Professor Predicts the End of the U.S. - Must Read!

0 votes

From Wall Street Journal:

MOSCOW -- For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument -- that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. -- very seriously. Now he's found an eager audience: Russian state media.

In recent weeks, he's been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. "It's a record," says Prof. Panarin. "But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger."

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry's academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.

But it's his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin's views also fit neatly with the Kremlin's narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.

A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.

"There's a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur," he says. "One could rejoice in that process," he adds, poker-faced. "But if we're talking reasonably, it's not the best scenario -- for Russia." Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces -- with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

In addition to increasing coverage in state media, which are tightly controlled by the Kremlin, Mr. Panarin's ideas are now being widely discussed among local experts. He presented his theory at a recent roundtable discussion at the Foreign Ministry. The country's top international relations school has hosted him as a keynote speaker. During an appearance on the state TV channel Rossiya, the station cut between his comments and TV footage of lines at soup kitchens and crowds of homeless people in the U.S. The professor has also been featured on the Kremlin's English-language propaganda channel, Russia Today.

Mr. Panarin's apocalyptic vision "reflects a very pronounced degree of anti-Americanism in Russia today," says Vladimir Pozner, a prominent TV journalist in Russia. "It's much stronger than it was in the Soviet Union."

Mr. Pozner and other Russian commentators and experts on the U.S. dismiss Mr. Panarin's predictions. "Crazy ideas are not usually discussed by serious people," says Sergei Rogov, director of the government-run Institute for U.S. and Canadian Studies, who thinks Mr. Panarin's theories don't hold water.

Mr. Panarin's résumé includes many years in the Soviet KGB, an experience shared by other top Russian officials. His office, in downtown Moscow, shows his national pride, with pennants on the wall bearing the emblem of the FSB, the KGB's successor agency. It is also full of statuettes of eagles; a double-headed eagle was the symbol of czarist Russia.

The professor says he began his career in the KGB in 1976. In post-Soviet Russia, he got a doctorate in political science, studied U.S. economics, and worked for FAPSI, then the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National Security Agency. He says he did strategy forecasts for then-President Boris Yeltsin, adding that the details are "classified."

In September 1998, he attended a conference in Linz, Austria, devoted to information warfare, the use of data to get an edge over a rival. It was there, in front of 400 fellow delegates, that he first presented his theory about the collapse of the U.S. in 2010.

"When I pushed the button on my computer and the map of the United States disintegrated, hundreds of people cried out in surprise," he remembers. He says most in the audience were skeptical. "They didn't believe me."

At the end of the presentation, he says many delegates asked him to autograph copies of the map showing a dismembered U.S.

He based the forecast on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he says. He predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.

California will form the nucleus of what he calls "The Californian Republic," and will be part of China or under Chinese influence. Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. Washington, D.C., and New York will be part of an "Atlantic America" that may join the European Union. Canada will grab a group of Northern states Prof. Panarin calls "The Central North American Republic." Hawaii, he suggests, will be a protectorate of Japan or China, and Alaska will be subsumed into Russia.

"It would be reasonable for Russia to lay claim to Alaska; it was part of the Russian Empire for a long time." A framed satellite image of the Bering Strait that separates Alaska from Russia like a thread hangs from his office wall. "It's not there for no reason," he says with a sly grin.

Interest in his forecast revived this fall when he published an article in Izvestia, one of Russia's biggest national dailies. In it, he reiterated his theory, called U.S. foreign debt "a pyramid scheme," and predicted China and Russia would usurp Washington's role as a global financial regulator.

Americans hope President-elect Barack Obama "can work miracles," he wrote. "But when spring comes, it will be clear that there are no miracles."

The article prompted a question about the White House's reaction to Prof. Panarin's forecast at a December news conference. "I'll have to decline to comment," spokeswoman Dana Perino said amid much laughter.

For Prof. Panarin, Ms. Perino's response was significant. "The way the answer was phrased was an indication that my views are being listened to very carefully," he says.

The professor says he's convinced that people are taking his theory more seriously. People like him have forecast similar cataclysms before, he says, and been right. He cites French political scientist Emmanuel Todd. Mr. Todd is famous for having rightly forecast the demise of the Soviet Union -- 15 years beforehand. "When he forecast the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1976, people laughed at him," says Prof. Panarin.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,473529,00.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

This is not the only work on this topic.

