Conspiracy Facts
There's some disagreement on what has been proven to be done by the New World Order and other sinister organizations. I invite anyone who has a conspiracy fact to post on this site and those who think they are merely conspiracy theory to try to debunk with their own facts. I won't post everything I know because I don't want to spend the next two weeks at my computer. I'll probably add to these facts as time permits.
Here are some of my Conspiracy Facts:
1) 9/11 was an Inside Job
Here's a videography:
Terrorstorm
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=terrorstorm&emb=0&aq=f#
9/11 truth rising
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=terrorstorm&emb=0&aq=f...
Fabled Enemies
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=terrorstorm&emb=0&aq=f...
2) Chemtrails are meant to hurt us
UK admits to spraying bacteria, cancer causing compound
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4398507,00....
Master article with alot of chemtrail information inside:
http://www.infowars.com/?p=4345&cp=12
3)Global warming is a farce
Refers to the documentary "the great global warming swindle"
http://www.infowars.com/articles/science/global_warming_grea...
Also read Michael Crichton's "State of Fear"
4) Population control is meant to kill us
Eugenicists quotes
http://www.infowars.com/?p=4348&cp=3
5) The elites dress up and perform ritual sacrifice
"Conspiracy of Silence"
http://video.google.com/videosearch?
q=conspiracy+of+silence&emb=0&aq=f#
"Bohemian Grove"
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=conspiracy+of+silence&...
2008 Bohemian grove guest list
http://www.infowars.com/?p=3500
6) Fluoride is a neurotoxin
One of many organizations exposing fluoride
http://www.fluoridealert.org/
Vaccines cause cancer and autism
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_247-248/ai_11...
http://www.infowars.com/articles/science/autism_none_for_unv...
7) Most of the NWO are into pedophilia and want no more than 500,000 people left on the earth
See "conspiracy of silence" above
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
Like I said this is a sparse list of facts, not theories. I could expound more on each of these topics- I just won't right now. And by no means are they an exhaustive list of things people think are merely theories. Things like HIV was engineered, HAARP, MKULTRA, Black Helicopters, and predictive programming are disputed as well. I invite everyone to dispute facts. Let's see who is civil and who isn't.
evil flourish
evil nn facts
evil only needs obediant ignorant slaves
/Mike
/Mike
Front Fell Off
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcU4t6zRAKg
I don't like Goldberg,
but here's another link that provides info for further research regarding Margaret Sanger and eugenics: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODUxZmVmZDM0ODY0MTFhOWJ...
This is for
The coincidence theorists who think that evil people don't work together.
_________________________
New World Order for Dummies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRLPG_HplrA
13 Bloodlines of The Illuminati
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/
The Biological Basis of Elitism and "The Divine Right" Rule
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_div...
Two-seed theory: The origins of the psychopathic elite
www.dailypaul.com/node/68954
Political Ponerology and Psychopaths
www.dailypaul.com/node/53506
The Secret Order of The Illuminati (good overview)
www.illuminati-news.com/moriah.htm
Secret Societies and the REAL driving force behind the New World Order
www.dailypaul.com/node/59200
Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.
http://www.amazon.com/Societies-Psychological-Warfare-Michae...
25 WAYS TO SUPPRESS THE TRUTH: The Rules of Disinformation
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/68785
HOW TO ANALYZE THE NEWS AND WHAT GOES ON AROUND YOU
http://www.joelskousen.com/hotissues_news.html
Also check out America's original "third party", The Anti-Masonic Party :
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/62031
America has never come closer to stopping them than it did over 160 years ago - and most Americans have never heard of it.
"If good government is to be restored all Masons must be purged from public office". - Rayback
HOW TO ANALYZE THE NEWS AND WHAT GOES ON AROUND YOU
Great link.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
Hey . . .
You won't get any arguments from me. I hear ya loud and clear.
Here's what some want us to do
1) Stop talking about the problems we're seeing.
2) AJ is a sensationalist who over hypes the problems
3) This is a fear tactic that just corrals more people into the fear
I agree with some of this. Whether AJ knows it or not his work does frighten alot of people and they get stuck in "analysis paralysis". I think it's important to be informed, but not let it dominate your life. I don't think AJ puts any lies on his show, but he does play up some sensationalism. I also think he's genuinely concerned.
Some have called for censorship, and I think that's the complete opposite of what we should be doing. One of the things that stops me from paralysing analysis is to get other people informed. So my vote is no to censorship and yes to solutions.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
fact...the media is controlled...including so called opposition
media."
(Jeff Rense/Jones just parrots all the scary stuff over and over again...whether they know it or not, they are helping "them")
This post is composed of so called facts that are designed to scare you.
They control us with fear.
All of this list is "scary."
It makes them look "big and powerful."
It makes us feel "weak and frightened and angry." (stay in the fear zone it si what THEY want)
It is a game. Stop posting it and believing it. It is how they control us.
Walk away from all of this clap...there is a tiny handful of men and their lackeys who control us with smoke and mirrors.
They are trying to scare us into giving them more power.
