0 votes

and lastly the ultimate form for income tax. The W-0 form. I have used this form every year since 2004

I have used the W-0 form every year since 2004, the IRS issued me a closing notice after they received it. Before that they were sending me letters every 3 months.

http://www.sedm.org/Forms/Tax/Withholding/w0.pdf

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Okay...maybe I'm just

up too late tonight.

What exactly is the benefit of this form?

www.urbannaturals.net

to state that you dont have

to state that you dont have federally privileged status or income, which is what can legally be taxed.

If you sign that form, you

If you sign that form, you are stating that you are an Officer of the Government. PENALTY of perjury, singular. Penalties of perjury, plural. Only a Government Office can be held in Double Jeopardy for one offense of Perjury. And the Government can and HAS held a trials for a Common Man for ONE offense, after being first acquitted, for the same offense. This is double Jeopardy.

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" Bugs Bunny
"Scwewy Wabbit!" Elmer Fudd

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

A major shortcoming in

A major shortcoming in Codified Commercial Law that the IRS likes to capitalize on is that an unrefuted claim is presumed to be true. That is why the citizen MUST always and immediately respond to any and all erroneous claims made by the IRS. According to Commercial Law, the rebuttal must be made in 72 hours from the time of presentment. The rebuttal for an erroneous tax bill can be as simple as, “I don’t owe this and this is not a true bill of commerce.” One of the necessities of Commercial Law is that all affidavits must be signed and attested to be “true, correct, and complete.” The IRS cannot and does not attest its “presentments” to individuals. When properly utilized, the ultimate advantage in Commercial Law goes to the Sovereign who has the final, unrebuttable truth on his or her side as an affidavit. By understanding the rules that the IRS operates under, it becomes a simple matter to beat them at their own game! Commercial Law is nonjudicial. That’s how the IRS takes away Citizen’s property without a day in Court. However, Patriots are currently using the non-judicial aspect of the Commercial Law to lien the property of corrupt Government officials who do not uphold their oath and known duty to support the Constitution.

no

no

I hope MikeLawson will post

I hope MikeLawson will post on this again, as I have sent him my documents

I did.

.

No OMB number

There's no OMB number on your form. Therefore it's completely invalid, illegal and nonsense.

"(the obligation to file a

"(the obligation to file a tax return stems from 26 U.S.C. 7203, not from any agency's demand... 7203 requires a "return" but does not define that word or require anyone to use Form 1040, or any "official" form at all.") (7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, United States v. Partridge, (2007)
you can send in a napkin with the info in crayon if you want

26 USC 7203 is a PUNISHMENT

26 USC 7203 is a PUNISHMENT Clause. It in no way defines WHO is obligated to file, keep records, or whom owes a tax, ect. ect. IT DOES NOT DEFINE WHO IS OBLIGATED.

If one is subpoenaed for financial records, and one submits these records, this submission of records is considered your admission that you are a person required to keep records. If you dispute a tax AMOUNT, then you are admitting that you are a person required to pay a tax, if you file a return you are admitting that you are a person required to file a return. If you plead the "5th", the courts have already ruled that you CANNOT use the 5th amendment to with hold your records. If you plead the 5th, and say that you will not disclose your records, you have just admitted that such records do in fact exist.

Never admit to having any financial records that are REQUIRED to be kept. Ask the IRS to define WHO is required to keep records. "Well your honor, I can not state if these records do OR do not exist, as I am unable to determine from the Codes if I am or am NOT a person required to keep such records. If an agent can direct me to the Code that DEFINES who is required to keep such records, possibly I will be able to determine if such records do or do not exist".

The obligation to maintain records and file does in fact STEM from 7203, but in fact 7203 DOES NOT define the "who" is required to file. The Burden of Proof lie upon the IRS to prove that you are indeed a person Required to file, keep records, pay taxes. If they get your records, they WILL prove that you are required to file and pay. But without your records, there is no way, short of your own admission, that you are a person required to keep records. If you have an employer, they already have your records.
----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" Bugs Bunny
"Scwewy Wabbit!" Elmer Fudd

----------------------------------------------------------
"Ehhh, What's ups Doc?" B.Bunny "Scwewy Wabbit!"E. Fudd
People's Awareness Coalition: Deprogramming Sequence

A major shortcoming in

A major shortcoming in Codified Commercial Law that the IRS likes to capitalize on is that an unrefuted claim is presumed to be true. That is why the citizen MUST always and immediately respond to any and all erroneous claims made by the IRS. According to Commercial Law, the rebuttal must be made in 72 hours from the time of presentment. The rebuttal for an erroneous tax bill can be as simple as, “I don’t owe this and this is not a true bill of commerce.” One of the necessities of Commercial Law is that all affidavits must be signed and attested to be “true, correct, and complete.” The IRS cannot and does not attest its “presentments” to individuals. When properly utilized, the ultimate advantage in Commercial Law goes to the Sovereign who has the final, unrebuttable truth on his or her side as an affidavit. By understanding the rules that the IRS operates under, it becomes a simple matter to beat them at their own game! Commercial Law is nonjudicial. That’s how the IRS takes away Citizen’s property without a day in Court. However, Patriots are currently using the non-judicial aspect of the Commercial Law to lien the property of corrupt Government officials who do not uphold their oath and known duty to support the Constitution.

the OMB number has to be on

the OMB number has to be on any state or federal document, not on an individuals return

I don't believe you for a minute

I need some proof. You can black out your name on letters and take a picture of them or something. The W-0 is such an old scam it's no longer on the IRS active scams lists. Prove me wrong, please.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk_e1-HJ5EY&feature=channel_page

Ok, I have the e-mail and questions

The letter is dated 6/19/06. But the application is stamped Jun 2007 and it's dated 6/13/04 but includes 2004, 2005, 2006, & 2007.
The tone of the letter is little too friendly but I'm not worried about that. I need some details.

the letter that I recieved

the letter that I recieved from the IRS was regarding Tax Year 2004, I had to retro actively submit a copy for every year on record with which I received, or would receive a 10-99. I had "audrey" make a copy for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007...I was told that you could offer no more than 4 years per form.

So was it just the one company that had paid you 10-9

that was the issue, or did that company's willingness to complete that form get rid of any other disputed amounts?

one company supplied 1099, I

one company supplied 1099, I would need to have a W-0 for every company that I did work for that submitted a 10-99

nothing?

nothing?

im scanning now

im scanning now