0 votes

Berg vs. Obama - Update!!

I haven't been able to determine their reasoning. Has anyone seen why it was denied?

01/12/2009: PRESS RELEASE - U.S. Supreme Court denies Berg vs. Obama Berg states he is disappointed for the 300+ million U.S. citizens, for our “Forefathers” and for the tens of thousands that have died defending “our” Constitution and we will fight on as Obama is “not qualified” to be President

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/12/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, in the U.S. Supreme Court announced today that the U.S. Supreme Court has “denied” our Petition For Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment.

Berg said, “I am disappointed for the 300+ million U.S. citizens, our ‘Forefathers’ and for the tens of thousands that have died defending ‘our’ Constitution.

I am committed to keep our efforts going to continue litigation until the truth of Obama being ‘not qualified’ for President comes out. The Obama candidacy is the biggest ‘HOAX’ ever to be put forth to the citizens of the United States in 230 years.

They have a tiger by the tail and don't know what to do.

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

01/09/2009: PRESS RELEASE - Berg states U.S. Supreme Court has “not” made a public decision regarding Berg vs. Obama U.S. Supreme Court Case

(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/09/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, [is in the U.S. Supreme Court with two (2) Conferences scheduled on 1/09/09 & 1/16/09] announced today that the U.S. Supreme Court has “not” made a public decision yet regarding his case.
Berg said, “I am making these remarks because of the ‘wrong’ statements circulating that the case of Berg vs. Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court has been dismissed. We checked with the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday afternoon, January 9th and “no” decision has been made. We will have to wait until at least Monday for the decision regarding what took place at the Conference on January 9th.
Please wait with us. Hopefully, the U.S. Supreme Court will grant our Writ of Certiorari as there is nothing more important than “our” U.S. Constitution.”
Berg continued, “We are committed to continuing litigation until the truth of Obama being “not qualified” for President comes out. The Obama candidacy is the biggest “HOAX” every put forth to the citizens of the United States in 230 years.
In addition to the current case in the U.S. Supreme Court, we have or will have:

A case filed two [2] months ago captioned Berg vs. Obama, said case “under seal” so I cannot comment further;
The case of Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama, filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; said case being an Interpleader case with the Plaintiff a retired Colonel from the U.S. Air Force who is questioning whether to obey or disobey an order if Obama recalls him, based upon whether or not Obama is a “qualified” President; and
If Obama is sworn in as President, we will file a Petition for Writ of “Quo Warranto,” a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as President because he is “not qualified.”

More and more people are aware of the fact that Obama does not meet the ‘qualifications.’ When the truth finally comes out, individuals including Barack Hussein Obama, Michelle Obama, Howard Dean [Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC)], other top officials of the DNC and senior campaign staff of Obama’s campaign should be brought into the criminal justice system, indicted and tried with incarceration for those convicted.”

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Once Obama is sworn in and starts signing bills

many more cases will clog the courts. Say for instance Congress bans "assault weapons" and someone is charged with violation of that law. The defense is that there is no law, because no bill was signed by a President. Defense attorneys will ask for dismissal and to call witnesses like Obama himself and Hawaiian officials to bring evidence to prove he is qualified. Juries will hear arguments. No matter how many cases have convictions, some judges will side with the defense and some judges will find that Obama is not qualified. It will be one mess, and as economic conditions worsen creating the propensity to rebellion, this could be the spark for Civil War. This potentially could tear the military into factions for those who take their own oaths seriously.

It is gross dereliction of duty on the part of the Supreme Court to ignore this issue.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

fireant's picture

Some messes are better than others,

and I think I'd rather have this one than "free reign" for the Obots.

Undo what Wilson did

There will be a sad day of reckoning

for many in high places if this does come out in the future. RP says they would laugh at him if he mentioned this in congress. WHY? He also said that it did not stand a chance, and the online birth cert,. has been accepted.

Ron Paul did actually

Ron Paul did actually address it? His silence has been deafening thus far. Glad to hear that he is listening... we were hoping he would stand up, but I for one can understand why he hasn't. He is occupied with the FED that he hasn't had time I'm sure to do the research on the Eligibility Issue. In which makes it hard for him to take a stand... but this issue isn't going away.. it has also been found that several cases that were denied are actually still active. I believe the Justices are up to something...but either way, eventually it will have to be addressed. I saw yesterday that Arnold was heading to Capital Hill with a team of lawyers to try and get the Natural Born Citizen Clause ratified

fireant's picture

They are doing their damndest to sweep this under the rug.