In the 1990's a book called "Civil War Two" presented a similar analysis. The author looked at demographics around the world where there are genocidal conflicts and assessed the US along those lines. His thinking is that the US could break up into three separate countries and that ethnicity will play a major role.

He sees the Southwest as being claimed as a Northern province of Mexico and the South coming under pressure to split as a predominately black populated nation, while the rest of the nation remaining under the control of those of European descent. He presents no timetable, but gives way points to watch.

Also, in "The Fourth Turning" predictions of the current crisis to be followed by a nation threatening conflict are fit into a long cyclical pattern of history. 1776, 1861, 1941, and 2020 are equivalent points in time in the patterns they analyze. Two of the last three cycles resulted in civil conflict, and the conditions are now prime for a repeat.

My own thinking is that we face an extraordinary future. I think the end of the industrial age for want of energy to fuel it will cause a major economic contraction. The "house of cards monetary system" which is now collapsing, I think was shaken by our arrival at peak oil production and related increased energy cost. We will have economic contraction from the shock of that collapse, but when the economy attempts to restart it will not be able to expand from energy constraints. A future with a constantly shrinking economic pie will cause all sorts of civil disorder. Up to this point, our rulers have been able to intrude into the free markets and rig the economy in favor of government and the privileged few at the expense of the many, because the expanding pie allowed for small improvements in the living standard of the average man. As the suffering increases, the inequities from the controlled economy will become more evident, but those in power are highly unlikely to restore freedom to economic activity, so conflict will erupt. The pain from revolution will be less than the pain from going along and the forces of nature will propel us into a fight amongst ourselves for survival.

It may not seem this minute that revolution would be worth the pain, but consider that when half the population is unemployed with little hope for work, people are homeless, cold, hungry and sick, then they will have little to lose by fighting back, and that is just not that far into the future.

"The deepest sin against the human mind is to believe things without evidence." Thomas H. Huxley

Well the professor is correct about 2 things.

1) the U.S. is the cause of the unrest in the middle east.

and

2) the U.S. greedy banksters are the cause of the global financial meltdown.

PUT THE GLASSES ON!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68VnskJNkzA

Utter Horsesh*t

The Professor is a well known opium & vodka user

"If you don't stand behind our troops, PLEASE feel free to stand in front of them!"

Russia had better just worry

Russia had better just worry about themselves! they have plenty of their own problems to deal with!

"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson

I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain

“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)

Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐

"Texas will be the heart of

"Texas will be the heart of "The Texas Republic," a cluster of states that will go to Mexico or fall under Mexican influence. "

Hardly. Texas is in no danger of coming under Mexico's heel. There's some confusion here about who is subservient to whom.

What Texas is actually becoming is a plantation culture where the anglos run the businesses and shuffle the paperwork, and the Mexicans do all the labor. I don't like it, but that's the reality, and unsecured borders entrench it more every year.

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

SUPPORT OUR FOUNDERS' AMERICA
Support the Constitution of the United States

The neocons have a club, and we're not in it.

Further, the mexicans have a club, and a white guy's aren't in it.
Whitey will not find work in as a ketchen helper, even though he or she may speak spanish, simply doesn't come from the "home boy" club in Sinaloa, or another part of Mexico.
But things are changing for the better. There was a time when our local Taco Bell employees spoke only Mexican, and it was difficult to understand their english.

And never forget, “Humans, despite our artistic pretensions, our sophistication and many accomplishments, owe the fact of our existence to a six-inch layer of topsoil and the fact that it rains.”

Does this mean we don't get

Does this mean we don't get to have that shiny new North American Union? I thought all this chaos was going to pave the way for that, but I guess the all powerful country of Mexico is going to take control of the southeast instead. I mean, I can see China taking the West but seriously Mexico taking the South and East??! Worthwhile article but, I just don't see all of it happening like the author says it will.

-----------------------
"Whether you listen to the left side of the government's mouth or the rightside, either way it's the same mouth"

A man who has hate in his heart is not a free man

I love how Russia Today is

I love how Russia Today is called a "propaganda outlet" as if our media outlets are not full of Washington propaganda.

http://federalfallacy.com

Confederate States of America

That would be cool to see this massive empire disolve into several different states. Maybe the warhawks would calm down and try to live in peace for a change. Let the Chinese and Ruskies police the world for a change. They can't screw it up any worse than we did.