Wouldn't anyone see the demolitions being planted on 9/11??
Submitted by punjabimunda on Tue, 12/23/2008 - 21:24How could they get away with it?
»
Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America
  |
User login
Daily Paul Features
Top Recent Topics
Newest & Top
New |
Top |
YouTubes |
Ron Paul 2012 |
|
|
★
|
★
Active Forum Topics
Recent Comments
The Daily Paul is a community website with no official affiliation with Ron Paul or his Presidential Committee. The content of posts and comments on the Daily Paul represent the opinions of the original poster, and are not endorsed, approved, or otherwise representative of the opinions of the Daily Paul, its owner, site moderators or Ron Paul. This site may contain adult language and adult concepts. If you are offended by such content, or feel you may be offended by such content, point your browser to a different site IMMEDIATELY. For more, read the Full Disclaimer
© 2007 - 2011 by The Daily Paul. Not paid for by, nor officially affiliated in any way with Ron Paul. | General Site Disclaimer | DMCA Disclaimer | Advertise here
If I remember correctly...
..Bush's OTHER brother was the security chief for the Port Authority, and in the few months prior to the "attack", the security cameras were turned off at different times, guards' rounds were changed for the first time ever...oh, and Bush's last day as Chief of Security? October 1st, 2001. Naw..just coincidences...
------------------
BC
'No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.'
-- Samuel Adams (letter to James Warren, 4 November 1775)
------------------
BC
Silence isn't always golden....sometimes it's yellow.
"The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them." - Patrick Henry
Marvin Bush was in charge of security for the trade center
complex on 911 , that is a fact. He is a first cousin.
~Mikael / Peace, love, Light and unity ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Stop the NWO....It's just illumi..Naughty !
Wrong
Bush's brother was not security chief:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh8hErn2UZU
Where do you come up with this shit? I guess it's more satisfying to go around making baseless accusations rather than do actual fact checking and research.
Register as Republican and Vote for Ron Paul
Bush and Cousin Walker involved
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/10-16-03/discussion.cgi.16....
...According to two articles in the Progressive Populist written by Margie Burns, from 1993 to 2000, Bush served on the board of Securacom (since renamed Stratesec). The chairman of the board of Stratesec is Wirt D. Walker III, a cousin of Marvin and George W. Bush. Securacom had contracts to provide security for Dulles International Airport (the airport from which American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, originated) and the World Trade Center in New York.
Securacom's backers include a number of Kuwaitis through a company called KuwAm Corp (Kuwaiti-American Corp.). Stratesec also has Saudi investors.
Walker also serves as a managing director of KuwAm, which maintains offices within the Watergate complex along with Riggs Bank, on whose board Bush's uncle, Jonathan Bush, sits. Saudi Princess Haifa al Faisal, the wife of Saudi Ambassador to the US Prince Bandar, used a Riggs account to funnel money to Omar al Bayoumi and Osama Basnan, two Saudi students in California associated with two of the 911 hijackers.
i.16.html
Again, you need proof!
There is zero proof that Walker is even related to the Bush family.
Register as Republican and Vote for Ron Paul
Here's your lineage...
George H.W. Bush's (father of George W. Bush) mother was a Walker (Dorothy Wear Walker Bush). Her dad was George Herbert Walker.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Walker_Bush
Stop dancing little bitch!!
"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iERLtsBIqDg
That does not prove a relation with Wirt Walker
That does not prove a relation with Wirt Walker. You would need to prove a genealogical link between them i.e. through mothers and siblings.
Register as Republican and Vote for Ron Paul
It does not prove
anything, but there is little information in general about Wirt D. Walker III, if any at all. Even the Wiki article about Wirt Walker was deleted, I wonder why that is? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wirt_Walker
So we can go back and forth all day, but until you can provide us with proof that he is NOT a cousin (and by proof, I don't mean post something from a "debunker" website), I will assume they are family because of the Stratesec connection.
"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iERLtsBIqDg
No.
The burden of proof is on you.
CHA-CHING!
Trolls unite
From an outside viewer stance on this he just made you and Bbagnall look like fools.
Find out if you have a local militia - http://www.uaff.us/
Real Patriots for 9/11 truth -- http://patriotsquestion911.com/
Bush/Walker
Barbara Bush was a Walker this is her nephew perhaps you are in denial that a disaster of this proportion could have happened without an pre-planning.
Thank God we can still all have our own opinion in America
Actually...
George H.W. Bush's mother was a Walker (Dorothy Wear Walker Bush).
Her dad was George Herbert Walker. Your observation of bbagnall still stands though.