WE can't let "em!

Undo what Wilson did

Same-O, Same-O

Congress had the opportunity to address this issue on January 8th when they accepted the vote of the Electoral College and there was not a peep from one of the members, not even Dr. Paul. So don't look to Congress to do squat.

The Supreme Court probably intends to do nothing, but the way they have gone about quashing these cases strikes me as strange. In each case the plaintiff filed the application and it was denied by a liberal Justice (Kennedy, Ginsberg, or Souter). They then refiled with a conservative Justice (Scalia, Thomas, or Roberts), and it was referred to conference instead of being denied outright. In conference 4 Justices must agree to accept the case for it to be reviewed, but in each case the conference denied the application. The Lightfoot case is scheduled for conference on January 23, after Obama's coronation.

I now think that the Justices are just referring these cases to conference as a means of killing them since after being denied in conference the case can go not further. Nobody knows why the cases were rejected in conference because that is secret; no opinions were written.

I understand that Roberts will swear in Obama, so I am wondering how he ethically can do that after having read the applications to the Court, unless he honestly concluded that Obama is a "natural born citizen". Even if they rejected each case on procedural grounds and not on the merits of the case, Roberts still must have an opinion about Obama's citizenship status. Roberts is the one who referred Lightfoot to conference.

I have seen some speculation that the Court cannot rule on Obama's qualifications until he is President since the Constitution sets forth the requirements for President and not "President Elect", but I think this is grasping at straws by those who do not want to recognize that the Court is refusing to follow the Constitution.

Since Congress has already refused to act, and is not likely to act on this issue anytime in the near future, the Courts are the only peaceful way to resolve this, and it looks like they are refusing to do so.

"Bend over and grab your ankles" should be etched in stone at the entrance to every government building and every government office.

I fear all hope has vanished that our Constitution is even

alive any more. At best it might be on life support, but I’m not even sure about that!

This issue before the Supreme Court whether or not Obama is qualified under the Constitution to become President, is a serious suite. With numerous suites spread across 12 different states including the three before the Supreme Court itself, how could these Justices dismiss the issue as though it were NOT importent?

I have no doubt that Obama will be another terrible President for this country, but so will any other Democrat or Republican for that matter. So my heart in this matter has never been one of how can we oust Obama through some shady legal maneuver, so we could have someone better. For me it has ALWAYS been about the Constitution, and had faith the Court would interrupt this issue and render a rule of Law, whatever the outcome was.

Our fore fathers were intelligent enough to know that the people needed protection from this newly formed government they were creating. So they created along with it a Judicial Branch. This Judicial Branch was put in place SPECIFICIALLY to make sure the other two branches of Government OBEYED the Constitution of the United Sates. They tried very hard to envision what if would take to keep this branch of government from becoming corrupted by politics. Their decision was to have all Supreme Court Judges appointed for life. The reason was simple, as they did not want these judges to be beholding to political removal every few years by corrupt politicians.

The Judicial Branch of Government has always been the last avenue of hope the American people have in stopping our government from going amuck. And as a whole, throughout the years their decisions have protected the American people from our government, and other would-be tyrants. But I fear that is longer the case, as this present Judicial Branch does NOT seem to care if our Constitution survives or not.

The Court's decision to dismiss the Berg Suite without even hearing the case has me very depressed to say the least. They OWED it to us as Americans, to interpret this most important Constitutional issue. By doing nothing, the Court has let all of America down. They have literally spit on the graves of all those hundreds of thousands of young men and women who gave up their very lives to uphold and defend our liberties. Who the hell do they think they are?

May God change the hearts of men before it is too late!

hjschaapman

The Winds of Change!

Are you surprised?

The legal process has been exhausted. We're facing absolute tyranny and it's time to become citizen soldiers.

fireant's picture

Sue the Democrats for fraud

Why are we not screaming for the DNC to show some credentials? They are the ones who put forth the candidate.

Undo what Wilson did

Here is more info on this

Here is more info on this case. While the traitorous SC chooses to ignore the law they swore to uphold there are other cases still pending. Maybe one of them will encounter a judge with balls and a conscience.

Latest eligibility challenge rejected
Justices' conference results in no action on constitutional questions
Posted: January 12, 2009
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Another case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president has been turned back by the U.S. Supreme Court, but the man who brought it, Philip J. Berg, said the issue won't disappear.

