3 votes

Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

Dear, Addressed persons

I here present you with a Notice of Understanding and Intent. I am sending this letter out as a courtesy in order to avoid any further confusion or potential conflict. I am now expanding the reach of my discourse in order to maintain my honor and ensure maximum clarity between myself and all agents of government. After receiving this letter, please expect a Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right in order to ensure maximum clarity amongst all parties.As a peaceful man desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfully with maximum freedom, I have recently been studying the history of the united states along with its legal system and have come to some very interesting conclusions. After reading various acts and exploring the way language is used in those acts, I have realized that “lawful” and “legal” are not always the same. It also appears that all acts and statutes in US are only contracts based in commerce. Therefore I am now contacting the various government officials named above in the hopes that someone can either confirm or correct my understanding. If you do choose to respond with corrections, I must insist that you do so within Fourteen(14) days of service of this letter, in writing, via registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or attestation with full commercial liability and penalty of perjury. A lack of response or response that does not contain proof of my mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to imply agreement with my understanding. Failure to dispute the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence. Now, specifically in The United States I understand that there is both a common law and statute law tradition, which is interesting, because I also understand that a statute is a legislated rule of a society, which has the force of law upon members of that society; a society being a fictional legal entity such as a corporation. I also understand that the Government of the US is not a nation as I thought it was, occupying a geographical location, but instead merely a corporation with de-facto authority, rather than lawful. This corporation can only make corporate/contract law that has the force of law only upon its consenting members. From my research, the “law of the land,” is the peaceful common law, which is not influenced by acts and statutes. Under common law, the rights, freedoms, and duties of private individuals have long been established and unlike statute law, common law has had a progression towards more freedom and personal responsibility rather than less. Among the rights and freedoms understood by common law are such things as the rights to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof, privacy, peace, and the ability to travel freely in public without harassment or intimidation. The obligations and duties of those living under common law are essentially to ensure that one does not infringe or allow others to infringe upon those unalienable rights and freedoms.I have also learned that the rights of a free spiritual being cannot be lawfully limited without consent, as that would imply slavery. Effectively, rights are not bestowed upon one by another unless the first gives his/her consent, or the first is the lawful property of the second. The very nature of the concept of consent is that it can only exist amongst equals with full disclosure and without coercion. I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as a slave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or represented by any governmental agent, although at times I have been deceived and intimidated into submission. Although the various rights and freedoms are self-evident and unalienable, in order to be. In order for lawful representation to exist, there must be mutual consent, and that consent may be revoked for any reason depending on the nature of a specific contract between the two parties. I am hereby notifying all who read this and any other interested parties that I have revoked my consent to be governed by fictitious corporate entities with which I do not have a subsisting contract. I declare that I am neither a child nor a slave, but a free man capable of administering my own affairs.

Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

Whereas it is my understanding The United States of America is a common law jurisdiction, and,
Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,
Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in The United States of America is a representative one, and,
Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and,,
Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SSN (Social Security Number) are in fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federal government, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SSN, and,
Whereas it is my understanding people in The United States of America have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,
Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,
Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,
Whereas I, Given name: Family name am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach
the peace, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,
Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and,
Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,
Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,
Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,
Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by the United States or any of its agencies creates no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,
Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,
Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,
Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time,

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, ______:_______a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter .

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right.

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure.

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in The United States are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent.

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.
Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ________:________

Place of claim of right:

Dated: __________________________________

Claimant: _________:_________

Notary Public: ____________________________

Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.

Outline and information comes from ThinkFree.ca, and can be used in any commonwealth jurisdiction.

They have a few videos on google

Bursting bubbles:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7040453665540929835

Magnificent Deception:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6729904244308031068



Trending on the Web

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Customize It!

If ya know a little bit more about this stuff you can customize it to include your your car for instance. Put in the notice that your car used for transportation and is yours and if it's theirs they need to speak up or else it's mine and include your own made up license plate. Then get rid of the drivers license, license plates and registration. Make your own plate up with the included number. State that your not a driver and that your a man using his private property for transportation on public roads, which is your right.

In order to secure Actual Legal/ Lawful Title to the.......

vehicle, you must secure the Manufacturers Certificate of Origin ( MCO ) and have the current Equitable Title (which is what everyone currently receives when the vehicle is paid off) converted to the Legal Title of Ownership. The MCO, once received by the dealership, is quickly transferred to the state via the DMV or a state registry of comparable status. Good Luck. A very difficult if not impossible task for those interested in taking this path. I've read detailed articles about this very subject matter, however, I have absolutely zero personal experience.

USA as Corporation

UNITED STATES is a Corporation - There are Two Constitutions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0

TheAntiTerrorist on Corporate Control
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpESn0mxSdk&feature=channel_page

"There can be only one permanent revolution - a moral one: The regeneration of the inner man."
—Tolstoy

"The body is but a vessel for the soul,
A puppet which bends to the soul's tyranny.
And lo, the body is not eternal,
For it must feed on the flesh of others,
Lest it return to the dust whence it came.
Therefore the soul deceives and despises."

Let Me See If I've Got This Right

Is the government a totally fictional entity (a corporation) that has no jurisdiction over sovereign individuals? Is that what this means? I've seen this kind of stuff before, but understanding it is another thing. Can anybody explain this in terms that a SIX YEAR-OLD CAN UNDERSTAND?

