HOLY CRAP!!!! Congress repealing the 22nd Amendment. Trying to Eliminate Presidential term limits

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The only way to repeal an

The only way to repeal an amendment is via a new amendment. In addition, Congress does not have the power to do this. Amendments to the Constitution must be ratified in very specific ways. If I'm not mistaken, it would require something like 3/4 of the legislators within 3/4 of all state legislatures in order for this to go through.

...

Link

http://www.drizzten.com/blog/2005/06/repealing_the_22nd_amendment_a.html

Freedom is another way to God...A corrupt government is a straight way to hell.

I believe in Hope & Change..I Hope the government will Change
Spindale-Rutherford County-North Carolina

It doesn't say they want to get rid of presidential term limits

It says they want to get rid of limits on money that can be donated to presidential campaigns, right?
----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul

----------
"We will never give up. We will never give in." - Dr. Ron Paul

wrong

wrong bill. it's labeled the same but is for the 110th congress. this one is for the 111th congress. i posted with a link to what i could find on it below.

This legislation's been around awhile

Here's a youtube video explaining: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FONIyedVo9s&watch_response

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Start getting freedom today by dumping Federal Reserve Notes, Stocks, Banks and anything made outside the USA. Buy precious metals, real estate, businesses, food and guns and get your business community to use local or sound currenc

Here is what i found.

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election to public office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 4, 2007

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to limitations on the amounts of contributions and expenditures that may be made in connection with campaigns for election to public office.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

Article --

Section 1. Congress shall have power to set limits on the amount of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, Federal office.

Section 2. A State shall have power to set limits on the amount of contributions that may be accepted by, and the amount of expenditures that may be made by, in support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for nomination for election to, or for election to, State or local office.

Section 3. Congress shall have power to implement and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.'.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hj110-5

wrong

wrong bill

Thank you

Thank you for alerting us to this. Here is what I could find on it.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.J.Res.5:

I really dont see this getting out of committee, but you never know. Now we can keep an eye on it.

H.J. Res. 5

Thnaks for the information!

hjschaapman

The Winds of Change!