Constitutionalist Beats Seat Belt Ticket In CA

0 votes

LibertyFight.com

CONSTITUTIONALIST BEATS SEAT BELT TICKET
By Martin Hill
1/18/09

The abuse of the American people at the hands of our morally bankrupt corrupt government has expanded to such an obscene state today that I often encourage people to resist all tyranny every way they can. One way I like to do this, and have been quite successful at, is fighting traffic tickets here in California. I have beaten six of them in court; in the one case the kangaroo court judge found me 'guilty' of speeding, but I filed an appeal in the Superior Court of Appeals in San Bernardino County, CA. I wrote my own legal brief, filed it through the mail, (one misnomer is that you have to show up in person and miss time off work. Not true at all). A panel of three judges ruled for me and threw out the phony conviction.

Scott, a friend of mine and insurance salesman from Alta Dena, California and father of three kids, recently called me up and relayed the story of how he was crossing the street in Los Angeles and was given a jaywalking ticket. He protested to the cop that the lighted crosswalk sign (which flashes and counts down the number of seconds you have left) still had 13 seconds on it. The dutiful state servant informed him that if he entered the street after the countdown had already begun, that constitutes jaywalking. Scott is currently fighting the ticket. It's the first ticket he has ever fought, and got a 2 month extension to begin the process.

John Shanahan, PE, licensed engineer member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth [AE911truth.org]
and co-founder of Inland Empire 9/11 Truth, is a Constittuionalist and liberty advocate who recently beat a seat belt ticket in Rancho Cucamonga CA.
When John was pulled over for not wearing his seat belt, he had engaged the officer in a discussion about the 4th Ammendment, privacy concerns and the nanny state in which cops serve as revenue collectors, spending time ticketing people for things that are none of the state's business. The cop defended his position and gave him the ticket.

As you will read below, the cop that ticketed John denied that he even swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution! So after receiving his ticket, John contacted the Sherrif's Dept. and asked them for a copy of the oath that the officers swear to.


I have always shared my stores of traffic court success and highly encouraged friends and coworkers to do the same. So when John got his ticket, he gave me a call. 'How could he not fight this b.s.?', I insisted. John filed what's called a trial by declaration. The good thing about this is that if you lose, you are entitled to what's called a TRIAL DE NOVO [CVC 40902], in which the first conviction is vacated and you get a trial in person. It is not an appeal, but rather a brand new trial. this is why I always encourage people to do a trial by declaration through the mail first. It's basically like a free shot at winning. My friend Sylvia Smith, former owner of the UPS Store in Upland, had gotten a $600 speeding ticket. I encouraged her to visit HelpIGotATicket.com and told her about my success in using the site. By the way, Geo McCalip does an absolutely great job with his free informational website HelpIGotATicket.com. This is where I learned all this stuff and I cannot praise him enough. He is a true liberty advocate an example for us all. Sylvia filed a trial by declaration and also asked for a BAIL WAIVER ("I can't afford it right now",) which the clerk will usually give you, at least in my town. If the ticketing officer does not submit his TRIAL BY DECLARATION evidence to the court, the case is dismissed. This is what happened with Sylvia. She did not miss one minute off work and didn't spend one dime. The next time I saw her she exuberantly told me of her victory- she had never fought a ticket before. "Now Sylvia, will you ever plead guilty to anything ever again?" I asked. 'HECK NO!' she shouted, giving me a high five. When I do a trial by declaration, I only write the words "I'm not guilty" in the description area. You can include as much or as little as you like, but I figure why show them your full defense ahead of time, in case it goes to an in-person trial. Sylvia had written only the words "Im not guilty" on her form.

In John's case, he atttached the following evidence. His text consisted of the following:

"During the course of our short roadside discussion in the extremely intrustive nature of seat belt citation, it became clear that deputy Fussell was ignorant of his sworn duty to protect "support and defend" the Constitution of the United States. On 6/17/08, I received by email a copy of the oath that is sworn by all members of the S.B. County Sheriff's Police, per Jennifer Hanblin (Public Affairs Division).

The contents of the solemn oath apparently mean so little to Deputy Fussell that he not only never gave any thought to the history and meaning of the U.S. Constitution (especially the 4th Ammendment which applies to my case), but he denied that he ever swore an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution!!!
Date: 11/9/08"

Here is a COPY of John's statement [Here is a larger version] which he submitted on 11/4/08. Here is the front page of John's 'TRIAL BY DECLARATION' form that accompanied it.

Here is the

EMAIL FROM SHERRIF'S DEPT. outling the Constitutional oath that every Sherrif takes.
Here is an actual copy of the CONSTITUTIONAL OATH they swear to uphold.

