Galt's Gulch Exists! The NH Free State Project

I've always trusted my Dad on stuff like this since I woke up and looked around and he could really talk to me about the situation.

I didn't do that till around 30, so we've had some pretty amazing conversations since. He's got a better ideal than most of what is really going on... his friends and business associates are what we would call ~connected~.

He lives in Montana... ;)

Hardly. Obama won because, strange as it may seem, he was viewd as the better candidate. Who else could they have voted for? Nadar? Barr? I wrote in Dr. Paul but the average voter up hear truly doesn't know much about him.

Dull in NH means almost no crime, decent schools, polite drivers, good food, plenty of jobs, friendly neighbors. And people tend to mind their own business.

I don't know about Sununu, but please check the Tax Foundation's analysis for the real NH state and local tax situation. We must consider all of the taxes in a state to get to a bottom line.

New Hampshire's State/Local Tax Burden Among Nation's Lowest
In nearly every year of the past three decades, New Hampshire's state and local tax burden has ranked among the nation's lowest. Estimated at 7.6% of income, New Hampshire's state/local tax burden percentage ranks 46th highest in the nation, well below the national average of 9.7%
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/topic/43.html

How does your state measure up?
http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/topic/9.html

You can find the complete story over at http://freekeene.com. You'll have to scroll down quite a bit or type 'couch' into the search. But to save you the trouble, I'll just say that this thing has been over for at least a month now. Basically, the judge had intended to arrest Free Keene's Ian before the hearing even started in order to clamp down on those civil disobedient types. This is the video of the judge loosing his mind on camera when Ian didn't sit fast enough-- http://ridleyreport.com/video/2008/nov/nh_slow_sitting_arres.... Ian was originally given 3 contempt of court charges X 30 days/piece plus 3 days for refusing to pay the fine. In the end Ian only served 3 days... During those 3 days in jail, legions of activists were calling the judge's, prosecutor's and corrections office--kind of how the RP activists did whenever RP was snubbed on tv or online.

Fortune Favors the Bold

Because if we did, there's a number to call...

There is only ONE lawful way to restore the principles the USA was founded upon that I can think of - and if you can think of a better way, I'd like to hear it, because I see everything else as futile. I don't see the FSP changing any of the core problems. FSP wants 20,000 people to sway a vote? we could take over 20 counties and install 100% constitutional government/enforcement immediately with that number of people! what follows is a condensed post from freedom4um that is relevant to the discussion:

First, we must understand that the 'Civil' War didn't free slaves, it just made EVERYONE slaves of the federal government by creating federal subjects called "US citizens", which came from the Civil Rights Act of 1866, then amended into the Constitution in the 14th Amendment. Federal subjects have no 'rights', only 'priviledges'.

This, and the loss of _s_tate sovereignty (in the creation of federal political subdivision [municipal] overlays called _S_tates - eliminating all dejure _s_tate offices/officers/oaths/bonds) is at the core of turning everything upside down, turning everyone into subjects to the unaccountable federal government and it's corporate creations: States, agencies/agents/employees, etc. This is NOT government, though most people think of it as government.

These are merely hired guns, mercenaries just like Blackwater Inc., and they all operate under the color-of-office, color-of-authority, and color-of-law. The final nails in the coffin came when an unconstitutional 4th
branch of 'administrative government' was created under President Franklin Roosevelt which left the other 3 branches
(Executive/Legislative/Judicial) vacant.

There is NOTHING left of our Constitutional form of government (except Sheriffs and Notaries) and fighting within the fraud to stop the fraud is without any reasonable or practical sense. Waiting for them to come grab guns and die in a suicide-by-cop is also idiotic - there are an endless supply of people that will serve evil for $$$.

If everyone refused to EVER sign any contract whereby one admits to being a "US/federal citizen/subject", things would be pretty much right themselves, and all the fraud would fall apart, but that isn't going to happen. The masses of people will always prefer ignorance, dependency, and slavery to the responsibilities of freedom.

Thus, the only practical way to restore the principles of life,
liberty, and property is for a group of less than 1000 patriotic
and knowledgeable people to move and become residents of any one of the several dozen of counties in the USA that have less than 1000 in population. Loving County in Texas for example has only 300 people or so. This doesn't mean everyone must purchase property - it means to *reside* by any means necessary to vote in a
Constitutionally and lawfully aware Sheriff.

