of
your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in
order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.
Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President
you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution.
You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence.
Should you assume the office as anyone but a bona fide natural born
citizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you
would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic
peace and stability of the Nation. For example:
• You would always be viewed by many Americans as a
poseur - a usurper .
• As a usurper , you would be unable to take the required “Oath or
Affirmation” on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or
false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the
Office of the President of the United States.
• You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support from
the People.
• The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remain
obedient to you.
• No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of
your proclamations, Executive Orders or directives, as such orders
would be legally void.
• Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.
• Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation because
it would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President.
• Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper , from the Office
of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos
including a potential for armed conflicts within the General
Government or among the States and the People to effect the
removal of such a usurper .
In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the
total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility,
I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a
Redress of this violation of the Constitution.
With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate
Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth
certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday,
December 5, 6 and 7, 2008.
In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to
the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 am on December 8, 2008,
marked for my attention:
• A certified copy of your original, signed “vault” birth certificate.
• Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in the
names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack
Dunham and Barry Dunham.
• A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.
• A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.
• Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College,
Columbia University and Harvard Law School.
• Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.
Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote
on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are
a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public
record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are
barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the
Constitution’s eligibility requirements.
All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary
evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility,
they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.
“In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled
if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent,
the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people
by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become
a law unto himself; it invites anarchy .” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438
Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Schulz
Chairman





















?
Didn't the Hawaiin attorney general declare Obama's birth in Hawaii already?
http://www.meetup.com/RP2012GrandJunctionCO
Sounds like a terrific
Sounds like a terrific waste of money. Have fun with it, because you'll only end up looking foolish.
................
Truther?
No, sir!
..................
"The main thing that I learned about conspiracy theory is that conspiracy theorists actually believe in a conspiracy because that is more comforting. The truth of the world is that it is chaotic..." —Alan Moore
My guess is
days before the Sureme Court renders any decision on this issue, there will be an "incident" that will deliberately absorb all the media's attention. The phony media will go into overdrive exaggerating with wall to wall coverage this incident.
The "We all need to pull together" message will be in hyper-drive. The Supreme Court will waffle, avoid, be elusive and outright deceive any truthful and open discussion(s).
The final ruling will be "the dynamics of the american family has evolved with global integration causing gray areas that are open to argumentation and concern about citizenship. The Supreme Court takes this issue into consideration, but the obligation to take into account the current health of the nation supercedes any perceived technicallities that arise from fields of political gamesmanship. The Supreme Court reserves the right to re-address this area as the state of affairs improves."
-that's my .02 cents
No one can predict how history will play out;
my guess is, it would be far better to show possible fraud after O's wild popularity has diminished -- as it will when he continues the same pro-war, pro-banker elite policies, imposing further violations of civil liberties, exactly as the Bush administration has.
Challenges now will be viewed by the majority who adore Obama as racist or reactionary.
If their Golden One is denied his throne, and his supporters denied their victory, they'll be even less likely than before to believe constitutional laws are beneficial.
With their dreams and hopes dashed but never shown to be mistaken,
they'll clamor for politicians with the same ideology as Obama to continue his policies and redress the "injustice" done to their cause.
A very negative reaction to constitutional law that thwarts such rabid popularity would make our work for freedom far more difficult than it already is.
If all of these efforts come to nothing......
and the truth is never revealed in this case, then I do not believe that our fundamental rights as described in the Constitutiton of limited government powers will survive. Citing the particular Amendment while we are lead out the door is my nightmare. We should not need to ask God for assistance when all of the words are already so clearly written in the Constitution. Having to pray for Devine intervention for such an essential issue as vetting a candidate is ridiculous and is a very bad sign that everything could be gone soon.
The Verdict
It will be intresting to say the least how the Supreme Court will handle all of this.I think it will show what kind of material they are made of.This has never before came up of a presumed elected President not being eligible to serve and how they choose to handle it will determine their worth.We stand here today with the principles of the Country on the line and our Constitution under fire.Any strike to remove Obama will more than likely result in turmoil in the streets,but it will be necessary to preserve the Republic.
i can't wait!:-)
i can't wait!:-)