Here is the
notice from the court
stating that the officer did not reply to the challenge, and so the case is dismissed. He didn't pay the $103 dollar ransom they demanded, he never claimed to have worn his seat belt. and he won.
Here is a page which includes INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TRIAL BY DECLARATION..

You may also want to see my previous articles Opposition To Red Light Cameras- A Personal View [8/4/2008] which outlines my opposition to red light camera revenue scams, and a recent article the Press Interprise Newspaper did on red light camera tickets after they contacted me about my website NoTrafficCameras.Info. Also, be sure to read An Easy Way To Beat A Traffic Ticket (Great Preemptive Measure) using the 'County Seat', change of venue measure which is our right under the California Vehicle Code.
Also, the great website HighwayRobbery.Net, an invaluable resoruce that I highly recommend, covers the recent victory of a southern california man who beat a red light camera ticket in Superior Court of Appeals because the city that issued the ticket had an illegal contract with the red light camera company.

I will end with this reminder below, a recent article from MSN Money which outlines numerous admissions that traffic tickets are largely for nothing but revenue. A hearty congratulations to John Shanahan for beating his seat belt ticket, and remember folks- if we can't even fight the little petty tyrannies, How can we fight the serious tyranny when the time comes? You're gonna supposedly resist the FEMA Camps, forced innoculations, Military Draft, gun grabs, Civilian Service Corps, property seizures, etc. but can't 'bother' to fight a nonsensical ticket? Heed this adivce, and trust me it will make your day to beat these bastards using their own game against them. FIGHT YOUR TICKETS- EVERY TIME- AND WIN. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT. AND WIN. Cost this beast system money. Break it down. And for that one day, drive down the road with the window down, in the sunshine, let out a 'whooo haw'! and smile. For me.
---------------------------------------

Speeding? You'll pay higher 'taxes'

Tickets are often as much about revenue as safety. And now, as a soured economy or other factors further empty coffers, many are turning to law enforcement to serve as part-time tax collectors -- with guns and badges.

Many states and cities no longer even try to hide that fact.

Making up for lost money
Cities, counties and other government agencies have found that there's lots of money to be made in stepped-up traffic enforcement:
----A Detroit News analysis last fall found that metro-area police departments had "drastically increased" the number of tickets issued for moving violations as revenue from the state -- in the throes of multiple economic crises -- had declined markedly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

its a fun game of chess...

its a fun game of chess...

To MikeLawson

In CA it is called bail or a penalty fee, in lieu of something less dramatic like a "fine" or in Europe a "demerit" (how high-school) you can see where their heads are with the language they use, can't you? Us criminal-types are encouraged to just pay the bail (maybe before we get arrested?) and the matter will be dropped, you can take your points and be on your way, and it is oh, so easy to pay instead of fighting. They take credit cards, checks, cash, payments, just fork it over and they'll be happy to drop it in the endless bucket and you will be relieved of the scumbag stigma. But seriously, if you look up California Rules of Court, Bail and Penalty Schedule January 2009, you will see the traffic infraction and misdemeanor list and a column marked "total bail" it's even on the courtesy notice they send out, how pleasant. It's also called bail for infractions for Boating and Fish & Game! Fun huh?

Awesome!

Thank you for posting.

Great info

.

fighting tickets is fun

I have been fighting (my husband's) tickets and have gotten two dismissals and my money back and am working on the third one now for a seatbelt ticket he got. The other two were for speed (the old man's got a leadfoot), one was with a radar gun!! HA! I use helpIgotaticket.com and trial by written declarations. It's amazing the control and power you feel sticking up for yourself or others. I even question the fines and make them breakdown the cost for the bail. This time, they resisted giving ME a file-stamped copy of the Request for Trial by Written Declaration and paying the bail, they said he had to come in personally, not true! I got the supervisor to give it to me. Don't let them get away with anything and don't take "no" for an answer, make them explain why and get up out of their seat to get the super. JUST DO IT! Don't be afraid of retalliation or anything else, Judges hate to be overturned on appeal, so go for it. Even if you "deserved" the ticket, make sure they think twice about writing it.

The bail? What traffic offense involves bail?

Maybe your husband should start driving better. Beating tickets is fun, but still a pain in the butt to mess with. I'd rather avoid them in the first place. Cheaper insurance too.

.

.

Great information

Thank you for posting this. It should be stickied for life.

Wow, thank you for bringing this up!

For those who would say "what is this doing on the Daily Paul?" I will say that common every day topics like this are an excellent way to ease people into thinking differently about their relationship to government. It's amazing how empowering it can feel to beat a simple traffic citation.

Here are two tactics I have used for parking citations:

1. Write "Refused for Cause" diagonally across the top in red felt pen and send it back certified mail within 72 hours. These insidious little slips of paper are nothing but commercial offers to contract with no valid cause of action. Fighting them only validates the claim being made by the privately funded parking meter attendant. Remember, in law he who claims last bears the burden of proof. Walk into court screaming "I'm not guilty!" and the black robed pirate will quickly respond "Prove it!".