THEN: everyone votes in a patriotic and Constitutionally knowledgeable Sheriff - who can then KEEP OUT ALL GOVT *EMPLOYEES* - BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL OPERATING UNDER THE COLOR-OF-OFFICE/AUTHORITYLAW in their enforcements over "US citizens", and have NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY over a Sheriff or natural born citizens - people of the land. This will be 100% lawful, and the Sheriff can deputize the whole county to 'preserve the peace', which is his highest responsibility. The Sheriff is the HIGHEST Constitutional law enforcement authority in the land - no one can lawfully usurp his authority to enforce Constitutional law, and everyone in the county can lawfully support him with whatever force necessary.

ALL patriot groups could take part and would be needed - the Constitutional law scholars, the subsistence farmers, the unorganized militia that train and prepare, the activists/organizers and radio hosts, etc. Someone with a voice needs to motivate this into happening. Waiting to be reactive is stupid, futile, and a big waste of time; it is long past time to be PROACTIVE!

If we can just accomplish this with ONE COUNTY/500 people, it will begin to attract support and attention, and then there is a chance for other counties to follow.

Only by restoring *law* (as opposed to statutes/regulations/policy) and offices/officers/oaths/bonds and ridding ourselves of federal agencies/agents/employees and the associated dependency/servitude of 'US citizenship' can we achieve the founding principles of the USA. I see no other practical solution.

--

i have thought about this for years. i spent over 10 years fighting in courts and fighting pigs and withdrawing in every way from the beast system - and i am tired - i am not seeing enough people waking up - and i don't see any other way left.

if we can't even get 500 patriots together to take a county and stand for life, liberty, and property - then something is wrong. i have written many 'patriot' radio hosts and other leaders - and i get no response. everyone is such a coward - and it makes me sick. it is as if everyone is an 'op' whose job it is to keep people on their sofas, idle.

waiting to be reactive will accomplish NOTHING - how can anyone disagree? and what better way is there to be proactive?

right now - there are millions collecting ammo and guns - for what? right now - there are millions storing freeze-dried food - for what? so you are secure as your state and union are plundered and taken over? WTF kind of dumb-ass strategy is that?

then what do you do after your food runs out in 5-10 years? then what? are you going to be happy with what you are left with? i don't know where people's heads are.

i'll tell you what to do with your guns/ammo/food - get off your ass and sit on the Gulf Coast Beach in Loving County for a year eating your freeze-dried food so you are qualified to vote - and then vote in a Constitutionally aware Sheriff - someone with some $$$ can buy a big chunk of land and divide it up for farming/ranching, and then use your guns/ammo to keep govt *employees* out!

employees are NOT public officers, and they have NO AUTHORITY over anyone at all in any way. they are no different than employees of any other corporation, except the fact that they are engaged in a massive fraud of authority against Americans.

then we will have taken ONE SMALL STEP FOR FREEDOM, and ONE GIANT STEP FOR THE WORLD TO SEE! the world is waiting to see what we do. at the very least, it would be a historical event that would go down in the history books ...

the first turn in the tide of fascism/socialism/communism. the
first true stand for life/liberty/property/law/freedom.

of course - i do not think the 'agencies/employees' will like it - and i think there would be a fair chance of violent conflict sooner or later - but there are 1000's who say they will die for freedom - and there's a lawful, good, and productive way to go about it with better odds than waiting for a SWAT team to come after you and your guns in your home alone at 4am.

another important point i should add is that this is the whole
purpose of a Militia - to uphold the Constitution and ensure it is in force and effect - and without a legitimate Command-in-Chief, the Militia is on its own now. so - i can't think of anything else for a Militia to do - if they can't ensure the Constitutionality of one county, what is the sense in any "right to bear arms"? the right is tied to the Militia - to ensure the force and effect of the Constitution. and a county is the smallest political subdivision where that can exist.

you know: the supreme court may very well pass on all the challenges to Obamas citizenship - because nothing is as it seems - nevertheless - it can't be made any more clear that there is little left when anyone in the world can now be made your "President/Tyrant/Authority" and Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful military and paramilitary police forces in the world.

