Thought police: tough job, someone HAS to do it?Submitted by paul4won on Sat, 01/10/2009 - 08:32
"Please do not write anything that Dr. Paul himself would not say or would not approve of, or that would reflect poorly on Dr. Paul or his organizations."
If we are only to be parrots of what Dr. Paul would say, there is no point in our having a discussion. We can all go hit google and youtube and endlessly ruminate over what Dr. Paul ACTUALLY said, rather than come here and try to paraphrase or rephrase his words.
Is there any room for a NEW thought? Not unless Dr. Paul has it first.
Is there any one defending the Constitution? Why, Dr. Paul is, of course! Except that part about free speech. If we have something to say that "would reflect poorly" on a man or an organization that supposedly supports liberty, it must not be worthy of discussion. Of course, knowing what would "reflect poorly" is a matter of not only making sure my THOUGHTS are just like Dr. Paul's, but that the thoughts of the READER will also fall into line.
What about Dr. Paul's calls for Civil disobedience? Anybody ever going to talk about that? Not here, it might reflect poorly, and by definition will be advocating something unlawful.
The r3VOLution is indeed now the R3VOlution - killed by the censors who championed Dr. Paul rather than his message of LIBERTY. I understand legal ramifications for manystrom, but this business of holding us all up to the standard of "would Dr. Paul say or do that?" is absurd. None of US can be Dr. Paul, and to try prevents US from becoming critical thinking, successful activists.
Dr. Paul has nothing to say about the Rothschilds and the banksters that have overthrown our government. If we keep THAT topic off the table, we are as bad as the MSM. And why Dr. Paul will NOT challenge this slander of the people who wish to expose the FACTUAL conspiracies, like when Prescott Bush attempted to overthrow this government, makes him someone I no longer wish to emulate. I want to be MORE courageous than him, I want to EXPOSE the corruption that he is content to let carry on, I want to NAME NAMES of the CONSPIRATORS rather than coddle them for my own safety.
Good luck to you all. It is an interesting way to fight for freedom, to begin with censorship. That is indeed following the Dr.'s lead, the FIRST thing this movement asked me to do was help them hide 9-11. I consider that my FIRST sell out, and I hope it will be my last. I will always wonder... what if I had spent all that time, money and effort on exposing the 9-11 lie, rather than throw it at the campaign of a man who never wanted or intended to win?
Wonder how quickly this will disappear. Oh well, I got to say it at least, even if no one will be allowed to share my horrible, horrible, message of free speech being worth defending, even from Ron Paul.
I found the discussion a much better representation of "the message" when any idiot could post their propaganda, and the patriots could hone their debate skills shooting them down. But that would leave all those thought policemen out of work.