2. After 72 hours, you can send something like this by certified mail:

City of Kingsville
PO Box 1234
Kingsville, California [99666]

Re: “Notice of Parking Violation, Issue No. 333666999"

Dear City of Kingsville,

In accordance with California Commercial Code – Article 3, Section 3501 (b) (3), The enclosed instrument “Notice of Parking Violation” is, without dishonor, hereby returned for lack of a necessary indorsement.

and

In accordance with California Commercial Code – Article 3, Section 3501 (b) (3), The enclosed “Notice of Parking Violation” is, without dishonor, refused for payment and not accepted for failure to comply with the terms of the instrument.

This submission satisfies and retires “Notice of Parking Violation, Issue No. 333666999”. All terms herein will stand to the exclusion of any and all alternate terms if no valid response is received within 10 days.

To be relevant, a response must demonstrate that “Notice of Parking Violation, Issue No. 333666999” are not subject to California Commercial Code. Presentment contents “Due Now, $45.00” establish “Notice of Parking Violation, Issue No. 333666999” as an offer of commercial contract fully subject to and bound by California Commercial Code and the options exercised herein.

Sincerely,
Maynard Griffin; Krebbs

Enclosed:

• Flawed presentments (original parking citations)

• Pre-Addressed Envelope provided by parking enforcement
• Copy of applicable law (below)

COMMERCIAL CODE
3501. (a) "Presentment" means a demand made by or on behalf of a person entitled to enforce an instrument (1) to pay the instrument made to the drawee or a party obliged to pay the instrument or, in the case of a note or accepted draft payable at a bank, to the bank, or (2) to accept a draft made to the drawee.
(b) The following rules are subject to Division 4 (commencing with Section 4101), agreement of the parties, and clearinghouse rules and the like:
(1) Presentment may be made at the place of payment of the instrument and shall be made at the place of payment if the instrument is payable at a bank in the United States; may be made by any commercially reasonable means, including an oral, written, or electronic communication; is effective when the demand for payment or acceptance is received by the person to whom presentment is made; and is effective if made to any one of two or more makers, acceptors, drawees, or other payors.
(2) Upon demand of the person to whom presentment is made, the person making presentment shall (A) exhibit the instrument, (B) give reasonable identification and, if presentment is made on behalf of another person, reasonable evidence of authority to do so, and (C) sign a receipt on the instrument for any payment made or surrender the instrument if full payment is made.
(3) Without dishonoring the instrument, the party to whom presentment is made may (A) return the instrument for lack of a necessary indorsement, or (B) refuse payment or acceptance for failure of the presentment to comply with the terms of the instrument, an agreement of the parties, or other applicable law or rule.
(4) The party to whom presentment is made may treat presentment as occurring on the next business day after the day of presentment if the party to whom presentment is made has established a cutoff hour not earlier than 2 p.m. for the receipt and processing of instruments presented for payment or acceptance and presentment is made after the cutoff hour.

3204. (a) "Indorsement" means a signature, other than that of a signer as maker, drawer, or acceptor, that alone or accompanied by other words is made on an instrument for the purpose of (1) negotiating the instrument, (2) restricting payment of the instrument, or (3) incurring indorser's liability on the instrument, but regardless of the intent of the signer, a signature and its accompanying words is an indorsement unless the accompanying words, terms of the instrument, place of the signature, or other circumstances unambiguously indicate that the signature was made for a purpose other than indorsement. For the purpose of determining whether a signature is made on an instrument, a paper affixed to the instrument is a part of the instrument.
(b) "Indorser" means a person who makes an indorsement.
(c) For the purpose of determining whether the transferee of an instrument is a holder, an indorsement that transfers a security interest in the instrument is effective as an unqualified indorsement of the instrument.
(d) If an instrument is payable to a holder under a name that is not the name of the holder, indorsement may be made by the holder in the name stated in the instrument or in the holder's name or both, but signature in both names may be required by a person paying or taking the instrument for value or collection.

These tactics seem to work very well for parking citations, but I haven't tried them for a moving violation. I imagine if you signed the citation "under duress" or "all rights reserved" or something to that effect you could use the above tactics.

If you find yourself in a court situation, a great source for using codes and statutes is David Myrland's site. There are audio instructions and downloads.

http://www.jurisinformatics.com

************
http://www.pyrabang.com - the People's "information stock exchange" that will take a huge bite out of Google's ad profits and put them in your pocket!

If you must appear in

If you must appear in person, always attempt to schedule your hearing on the opposite schedule of when you got the ticket. If the ticket was issued during the day then ask for night court (if available) because the officer will not usually appear in his off time and it will be dismissed.