F the damn chemtrails for pete's sake! Talking about them is WHAT THEY WANT.
Stop helping them.
Tell the truth about our world and they will lose their power.
Their power is the lie that "they are all powerful." THEY ARE NOT.
Tell the truth and the lie will end.
Unify
logged in
just to bump it.
http://www.votenader.org/blog/2008/09/10/statement-to-ron-pa...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/57925480@N00/2660779139/sizes/l/
Website:
http://www.libertypoet.com/
Twitter:
http://twitter.com/LibertyPoet
"How can we justify to the unemployed and underemployed in the United States the incredible cost of maintaining a global empire?" - Dr. Ron Paul
Still no other facts
just windbaggery. Can't you conspiracy theorists find one news article to prove that 9/11 wasn't an inside job? or that chemtrails are there to help us?
Really, I'm just asking for someone to do something. Is that to much to ask, or do you just not get the concept of actually finding data then applying that to the real world situation? Is this too complicated a process for you all?
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
The "windbaggery" Sir, is on
The "windbaggery" Sir, is on your part. You provide us with little more than assumptions, no hard facts that can be proven, that is why your assumptions are called THEORIES!
I mean were you not pushing the Zeitgeist Movement very hard just a month or so ago? You have pushed that along with numerous CTs and yet you cannot provide a good reason for me to support your ZM, or believe the CTs you espouse with such fervor.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
show me one of your posts
that cites a news article. ANY news article that corroborates your crazy government-is-good-for-us conspiracy theory. I don't care if it was written on toilet paper by a mexican immigrant, just give me something that proves your point.
I've provided several dozen already by NATIONAL newspapers, government agencies and investigative journalists. You and the other windbags just go on and on about opinions, but no facts.
Keep on blowing hot air, you might be able to heat up your house.
You're NOW the guy calling for censorship of actual news. Yet you can't find any news articles that back up your opinion that this news is "theory". Don't you see censorship, especially when you can't even challenge people with facts, is what we're all fighting against? Are you on our team if you really want people to be censored?
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
Yes, you have provided
Yes, you have provided dozens of selections to support your CT, but none of them appear to actually prove your position or the theories you support. As I stated in my original threat questioning the reasons behind the flood of CTs on the DP, you and those who support these CTs will naturally resort to questioning the Patriotism or the loyalty of those who question your theories...indeed, you have fulfilled that "prophecy" very well.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
Are you a coincidence theorist
who thinks that evil people don't work together?
I think people are people
I think people are people and most are out to get as much as they can by doing whatever they can do, some are corrupt, some are dumb, some are not.
There are numerous unproven theories about so much that it is virtually impossible for it all to be verified unless a person totally dedicates himself to searching out every possible bit of evidence concerning a particular theory.
Each theory, can and often does have numerous aspects, some have several theories concerning one subject, such as 9/11. The question becomes how does one distinguish a fact from a fallacy in such matters if all are currently unprovable and remain theoretical in nature. At some point logic must predominate over supposition and mere conjecture about the various bits of information within a certain theory, if not then it will always remain nothing more than a theory without evidential conclusions.
There are many who hold to certain theories that fight among themselves as to the validity of particular parts of each other's theories; that should be an obvious sign to the logical mind that there is a substantial problem within the CT community itself regarding certain types of information. Take 9/11 again, which I consider the most important event of the last 50 years in regards to our country and the nature of our government, there are a multitude of variations within the conspiracy theory group as to what happened, how it happened, if this plane was a hologram or real. I mean the mental filters that must be employed just within each theory is enormous.
Some theories, especially as they appear on the web, contain so much material from so many sources that people seem to accept much of it without questioning the accuracy, some seem to simply invent material that has no connection with either reality or probability. There may well even be attempts by some to deliberately plant information or perhaps I should say disinformation, who knows who the authors of some of this information really are or how to distinguish evidential information, which is needed in these cases, with simply conjecture. There are a huge amount of discrepancies within various CTs, some contradicting others.
So, until evidence is provided, until factual information that can be verified is established then these theories will remain nothing more than theories no matter how much faith and belief a person might sincerely place in them.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
That's a funny statement
Those that don't supply any facts, but call for censorship are patriots? I could lump in Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly into that group. Do you really want to be the Hannity of the Daily paul?
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
I don't believe Hannity or
I don't believe Hannity or O'Reilly anymore than those you have grouped together...all entertainers and I could name dozens more. What kind of point are you trying so desperately to make?
Do you also believe that the moon landing was a hoax? I just want to gauge just how wrapped up in modern mythologies you really are?
Is Paul McCartney dead?
All those that believe those CTs think they have "proof"....what is the difference between them and you?
How bout Diebold, that CT certainly didn't work out well this election did it. McCain was sure to win according to that CT.
How about this one: David Icke's --BBC reporter-- claims that humanity is actually under the control of dinosauroid-like alien reptiles who must consume human blood to maintain their human appearance.