"We dare not forget that we are heirs of that first revolution" -JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iERLtsBIqDg
But there is no proof of a relationship!
You actually need to link Wirt Walker to the Bush family! What are the familial relationships that link this man Wirt Walker to the Bushs?
Register as Republican and Vote for Ron Paul
????
Your video only proves Bush's brother was involved in security related matters for the World Trade Center. You can argue details certainly but hardly vindicates Bush family involvement in the events of 9/11.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
I can't prove EVERYTHING with one video
Look, I can disprove what truthers are saying in this one instance, but I can't disprove every negative you come up with. That would be impossible.
Register as Republican and Vote for Ron Paul
130,000 people worked on the ...
development of the A bomb and it was kept secret. Frankly the argument of it could not happen because we would know is historically inaccurate.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
Not really
the soviets eventually found out by spys. I'm sure some info and insiders would have leaked info.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_spies
Project Manhattan was
Project Manhattan was crawling with spies. The Soviets knew about the a-bomb before the American public did.
This video answers some questions with straight up ....
mathematics, chemistry and physics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNCRnlKfQXc&feature=ytn%3Ampt...
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
Join PyraBang the peoples search engine.
no matter how it was done, it was done over a period
of time so as not draw any attention.
"Oop, dont mind this large
"Oop, dont mind this large mass of explosives."
The amount of explosives needed to destroy these two buildings would a) be too big to be loaded up over time without SOMEONE noticing, or b) be too massive of an operation to be done in one night without EVERYONE noticing.
Unless you give me proof, I call you a liar.
(mostly unvarified)
Paul Laffoley, a designer on the WTC construction project claims that demolition devices were quite possibly installed at the time of construction.
WTC was built by Laden construction. The towers themselves dedicated to Nelson and David Rockefeller. Laffoley, from what I understand was fired from the project for introducing a 17 sky-bridge concept which would link the two buildings together. Evidently that would ruin the 11 symbol in the sky as you look up at the towers.
Assuming the assumption that the interpretation of the symbolism involved is correct. The demolition of the towers themselves could be seen as a ritualistic sacrifice. Death and resurrection, order out of chaos...
Anyway, Laffoley insinuates that the idea of constructing buildings made to be demolished was a popular concept in those days and there really is no telling how many buildings are constructed in such ways. I mean yeah, I could see them planning this whole thing way before the building were built. But building buildings that are already set to demo? I've never heard of such a thing.
I'm looking for a snippet to post. He mentions this in about one minute out of an hour long interview.
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."
The Twin Towers were built
The Twin Towers were built in the 1960s. The blueprints don't show that they were built to be demolished.
You are looking for a novel solution to a problem that doesn't exist. The explosives were planted into the WTC within one week of 9/11, by insiders.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.
I actually haven't formed an
I actually haven't formed an opinion about it. Just reporting what someone else claims. You can dismiss it off hand if you want to I'm not holding it against you. But don't you dare presume to know my mind.
Now let me ask you this? Can you verify your blueprint case? I can't even prove that you exist. I doubt you can prove any blueprints you find are in fact the original blueprints used.
"Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."
More Blueprint info:
Tower Blueprints
Surviving Evidence of the World Trade Center Attack
The blueprints to the Twin Towers and Building 7 remained off-limits to the public for more than five years after the attack, despite the fact that the buildings were built with public money and that the engineering drawings of public buildings are supposed to be public information. 1 Incredibly, the team of engineers from the ASCE that conducted the only investigation of the building "collapses" before Ground Zero had been cleaned up lacked access to the buildings' blueprints -- at least until they signed waivers that they would not use the evidence in a lawsuit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 2
READ MORE:
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/blueprints.html
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.
Thanks for the links. But
Thanks for the links. But tell me. How can you or I be sure that they're legit?
Slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When you understand the United States is a corporation which is but a fictional entity which has been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."
Don't you just watch the TV special
on the construction of the two towers?
Unify
Don't own a TV. Look all I'm
Don't own a TV.
Look all I'm getting at here is technically I can't even prove your existence. So really how can you assure me you are real? You see what I'm getting at now?
Slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When you understand the United States is a corporation which is but a fictional entity which has been placed into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in fictions.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."
The fact that the WTC
The fact that the WTC blueprints have never been officially released is what we call in law, guilty demeanor.
The blueprints prove that the WTC had 47 massive steel core columns, which of course, can't be destroyed by one airolane.
The 9/11 Commission report of 2004 denies the existance of the core, a statement coordinated with the non-release of the blueprints.
A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for James Madison.
That there be a dangerous question for the truthers...
...
CHA-CHING!