i apologize a little for strong language, i just get a real bad
feeling that the concensus is to react as victims to whatever comes our way next; because i think there is more much more strength in having some organization/unification, and more strength in choosing the ground/situation; and much better possibilities/outcomes and ways to be productive.

it is difficult for me to imagine the media broadcasting such an action, without also imagining millions of people also getting energized/activated - seeing that some people
are taking a stand to live free outside the dictates of
agencies/agents/employees as the rest continue to suffer in the economy of the police state. everything else appears to me as frog-boiling-in-the-water stuff, and it makes me a little nervous.

this is an example of what we find in Alaska, which is probably similar to other states:

--

Peace officers such as a Sheriff should have the following:

1) must have an Oath of Office as a public officer under public seal in a public forum for inspection.

2) must have a Certificate of Election being elected by and accountable to the people of Alaska.

3) must have an Official Bond being highly bonded by his personal assets.

4) must be accountable by either recall or impeachment by the people for nonfeasance, misfeasance or malfeasance, and ouster from office
by quo warranto if the Oath, Certificate, and Bond were not accomplished before entering the duties of his Office (or within 15 days or so).

within the lawful government of the State of Alaska, as all other of the several States and the United States, there are only two types of people in the government:

A) the first is a public officer, which is a person that is
authorized and empowered by the people to exercise some of the sovereignty of the state over our life, liberty and property. this public officer has discretion within the limits of this authorized and empowered office. to assure that these people are properly authorized and empowered by the people of Alaska, the following items must be accomplished before entering the duties of their office. these items must be in a public forum for inspection by
we the people:

1. Oath of Office as a public officer of the State of Alaska under public seal. as the United States of America is an Oath swearing nation, this is our highest form of assurance that the person is bound by the our organic law, including the Constitution of the United States.

2. Certificate of Election or Civil Commission under public seal. the Alaska State Troopers are not elected by the people, but purportedly appointed, therefore they must have a Civil Commission from a public officer of the State of Alaska to authorize and empower them. this Civil Commission is very similar to the document that all Notary Publics have from the Lt. Governor that will always be displayed where the Notary Public notarizes documents.

3. the Official Bond is like a performance bond used by contractors and has the same purpose to assure performance of the public officer to the people, the Constitution, and the duties of their office. It is also a financial assurance that the public officer will not
deprive us of due process of law and violate our rights secured in the Constitution. the public officer will place their personal assets in the form of an official bond payable to the State of Alaska, it is specifically for the benefit of the people of Alaska if this public officer should damage us in some manner by their actions or lack of their action.

the office that they enter must be created by the Constitution or by the Legislature, and it is not mere employment. it will have a term of office along with specific duties of one of the three branches of government, being executive, legislative, or judicial.

B) the second is a public employee, which is a person that has only ministerial duties. they are not authorized or empowered to exercise any sovereignty of the state over our life, liberty, and property. they have specific duties for their job and they have supervisors that monitor their actions. they can not be impeached, recalled, or oustered from office, as there is no office.

the Judges and Justices (Magistrates) all have employee affidavits as public employees of the State of Alaska. this negates them being public officers of the State of Alaska. the employee affidavit is labeled as an Oath and a second Oath is also taken by the Magistrates as a deception for the Oath of Office of a public officer. the true Oath of Office of a public officer of the State of Alaska is found in Article XII section 5 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska and it is in quotation marks and can not be changed except by amendment. there are 41 words in this Oath and no Magistrate has this exact Oath of Office as a public officer of the State of Alaska.

the exact words are as follows from Article XII Section 5 of the Constitution of the State of Alaska:

all public officers, before entering upon the duties of their
offices, shall take and subscribe to the following oath or affirmation:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Alaska, and that I will faithfully discharge my duties as . . . to the best of my ability." the legislature may prescribe further oaths or affirmations.

the lower courts being the District Courts and Superior Courts have one style of the deceptive Oath of Office and the Supreme Court has another version of deceptive Oath of Office. they have changed the words around and the punctuation. the Oath of Office will not show the source of the Oath being the Constitution. they will use O A T H O F O F F I C E, with spaces between the letters of the words and underline the letters. this does not spell words, another deception.

the words used by John Reese are as follows:

I, JOHN REESE, do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of Alaska and that I will faithfully discharge my duties as a judicial officer for the State of Alaska to the best of my abilities.

there are many deceptions in this Oath. the name 'JOHN REESE' isn't in the public officer oath mandated. they have changed the 'Constitution of the United States' to the 'Constitution of the United States of America' and this is totally incorrect. the duties are as a judicial officer for the State of Alaska. this is not an office for a 'judicial officer for the State of Alaska', and it should read 'judge of the superior court'. the 'for' in this clearly demonstrates that the judicial officer is working 'for' the State of Alaska, just as if the prosecutor is a Prosecutor 'for' the State of Alaska. the judge is by the Law to be impartial and not a working 'for' the State of Alaska.

all judges are members of the Alaska Bar Association and the act creating the Bar (specifically in chapter 196, section 4 of year 1955) states that no judge in a court of record can be a member of the Bar. another illegal act by all of the Magistrates.

the Official Bond that the Magistrates purportedly have is found in the Alaska Rules of Court in the Administrative Rule 34, which is a mere Employee Dishonesty Bond only for the protection of the State of Alaska for employees stealing from the State of Alaska. Another deception.

the only Civil Commission that we have evidence of is for Jay Rabinowitz, who is a deceased Justice of the Supreme Court of Alaska. None exist for any Magistrate today as mandated by law. letters exist congratulating the Magistrates, but they are not even signed by the Governor. another deception.

impersonating a public officer is a misdemeanor charge.

--

agents are all that 'govt' is made of now, and they operate totally outside the Constitution, and have absolutely no Constitutional authority over any non-US/federal citizen/subject.

and really, how can anyone be a "US citizen"? you couldn't possibly be a "US citizen" because corporations cannot lawfully contract. any 'US citizen' document you signed was a unilateral, and hence, unenforceable contract. All Law is Commerce; All Commerce is Contract; No Contract - No Case.

--

are you aware of any city/county who is doing this yet?

Free State Wyoming has just such a plan and they are trying to execute it in Wyoming. In Wyoming the Sheriff is recognized as the highest law in the County and is in a good legal position to reign in Federal interlopers.

Ken Royce (a.k.a Boston T. Party) organized the Free State Wyoming and wrote about how the plan works (moving folks from county to county for specific elections) in his book Molon Labe, which I recommend highly.

--

yes, i know about these - but they aren't practical. we don't have enough people - they didn't even choose states with the lowest populations. states would require millions of patriots - a county only requires a few hundred - and it can be done almost immediately, and can be even more effective since a county wouldn't require a major overhaul to 'free'. it is a much more cohesive unit, where people can support each other and back each other up and train together. it is also an easier piece of ground to rally around in the event of angry govt *employees*. county-by-county freedom can spread much faster - freeing one county would be a big inspiration and would attract people from all over by the 1000's. the free-state projects are basically going nowhere - it is too much to bite off and it seems to me that time is not on our side - and the longer we also, keep in mind - it isn't only about federal interlopers - States are political subdivisions of the federal govt, and there is little that applies to the federal employees that doesn't apply as well to State employees in regards to operating under the color-of-office, color-of-authority, and color-of-law. they are all imposters. wait, the more diminishing the returns. you can only hold what you can defend - no matter what tricks you use to take over a state with a minority of patriots - it's useless if you can't defend your ground with force, and defending an entire state is much more problematic than defending a county. people can't drive dozens or 100's of miles from one city to another to defend someone being kidnapped by govt *employees*. a state isn't a very cohesive unit to take such stands.

--

Have you considered what the immediate response from state/fed/corp.gov would be?

1 - The 40,000,000-100,000,000+ new turd worlders that are going to soon be minted nuevo AmeriKans would be happy to plop down on corp.gov paid for housing and immediately negate any real American's vote. If that weren't the case, there are plenty of scuzzy dependents and their Libcom masters that would be happy to dilute a patriot-population.

2 - Accusations of; child molestation - drug manufacturing - income tax evasion - weapons caches - domestic terrorist haven - etc. would be used by corp.gov to demonize and then devastate such a community. There are several examples of how corp.gov handles these situations ergo Waco.

3 - "Commercial Services" would probably be refused in short order, encompassing a whole host of scenarios. Satellite communications would be the extent of contact with others outside such a community and those services would be denied eventually as well. An 'embargo' of sorts would likely be used with checkpoints in and out.