"Evidence" goes from Sumerian tablets describing the "Anunnaki" (which he translates as "those who from heaven to earth came"), to the serpent in the Biblical Garden of Eden, to child abuse, fluoridation, and the genealogical connections between the Bush family and the House of Windsor.
Icke theorizes that the reptilians came here from the constellation Draco. Like most conspiracy theories, falsification of Icke's hypotheses is nearly impossible, but Icke continues to sell books and give speaking engagements based on concepts ranging from the New Age to his political opinions.
I'll just bet you believe this one: Popular Arab news services claim the U.S. and Indian militaries deliberately caused the Indian Ocean tsunamis with electromagnetic pulse technology.
Another type of theory bases its claims on oil and gas interests. Others also reason that the technology is at least feasible if not highly probable since research into such technology has been conducted by the military as far back as World War II.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
You're really grasping for straws
Going for other theories and trying to link me with them won't help your straw men. Try to stick to the facts I've already presented and your case will have a better standing. Since you haven't tried anything besides grasping for straws I guess you don't have a fact to back up your theories.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
Not at all JS....I am simply
Not at all JS....I am simply stating the fact that all CTs have one thing in common, they are simply THEORIES, if you had facts they would cease to be THEORIES and could be proven. I am not trying to prove such THEORIES, you are and you have failed to provide facts because of the nature of your argument. By its very nature you cannot prove any THEORY because, by its nature, it is just that a THEORY.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
Your battalion of straw men
Can all be blown down. I've already built my house with facts. Your coincidence theories won't hold up without any citable facts. It's like lashing together straw with silly string.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
No, you have built a house
No, you have built a house of pieces of information that you consider factual. As I stated if you had facts then it would no longer be a theory and you would be a wealthy man from your discovery of those facts. You would, if they were indeed facts that could actually be verified, be able to blow the top off of these theories and expose those crimes. You cannot prosecute people for theories only for evidential facts. Until that time, once again, all you have is unverifiable information that makes up the bulk of the theories.
These are theories, theories no matter how much you believe them to be true can only stand as facts when they can be verified in conjuction with other facts that link them together to form an actual case.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
What will convince you?
Really cause that's all it boils down to. What evidence do you need? Do you want Prez Bush to sign a letter saying "Yes, I did it"? Are you really that naive? Provide some facts of your own before blowing wind.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
Now THAT is a "straw man" on Republicae.
When did he advocate bigger government? Try never.
http://www.mises.org/Books/mysteryofbanking.pdf
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.pdf
Fluoride anyone?
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=0he-LZNzVg0&feature=related
Watch out
Here's another fact:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/74554
He's openly calling for censorship of anyone who doesn't agree with him. Never did I say bigger government.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
No, I am asking for
No, I am asking for intelligent debate. If you notice, one person in particular never gives anything other than an opinion. So, if you are talking about Greed, you will find that I have asked, for months, something to back up his opinions, just as I am asking you for some factual information to back up your CTs. He has not provided any nor have you.
Far from being censorship, I am asking for information to support either an opinion or a theory. If you, and others cannot provide such information it is a weakness on your part, but it is not censorship. You however have sought to censor people, have you not, you were called out on that fact when your censorship appeared on your blog, in fact, you later apologized for such censorship. I would take care in the accusation of anyone censoring especially since it is you who seems to have the propensity toward censorship, not I.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
where's your facts?
Once again, missing. Show me something to prove your point of view, otherwise it's a one sided debate-and you're not winning.
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
http://killfiat.blogspot.com/
Not to be a turd in the
Not to be a turd in the punchbowl, but it's "where ARE your facts"...
You are the one who is
You are the one who is defending your position, it is you therefore that need to provide factual information, which you have not done. The fact is that I don't need to win, but you do, this is your contest, not mine.
Once again, if you are seeking to provide facts about a theory that will naturally be very difficult to do because at the point you do that then it no longer qualifies as a theory, but as a fact. When you do find proof on any of these theories then I would suspect you would find yourself a very famous and wealth man. At that point you win your own contest, until then all you have is conjecture.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes
Wow. You take words right
Wow. You take words right out of my mouth everytime.
We need more logic and reason on this board. Republicae and I disagree on alot of things, but at least we attempt to substantiate our claims.
Never did Republicae,
Never did Republicae, myself, or any other largely anti-CT posters on here say that the government was good. But our consensus on the fact that government sucks does not automatically validate your specific claims, especially when the facts simply arent there.
Folks, if you recall JS was
Folks, if you recall JS was the guy who espouses the Zeitgeist Movement. Additionally, if any of you recall visiting his Blog you will remember that at one point, although now removed, he sought to censor anyone that commented on his site that was critical of Zeitgeist.
I believe his words went something like this: If you post anything that criticizes the Zeitgeist Movement your comments will be deleted. I remember it was something like that, was it not JS?
Like many other sites, the CTers have CO-OPTed the DP.
http://www.1776solution.blogspot.com
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue. Barry Goldwater
http://militantjeffersonian.com
"Men do not willingly read unpalatable truths of themselves. The People like those best who fool them most, by pandering to their vices and flattering their foibles" Raphael Semmes