Wow,

impressive.

THANKS for all the

valuable information that you researched
and shared with us.

"Ask not what your country can do
for you, Ask what you can do for
your country."
John F. Kennedy 1961valuable information

"Freedom is a right that can never be won in war,only by each individual "

love it... "When

love it...

"When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny."
-Thomas Jefferson

I am more concerned about the return of my money than the return on my money. --Mark Twain

“A prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Prov. 22:3; 27:12 KJV)

Hey McCain-----┌П┐(◣_◢)┌П┐

This is really cool. Are most seatbelt cases heard in Superior

Court? Wouldn't you have to go through a bunch of appeals to get there?

I know what you are saying,

but two wrongs don't make a right !

I take it you have never been injured before ? I have, and even when seat belts were not mandatory I wore them. No, I'm not a sissy, but I am not stupid either.

2003, I had a head on collision with a SUV and the car I was driving was totaled, it was a '84 Toyota Celica GT and only had shoulder seat-belts. The seat-belts saved me an the wife from going through the windshield.

All though your post you espouse freedom and liberties, but it is seriously flawed. Who do you think is going to have to pay for higher insurance premiums because of your freedom to act recklessly ? Who knows, maybe you don't have insurance then citizen taxpayers will have to pay your medical bills when and if you get hurt. I have to carry insurance to protect myself from uninsured motorist; you are not one, are you ?

Hint : There's enough GDF idiots on the street nowadays, the cops won't bother you even if you drive half way sane.

Actually Bonhomme Richard It's all A Crap Shoot...

I was involved in a very bad head on collision in 1980 and the Dr at the hospital upon hearing the details of the accident looked at me and said "You are lucky you weren't wearing a seat belt because you would have died almost immediately".
.
http://www.ronpaulsingles.com/

Paper Ballots Hand Counted At The Precinct Or Bust
Support WTP Federal Supreme Court Case To Ban All Electronic Voting Or Forget 2010 or 2012
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2009-05-11...

Yes, New Hampshire (no seat belt law) was 42nd in auto

fatalities per capita in 2006. That`s low for a state that has icy road conditions a great part of the year.

" The force of a correction is equal and opposite to the deception that proceded it"
B. Bonner

"Since 1789 the only government on Earth that has the power to crush the American people`s liberties across the board is the government of the United States"
Robert Higgs

actually I was being sarcastic. This was a run of the mill

thing and it is being treated like a huge deal. It's funny. In fact I'm gonna find and bump another thread I am still waiting for an answer on.

how retarded

Who says I would want to be treated at the hospitals and want someone else to pay for the bills?
Libertarians take the responsibilities for their actions in case you didn't know.
I won't even get into the costs of medical care in this country...

choice

I wear a seatbelt for safety. I wore it before it was a law. I don't need a nanny telling me I have to wear a seatbelt. I am old enough to decide. I don't care to fly through a windshield if I am in a wreck, but I don't want anyone telling me I have to wear it either.

force

I'm sure you've heard the old libertarian adage, 'my right to swing my arm ends at your face'. As long as the person is not endangering anyones person or property, there should be no law against it.

the state has no such valid authority to dictate every aspect of our lives.
I personally wear my seat belt, because i choose to.usually.
i also talk on my cell phone, are you against that too?

also, check out the great article by walter williams titled clickit or ticket.

let's keep perspective hear on the proper role of govt.
"All men in power should be distrusted.." -James Madison

"All men in power should be distrusted.." -James Madison

Yes, I am against talking on your cell phone too

Because when I did, I rear ended someone like you. (the truth)

I know, you are not me and you are a Liberatain and all Libertarins can drive and talk on cell phones without causing accidents.

So, don't talk on "my" cell phone then...

and if you do and you 1)damage another's property, or 2)violate another's rights - then, and only then - does anyone have a claim against you - but for no other reason than #'s 1 or 2...

Liberty 101, my friend...

...and yes, I have been injured, seriously and permanently...

Thanks for the info, Dissident...

Yours in Liberty,

Shovel

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote..." ~ Ben Franklin

"The 'cost of freedom' is risk and responsibility..." ~ Me

Yours in Liberty,

Shovel

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote..." ~ Ben Franklin

"The 'cost of freedom' is risk and responsibility..." ~ Me

Under the Socialist program

We all pay.

No

The seat belt case was not heard in superior court. he beat it in the trial by declaration, which means through the mail without having to show up in person.

if you lose a traffic case in CA you can appeal it, and it goes to superior court. not too big a deal, really, it's very easy as long as you file the garbage on time.

if he had lost the case then he would have appealed it, and it would go to superior court of appeals.

"All men in power should be distrusted.." -James Madison

"All men in power should be distrusted.." -James Madison