This is the best explanation

This is the best explanation out there: http://teamlaw.org/history.htm and http://teamlaw.org/Mythology.htm#FreedomToFascism

A person places him/herself in the corporation's jurisdiction when he/she applies for and uses it's tax identification number. The relationship that is created by the corporation through the Social Security Administration is that of a trust with the United States General Trust Fund as the beneficiary, not the individual using the number.

When the SSN/TIN is in play it is the trust that is acting and not the sovereign person. Due to this the corporation owns nearly everything in the United States of America under color of title.

Basically you have it right...

...But don't be foolish enough to think USA Inc. cares.

that's nifty

Fortune Favors the Bold

but what does it really matter? laws are ultimately what the people with the guns say they are.

Fortune Favors the Bold

fireant's picture

When the time comes.

they will just say they don't care what your contract says, just like today they will tell you they don't care what's in the Constitution (I've had enforcement officers tell me that). Then it will be a matter of who has the biggest gun.

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”
-Sam Adams

Undo what Wilson did

“It does not require a

“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds”

Of course this is exactly what the ruling elite has been doing to the public for years. They tell us over and over the way they want us to think, and eventually we think that way. Now people think that tyranny is liberty.

I've watched the videos, what about the US

Freedom is not FREE!!

angle. Has anyone tried any of this. Come on someone must be close. We need an understanding of the laws for corporations, human beings and persons. I am in total agreement that this is real and possible. Give me a couple of lawyer patriots to talk with and I would blow this country apart.

I will go to the library tomorrow and get a copy of Black's Law Dictionary and try my best to understand.

Freedom is not FREE!!

What US?

HJR-192 backed up by Public Law Chapt. 48, 48 Stat. 112 publicly declares all debts are canceled because Gold and Silver were taken away. There was no way to pay our debts, so Congress discharged all past and future debts.

That US?

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Thank You

Freedom is not FREE!!

I saw something like this a while back and neglected to print it. Thank you for your efforts and help

Freedom is not FREE!!

Yes, thank you Logic!

Printed and copied for use as needed. Thanks for your patience and any further explanation you may provide us. We're learning more every day!

Yes,

We are sure of that.

Free-Men

IIRC, there was a group of Free-men in Pennsylvania --- again, if my memory serves, this would have been during Clinton's first term.

They were "busted" for driving without a D.L., registration, inspection, yada yada yada. It sounds like they were ahead of their time... or perhaps I should say that we're that much farther behind in our self-governence.

I wish I was more in tune with the reality of the Corporation of the UNITED STATES... they did pique my interest, but I quickly lost interest - instead I decided to booze-it-up and chase tail... lol

HERE's my ?
To whom should the Free-Man address this Notice?
Has anyone here sent theirs?
Any replies?
Any situations?
Does the Free-Man have the ability to become gainfully employed with a Corporation, Company or Industry? If so, is that not a contract, of sorts? Does that contract have any implications with regards to the Claim of Right?

All I can say - thus far - is thank you.

You get it notarized and

You get it notarized and send it to the secretary of state. But I don't suggest doing so until you really know it. Even the people that do know it get shaken when they're in court. There is no such thing as over prepared. Remember that what we, "know for sure", has been collected over time and put together like a puzzle threw trial and error. Some of these people have been to jail more than once for not doing it right but having the opportunity to corroborate information in previous cases with other people in the same situations.

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

To everyone!

You claim your rights and have them say that what your saying is NOT true. They can't tell you its not true because it is.

Once you've claimed your rights you can also submit a fee schedule, that usually keeps them away from you.

www.ThinkFree.ca to find out who you are.
www.TeamLaw.net to find out what our country is really about.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Yeahbaby!!! That's what i'm talking about!!

Estoppel by acquiescence!!!

Man, reading that feels like cool air on my face at twilight before the dawn. Soon, freedom will be peering over the horizon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m9MGaJwfkU

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Does this

protect you from getting picked up by the Corporate American gestapo police? I would like a little info as to if this has helped you say, not pay taxes. What have the benefits been for you since you have done this?
Thanks.

"We can see with our eyes, hear with our ears and feel with our touch, but we understand with our hearts."

The thing is we're coming at

The thing is we're coming at them with lawful and legal precedence. They cannot answer this letter or the jig is up. If they do they'll be committing perjury. So they can't answer. And, it's notarized so when you go to court. You take control of the whole thing. You enter in your evidence and if they keep pushing it. You slap them with counter charges of fraud. The important thing is that they know it'll sting if they lose in the appeal. Of course the appeals court has no choice but to follow the code.

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it."

Many subtleties

are lost on the "wakeful."
Thanks - I get you, and will be using this info.

Truth exists, and it deserves to be cherished.

Welcome to freedom.

I plan to submit my documents this year.

For those of you who don't understand what he did, he essentially claimed rights and asked the "government", which is really just a corporation, to dispute those claims. After not doing so it is set as truth between him, the man, and the corporation.

Essentially he is returning to his State Citizen status, which is what the entire country was before the creation of the "person". Do the research yourself and you shall find the light.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Tis a shame.

That pretty much a large majority here aren't intelligent enough to give this a clear honest reading and attention.

I'm almost about to give up.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Sucks doesn't it.

They are trying to hang on to a remnant that never existed.

If people woke up humanity

If people woke up humanity would enter into a golden age. As predicted by many ancient societies.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

Yeah I understand that. But

Yeah I understand that. But I figured I might as well try to "stir the shit" as opposed to just asking for people's attention. I guess sometimes "bad press" can be still be good for getting people's attention.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.

bump

I reserve the right to govern myself.

I reserve the right to govern myself.