"I am committed to keep our efforts going to continue litigation until the truth of Obama being 'not qualified' for president comes out. The Obama candidacy is the biggest 'HOAX' ever put forth to the citizens of the United States in 230 years," Berg said in a statement today confirming the latest arguments submitted to the high court weren't given a further hearing.

According to Berg's statement, his case was dealt with at a conference among the justices Friday.

WND has reported on the long series of legal cases challenging Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office based on questions and allegations about his birth place that could disqualify him because of the Constitution's demand that the president be a "natural born" citizen.

"In addition to the current case in the U.S. Supreme Court, we have or will have … a case filed two months ago captioned Berg vs. Obama," Berg's statement said.

Join the campaign to urge the Supreme Court to take the eligibility question seriously by FedExing the justices.

He said that case remains "under seal," and he isn't commenting on it.

Another case, Berg pointed out, Hollister vs. Barry Soetoro a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama, also is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The suit by a retired U.S. Air Force colonel raises the issue of whether military personnel would be required to obey an order from Obama if the commander-in-chief is not qualified to hold office.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=85936

Maybe they are looking for a weak case

See my "Do you suppose" post below.

Our governemnt is failing us, again.

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

Our governemnt is failing us, again.

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

Our governemnt is failing us, again.

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

-MY OPS ARE BLACKER THAN YOUR OPS-

Class action suit

Those who donated to his campaign should sue him for fraud since he was never eligible to run for president.

meekandmild's picture

Maybe we should start contacting our reps

demand removal of all supreme court justices for failure to carry out their constitutional duties.

fireant's picture

A Perfect Opportunity...

...to wake up our neighbors. Since MSM has not covered it, we have instant cred to show that fact. It is a blatant violation of the law (Constitution, supreme law of the land) and they bury it!! Ammo here:
http://www.scribd.com/people/view/4975153-fireant

Undo what Wilson did

Denied

Why?

Do you suppose,

in order to cover their rears, the Court is looking for a weak case in order to easily find for Obama and then the media can claim that that issue has been ruled upon and is old news? Wouldn't that be a crock? Berg's case seems strong. Thoughts?

I Have Been Following These Cases And Seen Enough

evidence to believe that Obama is not eligible and not even a citizen. IE: no birth certificate,his own grandmother states he was born in Kenya. The Kenyan Ambassador admits Obama born in Kenya and his birthplace is already becoming an "attraction". How many cases are the SCOTUS and other courts going too reject when it is clear that everything surrounding this man is rife with everything from campaign fraud to perjury on law form concerning his name and has he used any aliases. He has not provided any verifiable documentation concerning himself,and actually just about everythings locked up tight as a frogs ass.

Are we just going to sit back and take this?????????

How about nationwide protests on Jan 20th in every city on inauguration day for those that cannot travel and 2 huge ones, one on the steps of the Supreme Court and one SURROUNDING the periphery of the actual inauguration itself.

I've seen a lot of shit these last 4 terms but this takes the damned cake...

http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/

http://www.obamacrimes.com/

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18281

http://americamustknow.com/lawsuits.aspx

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message666017/pg1

Revolt For Freedom !!!

Revolt For Freedom !!!
.
.

This IS important, but sometimes I think

they planned this as a distraction while they steal US land and freedoms.

Thanks for the update...

...bump...

O.P.O.G.G. - Fighting the attempted devolution of the rEVOLution
Ron Paul 2012...and beyond
BAN ELECTRONIC VOTING!!

If you can make a donation

he needs our help.

Awaiting more news

As always.

deserving of a bump

Ginny in PA

Berg on Power Hour - Listen Live 1/12/09 9:05AM CST

http://www.gcnlive.com/ListenLive/realplayerfreeNtwk2.ram

--------------
Regarding Palin: I believe we are watching in real time the rise of the third party, which will be controlled by the powers that be from its' inception.

Next Scam: "Cash For Cash"

http://www.RonPaul2012.com

inauguration of Obama

So, what are we to do now?

Obama will be inaugurated into office in 2 days.

God bless America
marianne
http://heavenawaits.wordpress.com/

fireant's picture

Enlist in "thepaperwar"

We intend to swamp DC in Violations.
http://www.scribd.com/people/view/4975153-fireant
A new Violation will be available soon for your "Rep" who did not raise objections on Jan 8.

Undo what Wilson did