4 - I wouldn't put it past corp.gov to enlist their pals MIC and rain artillery down on the community if the bastards were taking losses of their spies and other 'agents'.

Victory will require the slaughter of several hundred Globalist agents inside AmeriKa, followed by a significant portion of the military not only disobeying luciferian orders but also assisting patriots in holding key locales and facilitating logistics.

The world socialist foot soldiers, such as some of the vast rodents that scurry about 4um, would have to be whacked whenever they get in the way. Some will stand for the Globalists and World Communism (and be killed) while others would once again pretend to be patriots and put Ron Paul bumper stickers back on the Priuses (watch these slippery pigs closely).

--

i do not know what the immediate response from govt *employees* would be, except to say that it would be unlawful if there were to be any. but i know it would be nice to see THEM reacting and wondering what to do for once! i know it would be nice to exercise some lawful power for once instead of living a victimized life waiting for the next hammer to be thrown down on me at a time and place and manner i do not know. i would feel better if i had some control and knowledge of the situation for once.

in regards to your points:

#1: there is no govt-paid housing in the small counties. they are farm/ranch land, perfect for self-sufficiency if it proves necessary.

#2: yes, there would be propaganda to work against - fortunately, we have a lot of media under 'our' control now - the web, the radio networks, etc. and we might not have these things forever. propaganda is something that needs to be dealt with no matter what happens - but things will be much easier in that regard if we have higher standing in regards to being lawful. also, Waco was less than 100 people - a county would be a bigger area with 100's of people, with 1000's nearby that would probably activate in case of any bad events.

#3: a rural county with several 100 people isn't dependent on "commercial services". they are rural areas where one can live self-sustainably as a community for a very long time. it would be difficult to totally seal off the 100's of square miles of a rural county. it would require much more manpower than than govt *employees* could muster for long, especially if similar things started happening in other county's. also, it's important to remember this isn't about finding a life of leisure and comfort, it's a war against tyranny.

#4: raining artillary is for areas of concentrated targets - 1000 people over 100's of square miles is not a good target for bombs, etc. also, having control of the ground and knowledge of the situation allows people to prepare in various ways that they couldn't otherwise. and again, i have to think that 1000's would rally around any kind of violent conflict in such a county. and as the Militia without a lawful Commander-in-Chief, they have every right and duty to do so.

also, keep in mind - the county mentioned is on the Gulf Coast - you'd have to block the ocean, plus all the land - all for a few 100 patriots :) it would be a major task to stop such an effort. i imagine things like this: there is some kind of warning system that can be triggered by phone or some other means which can alert everyone by radio if there is any govt *employee* in the county that is trying to exercise authority, at which time everyone within a few square miles is deputized to come to the aid of the Sheriff in arresting such an employee for impersonating a public officer and whatever of the other numerous charges you want to lay on them. you can fine them or keep them in jail for a while as bargaining chips - i don' t know - i haven't thought it all out yet. but it is interesting to contemplate. victory only happens when you have the peasants on your side. you can't win a revolution if you are against the farmers/ranchers - because they are at the root of the food chain, the root of any nations survival - so - that is in our favor - because we can free them of taxes, regulations, Monsanto harrassment, etc. we can make the peasants prosperous, whereas, govt *employees* and bankers only lie, cheat, and steal from them and make their life hell so they can live high on the hog while others do all their dirty work for them. you win a revolution with the support of peasants - you can't win without it, and you can't lose with it. killing Globalists has little to do with things - the land is at the root, and those that work it - Globalists and Bankers are way down the food chain. you win a revolution by taking control of the food chain - the rural areas. everyone else is dependent on those areas, and they fall whichever way those in control of rural areas want them to fall. we don't need to "whack" and chase them down - we only need to take control and defend rural areas - please consider this ... whoever has control of the soil, and the support of those that work the soil, wins. nothing/noone else matters.

Here's a page that explains why the FSP is so important after the 2008 election:

http://freestateproject.org/intro/2008_election

"I am a friend of the Free State Project. Check it out, join and continue the effort!" -- Rep. Ron Paul

FreeStateProject.org

The best vacation ever: http://www.porcf